coupes. Posted May 5, 2005 Share Posted May 5, 2005 The search function has been disabled for a while now... But you should still at least look on the first page (that's the minimum ) before you create a new thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Surfnshannon Posted May 5, 2005 Share Posted May 5, 2005 You know - If anybody else asks about the PG13 rating can I have permission to have Boba Rhett yoink them with his Ugly Stick? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy867 Posted May 5, 2005 Share Posted May 5, 2005 Actually, if you look at the bottom part of the Forum page (not of any posts) , you will see a "Search This Forum" with a white text box and go button and I just used it to search for any threads with the PG-13 phrase in it and it worked. [Edit:After further investigation, I have noticed that the Search Function is disabled for regular users.] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coupes. Posted May 5, 2005 Share Posted May 5, 2005 They must have re-enables it sometime ago... But it was disabled Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMadDoofer Posted May 5, 2005 Share Posted May 5, 2005 Sorry about that, I should've looked further. I am very surprised at this though - George Lucas has pandered to the younger set for the last two movies, so why is he changing it now? Not that killing children is good at all, but it might be better if they don't have to edit as much *cough*brief nudity*cough* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Sitherino Posted May 5, 2005 Share Posted May 5, 2005 Originally posted by TheMadDoofer I am very surprised at this though - George Lucas has pandered to the younger set for the last five movies Fixed. Why has he changed? Because this is the birth of Darth Vader, one of the most vile, despicable, villians ever in cinematic history. He is the Dark Lord of the Sith. Some people are incapable of grasping exactly what that means, this will show them all. And this is the link up from the good kid to the most twisted despot in the universe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMadDoofer Posted May 6, 2005 Share Posted May 6, 2005 No, I meant the last two - though definitely moreso Episode I. The other movies focused more on human interactions and "drama" while the last two were special effects and some cutesy characters. (Not that they were that bad) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Sitherino Posted May 6, 2005 Share Posted May 6, 2005 Originally posted by TheMadDoofer No, I meant the last two - though definitely moreso Episode I. The other movies focused more on human interactions and "drama" while the last two were special effects and some cutesy characters. (Not that they were that bad) I don't know where you've been, but all 5 movies so far have been childrens movies. All featuring new innovations in special effects, and containing cute characters. One and Two also focus on human interaction and emotional exploitation. You're just deluded by your fanboyism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Surfnshannon Posted May 6, 2005 Share Posted May 6, 2005 I don't consider any of them to be "children's movies" more like Family movies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK-8252 Posted May 6, 2005 Share Posted May 6, 2005 If you watched the documentaries, you'll see how George intended his movies to attract kids. I would say Episode I is probably the most "kid-friendly" of the saga, but that's not how it was intended. Look at the senate scenes - when I first watched the movie I was like seven or nine (I forgot which year it came out), and I had absolutely no idea what they were talking about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samurai DD Posted May 15, 2005 Share Posted May 15, 2005 Lol, I really dont give a crap about rating. 15 year older who has seen just about anything! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Jaxu Posted May 15, 2005 Share Posted May 15, 2005 Originally posted by TheMadDoofer Sorry about that, I should've looked further. I am very surprised at this though - George Lucas has pandered to the younger set for the last two movies, so why is he changing it now? Not that killing children is good at all, but it might be better if they don't have to edit as much *cough*brief nudity*cough* NUDITY IN STAR WARS??!! WHERE?*acts like a excited dog* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toenail1 Posted May 15, 2005 Share Posted May 15, 2005 It's not like if you're under 13 you can't get into the theater to see it. Have a parent take you, or just buy tickets yourself (the people selling tickets are usually teenagers, and thus don't care). Hell, buy tickets to a kids movie and then sneak in, most theaters don't have guards checking to see if you're in the right movie. Can't find a way to get in? Then you don't deserve to see it in theaters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guybroom Posted May 15, 2005 Share Posted May 15, 2005 Originally posted by Chase Windu I think he's refrencing the Oola goof in RotJ. Explain what the goof is to us lameos (i.e. me) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK-8252 Posted May 15, 2005 Share Posted May 15, 2005 Originally posted by guybroom Explain what the goof is to us lameos (i.e. me) When Oola falls into the Rancor pit, part of her costume slips off and exposes her breast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.326ca6d5b846893a1fbff1b9d7246b95.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.