Dagobahn Eagle Posted July 8, 2006 Share Posted July 8, 2006 Family seals bedroom with plastic sheets and duct tape and die from lack of oxygen. Good job, Department of Homeland Security Suffocation:usa:! Damned good job indeed! Reminds me of when FOX "News" urged viewers to "stay inside [and not] eat or drink anything!":rolleyes:. What's next, I wonder. Your country's going to the dogs:(. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZBomber Posted July 8, 2006 Share Posted July 8, 2006 Dude.... its not their fault... its the ****in peoples fault... how stupid can you be to actually stop all sources of ventilation from getting into a room? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IG-64 Posted July 8, 2006 Share Posted July 8, 2006 You'd think someone would've gotten up and thought, hey, you know what, I can't freakin' breathe, I think I'll go open the window. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samnmax221 Posted July 8, 2006 Share Posted July 8, 2006 There is the wonderful personal responsibility factor, I wonder if they got a Darwin award? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BongoBob Posted July 8, 2006 Share Posted July 8, 2006 As much funa s it is to blame america or bush or government etc, this was their fault. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Datheus Posted July 8, 2006 Share Posted July 8, 2006 You'd think someone would've gotten up and thought, hey, you know what, I can't freakin' breathe, I think I'll go open the window. The problem is that it's gradual. I'm sure you've heard the whole "If you drop a frog in boiling water, it jumps out. If you turn up the heat, it cooks alive." Suffocating in that manner is different from simply holding your breath. A person can easily notice such a drastic change. You'd probably feel more and more tired and less and less oxygen was in your system. Also, keep in mind that these people were already asleep. Chances are it was actually a rather peacful death as far as death goes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Groovy Posted July 8, 2006 Share Posted July 8, 2006 This thread is getting packed up and shipped to the Senate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dagobahn Eagle Posted July 8, 2006 Author Share Posted July 8, 2006 So it did end up in the Senate after all, hm? Very well. Well, besides from the fact that if the authorities hadn't suggested they do they, they'd probably never have done it, it's not as stupid as it sounds, in my opinion. A bedroom does have a lot of oxygen, after all, and shouldn't run out even with several people inside. You have to admit, the idea of the AC sucking all the air out does sound a little far-fetched. Would you have believed it? So in my opinion, it comes down to the authorities giving an advice that was at best worthless, and at worst life-threatening. And as a side note, as Datheus said: It's a gradual thing. How exactly it feels to be awake in a room draining of oxygen I don't know, but if you're asleep, and the change is gradual enough, there's little chance you'll notice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samnmax221 Posted July 8, 2006 Share Posted July 8, 2006 I'm thinking if you wake up in a room with remarkably low oxygen (although there probebly wouldn't be enough for the brain to wake you up) you'de be too drowsy to get up anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edlib Posted July 8, 2006 Share Posted July 8, 2006 Um... these weren't even Americans: "In mid-March 2003 the Associated Press reported on the demise by suffocation of three Israeli Arabs (a woman and her two teenage sons) in the town of Kfar Kassem, all of whom had spent the night in a room of the family home which had been sealed with plastic sheeting and duct tape against a possible Iraqi chemical missile attack. Police said the three lost their lives because a coal-fueled heater in an adjacent room sucked oxygen from the room they were sleeping in, which was designed to stop air from entering but allowed air to escape. Around 5 a.m., the husband awoke and realized his wife and their two teens (ages 13 and 14) were not breathing, police said. Their two younger children (ages 3 and 4) survived." But I don't know anyone who ran out to grab duct tape and plastic sheeting after that recommendation, anyway. Besides, I live in the Northeast, where the majority of houses are a bit old and drafty to begin with... I very much doubt very much you could ever seal one of these types of homes well enough to ever make a difference. Although the more paranoid among us just might try... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rccar328 Posted July 10, 2006 Share Posted July 10, 2006 Last I heard, the reccomendation was to buy plastic sheeting and duct tape to be put up in the case of a chemical weapons attack...but seeing as how this was a family of "Israeli Arabs" (quoted from the Snopes article), I don't really see what Rumsfeld has to do with their deaths. And as far as it goes, which is more life-threatening: dying of suffocation in a plastic-sealed room, or dying from a chemical weapon attack? At least suffocation is gradual: you have some kind of chance that wind or natural dissipation will allow you to come out of your bubble before you die of suffocation. If you breathe in nerve gas, you're dead, period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Datheus Posted July 11, 2006 Share Posted July 11, 2006 Breathing is overrated anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ET Warrior Posted July 13, 2006 Share Posted July 13, 2006 which is more life-threatening: dying of suffocation in a plastic-sealed room, or dying from a chemical weapon attack?Last I checked...dying was dying. Death from suffocation and death from chemical weapons are both 100% fatal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rogue15 Posted July 13, 2006 Share Posted July 13, 2006 it's canada's fault. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rccar328 Posted July 13, 2006 Share Posted July 13, 2006 Last I checked...dying was dying. Death from suffocation and death from chemical weapons are both 100% fatal. All I was saying is that you have more of a chance of survival in the sealed room...it was just poorly worded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK-8252 Posted July 17, 2006 Share Posted July 17, 2006 Perhaps this Lewis Black quote serves this situation very well: "Our government told us we could protect ourselves from a CHEMICAL ATTACK... with duct tape. I think that a group of Americans should have been sent to Washington on our behalf. And they would take everyone, from the President on down, out for an afternoon of electroshock. Duct tape?! The only way duct tape helps is if you can get enough that you can wrap it around yourself and suffocate before the chemicals kill you." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.