wassup Posted September 1, 2004 Share Posted September 1, 2004 No doubt, many of you have probably seen this flash video, and it has left me a bit perplexed on what the facts really are behind Flight 77 and the attack upon the Pentagon. Please post your thoughts upon the validity of the video and the evidence that it presents, as well as any other insights, sources, etc. about what really happened on the attack upon the Pentagon on September 11th, 2001. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Groovy Posted September 1, 2004 Share Posted September 1, 2004 Originally posted by wassup No doubt, many of you have probably seen this flash video, and it has left me a bit perplexed on what the facts really are behind Flight 77 and the attack upon the Pentagon. Please post your thoughts upon the validity of the video and the evidence that it presents, as well as any other insights, sources, etc. about what really happened on the attack upon the Pentagon on September 11th, 2001. I liked the music. No seriously, I am a big fan of conspiracies so I enjoyed it. It was a very well put together flash film. I never even thought about plain crashes when all of this was going on, but he is absolutely right, where in the hell is the damn plain?!?!? I often toyed with the idea that internaly, higher forces would start a war for revenge and profit, but I felt it so sick and twisted, that I never told anyone. Kind of makes you wonder though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kain Posted September 1, 2004 Share Posted September 1, 2004 I never even thought about it...apparently I too am a victim of the mind control machine. ****. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ET Warrior Posted September 1, 2004 Share Posted September 1, 2004 That video creeps me out. It's all has such a truthful ring to it, I mean, the pictures are real, and it's hard to explain away the lack of wreckage from a freakin 757.... The thing that REALLY gets me is the video tapes that the FBI has taken and not released... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elijah Posted September 1, 2004 Share Posted September 1, 2004 Insane.... I would say the FBI, like always, is hiding somthing, simple as that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyrion Posted September 1, 2004 Share Posted September 1, 2004 The movie does make some rather interesting parts, like the total lack of weckage and the confiscation of video tapes. Althought the only part I don't get is how come they used actual Boeings 757's in the WTC, but bombed the Pentagon? I still feel that there was a plane that landed into the pentagon, mostly because there isn't much plausible doubt to the contary. Besides, why would the government destroy the pentagon since what impact it would have emotionally is redudant to what the WTC had done. Edit- A site describing why the movie's theory is false. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CapNColostomy Posted September 1, 2004 Share Posted September 1, 2004 The first song is from Perfect Dark. Knowing that, I cannot take this seriously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ET Warrior Posted September 1, 2004 Share Posted September 1, 2004 That website is a lot less convincing than the actual Theory Tyrion. It still doesn't explain the governments purpose in removing every video that had a reasonable shot of the incident from public view, nor does it explain why nobody on the highway saw a 757 flying overhead, or why the cars weren't flung off the road as a plane flew 350 mph hour over their heads. Also, if it impacted the ground first, there should have been MASSIVE ground damage in front of the pentagon, which was not the case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kain Posted September 1, 2004 Share Posted September 1, 2004 That reinforced concrete crap is bull****. The American military government has missles that can punch through any material and keep going. I know, I watch the History channel's Modern Marvels. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yaebginn Posted September 1, 2004 Share Posted September 1, 2004 Originally posted by Darth Groovy I am a big fan of conspiracies so I enjoyed it. then we have much to discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hiroki Posted September 1, 2004 Share Posted September 1, 2004 Ohh yes. Now this was very interesting. It does make you wonder. But I am a bit bias towards the video, as I've never liked the FBI and there cronies very much anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doomie Posted September 1, 2004 Share Posted September 1, 2004 Okaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay, that was really weird... Almost with everything the terrorists do, there are some people who find evidence of a conspiracy set up by the fbi. Mostly, they are able to back up their stories pretty well... who should we believe? EDIT: christ yaeb, you've even got more posts than me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yaebginn Posted September 1, 2004 Share Posted September 1, 2004 Originally posted by Doomgiver EDIT: christ yaeb, you've even got more posts than me! what can I say I'm a geek and thats right, I do mean- n./ 2 a carnival performer who bites the heads off live chickens in a performance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyrion Posted September 1, 2004 Share Posted September 1, 2004 Yaeb, better a geek than a dork. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteKnight77 Posted September 5, 2004 Share Posted September 5, 2004 Something to think about, where is the debris left from the 2 aircraft that hit the WTC? Those pieces weren't found either. Did those planes just up and dissappear also? where in the hell is the damn plain?!?!? I hope the plain is somewhere in the midwest or along the coast. The plane on the other hand disintegrated like the other 2 did and what didn't burned up the same way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kain Posted September 5, 2004 Share Posted September 5, 2004 Originally posted by WhiteKnight77 Something to think about, where is the debris left from the 2 aircraft that hit the WTC? Those pieces weren't found either. Did those planes just up and dissappear also? No, they were in the wreckage of 2 110 story buildings. Kinda hard to tell the difference between lots of building and a little plane. I hope the plain is somewhere in the midwest or along the coast. The plane on the other hand disintegrated like the other 2 did and what didn't burned up the same way. Then how come the black boxes from the 3 planes that DIDN'T hit the Pentagon turned up, but the black box from flight 77 is MIA? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lukeiamyourdad Posted September 6, 2004 Share Posted September 6, 2004 Originally posted by WhiteKnight77 Something to think about, where is the debris left from the 2 aircraft that hit the WTC? Those pieces weren't found either. Did those planes just up and dissappear also? Dude there's like plenty of video evidence...We've seen enough videos of the planes crashing into the towers for no one to doubt it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kain Posted September 6, 2004 Share Posted September 6, 2004 Originally posted by lukeiamyourdad Dude there's like plenty of video evidence...We've seen enough videos of the planes crashing into the towers for no one to doubt it. Oh, yea. THAT. I forgot to mention THAT... ...stating the obvious rules! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master_Ginn Posted September 6, 2004 Share Posted September 6, 2004 yeah, very wierd. But just for arguments sake, couldn't the planes have disentigrated just like the ones that hit the twin towers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ET Warrior Posted September 7, 2004 Share Posted September 7, 2004 Originally posted by Feanaro yeah, very wierd. But just for arguments sake, couldn't the planes have disentigrated just like the ones that hit the twin towers? Possibly, though one would expect the kind of explosion that would have been enough to actually disintigrate the airplane would have been enough to cause a LOT more structural and ground damage to the Pentagon than what actually occured. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CapNColostomy Posted September 7, 2004 Share Posted September 7, 2004 Doesn't it seem logical, that if there were no plane, that the terrorists would say "Hey, look at the Bush administration! They're lying! We didn't do that one!" just to make a point of pointing out how they lie? That's just my thoughts... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kain Posted September 7, 2004 Share Posted September 7, 2004 Originally posted by CapNColostomy Doesn't it seem logical, that if there were no plane, that the terrorists would say "Hey, look at the Bush administration! They're lying! We didn't do that one!" just to make a point of pointing out how they lie? That's just my thoughts... Would anyone really believe the 'bad guys' in all of this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CapNColostomy Posted September 7, 2004 Share Posted September 7, 2004 Originally posted by Kain Would anyone really believe the 'bad guys' in all of this? I see your point, but I think they'd be pretty quick to not take credit for that, since they're so quick to take credit for the things they do. Maybe I'm wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ET Warrior Posted September 7, 2004 Share Posted September 7, 2004 Although they were also probably eager enough to take credit for what they DIDN'T do. I mean, if they didn't do it they probably assumed that it was some OTHER group of terrorists, but if they take credit it makes them seem more powerful, being able to make a direct attack on the Pentagon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CapNColostomy Posted September 7, 2004 Share Posted September 7, 2004 Originally posted by ET Warrior Although they were also probably eager enough to take credit for what they DIDN'T do. I mean, if they didn't do it they probably assumed that it was some OTHER group of terrorists, but if they take credit it makes them seem more powerful, being able to make a direct attack on the Pentagon. Right, but if they didn't do it, and denounced it instead, it would certainly make great fodder for making the Bush administration look bad/worse. I think that would be far more damaging than saying "oh, that got blown up too? Well hell no, it's not coincidence! We did it!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.