taclled Posted July 10, 2006 Posted July 10, 2006 So Clone commandos require clones pilots to drop off vehicles. if you think about it the laat transpot model is similar to the pelican. they both have the vehilce in the back/near back and hold on to it simalarly. And clones for intel. (but sometimes they use better sources called jedi lol)Commandos and spartans dont need the vehicles but use them because it makes things easier. it would have been a nice thing to have drivable vehicles in RC huh?
Niner_777 Posted July 10, 2006 Posted July 10, 2006 Yeah, the only vehicles that I've heard of commandos using is that big excavation droid from Hard Contact.
Clone L68362 Posted July 10, 2006 Posted July 10, 2006 On legendary, marines last longer than the chief himself, so yeah, they are pseudo back ups You can't judge things based on game difficulty. If Trando Heavy Mercs were smart in game, they would rip Delta Squad apart without a sweat. Instead, they stare at you for five seconds, fire in bursts, and when they get hurt they can't fire.
Niner_777 Posted July 10, 2006 Posted July 10, 2006 They can't shoot you when you're behind cover, when you're playing smart, like a commando.
taclled Posted July 10, 2006 Posted July 10, 2006 Umn a heav Trando merc couldnt Tear apart a commando, and they mention in some other books about Commandos using Vehicles.
Clone L68362 Posted July 10, 2006 Posted July 10, 2006 They can't shoot you when you're behind cover, when you're playing smart, like a commando. Hehe, but that's just the thing! You can sit behind cover and just snipe them in the head, and they don't do anything. Commandos have it easy
Bomberman65 Posted July 11, 2006 Author Posted July 11, 2006 Hehe, but that's just the thing! You can sit behind cover and just snipe them in the head, and they don't do anything. Commandos have it easy Wrong. Commandos don't have it easy.
Halo_92 Posted July 11, 2006 Posted July 11, 2006 I think it pretty much sucks for the spartans and commandos
-Synthetik- Posted July 11, 2006 Posted July 11, 2006 yeah it does... and if you are going for the enemy intelligence part, the covenant would rip earth a new one if only they were smarter. One nice sword lunge with invisibility would tear a spartan apart, if they had tactical intelligence... even those little grunts on legendary can kick a spartans ass WHILE laughing his ass off. besides trandoshians are notoriously known to being stupid anyway. Like the halos hunters. Its easier to kill both twins than ONE shock elite with dual plasma rifles.
taclled Posted July 11, 2006 Posted July 11, 2006 One nice sword lunge with invisibility would tear a spartan apart, if they had tactical intelligence... even those little grunts on legendary can kick a spartans ass WHILE laughing his ass off. Yeah i learned that the hard way
TSR Posted July 11, 2006 Posted July 11, 2006 An ATTE has way more and bigger guns than a Scorpion. It also has more armor if I've heard right. Somewhere I heard that the Scorpions are rather fragile. In halo 1, the scorpions were the s**t. In halo 2, they had to decrease the power on it tas it was just too powerful. In halo 1 multiplayer, the only way to get the guy out of the scorpion was with another scorpion and a lotta grenades. Although i don't think it could stand up to the ATTE. Keyes vs cody? imo, no contest. keyes was one of the best starfleet captains around, and could easily hold his own in a firefight, as proven in the rescue mission on halo 1. Cody? what, a guy who blindly follows orders, can't think freely and would get his ass whipped in a space manouver battle by keyes? nu-uh, its another win for halo. Banshee vs droid starfighter? the DS can travel much faster than the banshee, has slightly more offensive and accurate weapons AND the pilot's generally don't fly into trees... So SW wins that one. Pillar of Autumn vs venator class? whilst not knowing much about the latter's firepower, i would guess that the venator would win this one, mainbly due to the fact that the pillar of autumn wasnt designed primarily as an attack vessel, more a reconnaisance as such. so id say that the venator would win this one. *breathes*
MachineCult Posted July 11, 2006 Posted July 11, 2006 Keyes vs cody? imo, no contest. keyes was one of the best starfleet captains around, and could easily hold his own in a firefight, as proven in the rescue mission on halo 1. Cody? what, a guy who blindly follows orders, can't think freely and would get his ass whipped in a space manouver battle by keyes? nu-uh, its another win for halo. I meant Cody versus Keyes in hand-to-hand combat. But I only suggested it because Cody would blatantly win
Niner_777 Posted July 11, 2006 Posted July 11, 2006 Even though Keyes is skilled, he hasn't gone through the training that Cody has, and Keyes doesn't have nearly as much equipment or armor. Cody is a frontline commander. Keyes stands on the bridge of a ship and orders his Lieutenants around, lol. I think that Cody would win.
Alan Frost Posted July 11, 2006 Posted July 11, 2006 I saw a wookie flatting a manga guard, but hunters would be a chalenge to a wokkie warrior. But if a wokkie has that rocket launcher in both hands, well it would be a quick funeral for the hunter. BUT WE ARE OFF TOPIC!!!
taclled Posted July 11, 2006 Posted July 11, 2006 Actually i think a hunter in a way is a fatter wookie to the halo universe they are both quite strong
taclled Posted July 11, 2006 Posted July 11, 2006 don know if i remember correctly they are taller than spartans although they are hunced over
Halo_92 Posted July 12, 2006 Posted July 12, 2006 9 Feet I'm getting Republic Commando tomorrow!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (or the next day)
Darth Hyukan Posted July 12, 2006 Posted July 12, 2006 It's totally worth it. Gameplay is short and multiplayer sucks, but I played it over and over again.
-Synthetik- Posted July 12, 2006 Posted July 12, 2006 wookies are a little more nimble, and thats whats required to kill a hunter, just get behind them, shoot em with an explosive tipped bowcaster bolt on the unarmored part and the job is done. Wookies are like smart gorillas and hunters are stupid bigger gorillas.
taclled Posted July 12, 2006 Posted July 12, 2006 I meant in hand to hand combat a wookie and a hunter wouldnt get to far just using strength
Darth Hyukan Posted July 12, 2006 Posted July 12, 2006 Yeah, they are pretty evenly matched. In a long run, the hunter would win with his armor and gun (to hit with, not to shoot), when a Wookiee has only his fists. I'm sure the fight would be pretty long, though.
TSR Posted July 12, 2006 Posted July 12, 2006 nah, the hunter would just squash the wookie with its shield thingy. Like it does to the marines, but only with more fur
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.