Jump to content

Home

Math for fun thread


tk102

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Okay, here's me in action:

 

700/6 = 116.6(recurring), rounded off to 117

700 - 117 = 583, this the amount Mike pays in dollars.

583/5 = 116.6 :eyeraise:

Therefore, 583 - 116.6 = 466.4

 

Final Answer: $466.4. If that is right, this was easier than pie. :p

 

Close enough, if you don't round off until the end, your answer should be $466.66. But, you did it correctly, and probably still deserve full marks.

 

Your turn. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Using only lower case letters of the English alphabet, how many 4-letter "words" can be created using unique letters with at least one vowel(a,e,i,o,u,y) in each word? No other rules apply.

When I saw this thread I could only think of one four letter word with at least one vowel and no repetitions: "nerd" :xp: (j/k)

 

Sorry for the unorthodox method but I don't remember my math :p

 

Total words with 4 letters (26x25x24x23) - Total words with no vowels (20x19x18x17)

 

So the answer should be 242520 if I am correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Darth333 takes the short cut to the right answer! :D

 

Here's the long method:

 

Words with 1 vowel (V) in them can have the vowel appear in one of the 4 positions with the others being taken by consonants ©.

VCCC

CVCC

CCVC

CCCV

 

and there are 6 possible vowels. The first consonant has 20 possibilities, the 2nd has 19, and the 3rd has 18 so:

 

1 vowel words = (6*20*19*18) + (20*6*19*18) + (20*19*6*18) + (20*19*18*6) = 164160

 

2 vowel words:

VVCC

VCVC

VCCV

CVVC

CVCV

CCVV

 

six variations of (6*5*20*19) = 68400

 

3 vowel words:

VVVC

VVCV

VCVV

CVVV

 

4 variations of (6*5*4*20) = 9600

 

and 4 vowel words:

 

1 variation of 6*5*4*3 = 360

 

add them all up:

 

164160+68400+9600+360=242520 :xp:

 

I like D3's way better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

You have 50 coins from the USA totaling $10.00.

 

You have more nickels ($0.05) than pennies ($0.01), you have more dimes ($0.10) than nickels, and you have more quarters ($0.25) than dimes.

 

How many coins of each type do you have? (two answers)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's one! But you didn't show your work! :D

 

25q + 10d + 5n + p = 1000

q + d + n + p = 50

q > d > n > p

 

p must be divisible by 5 in order to get the nice round number of $10.00

 

Test: can p = 5?

 

 

pennies nickels dimes quarters COUNT VALUE

5 6 7 32 50 $9.05

 

No! Even if we maximize the number of quarters, we can't reach $10 with 5 pennies in play.

 

Therefore pennies = 0.

 

Now we can easily reach $10...

 

pennies nickels dimes quarters COUNT VALUE

0 1 2 37 50 $12.00

 

 

We'll try shifting the coins from quarters to dimes until we fall below $10.00

 

pennies nickels dimes quarters COUNT VALUE

0 1 16 33 50 $9.90

 

So we know we need at least 34 quarters. Try that

 

q=34 (VALUE = $8.50)

 

n+d = 16

5n+10d = 150

5(16-d) + 10d = 150

80 + 5d = 150

d = 14

n = 2

 

 

pennies nickels dimes quarters COUNT VALUE

0 2 14 34 50 $10.00

 

 

 

What about 35 quarters?

 

q=35 (VALUE = $8.75)

 

n+d = 15

5n+10d = 125

5(15-d) + 10d = 125

75 + 5d = 125

d = 10

n = 5

 

 

pennies nickels dimes quarters COUNT VALUE

0 5 10 35 50 $10.00

 

 

 

What about 36 quarters?

 

q=36 (VALUE = $9.00)

 

n+d = 14

5n+10d = 100

5(14-d) + 10d = 100

70 + 5d = 100

d = 6

n = 8 ! no d must be greater than n.

 

 

 

That is all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To determine the contribution of the 480V, we isolate it by opening the current source and shorting the other voltage source...

 

 

100 140

+-/\/\/\---/\/\/\---+------+

| | |

-+- | \ 150

480V | /

-+- | \

| | |

+-------------------+------+

 

 

 

240

+----------/\/\/\---+

| |

-+- |

480V |

-+- |

| |

+-------------------+

 

480V through 240ohms = 2A

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at the 2nd voltage source

 

<----

720V through 240ohm = -3A

100 140

+-/\/\/\---/\/\/\---+------+

| | |

| --- \ 150

| 720V /

| --- \

| | |

+-------------------+------+

 

 

The current source is a little trickier. Need to find the equivalent voltage.

 

1/R = 1/R1 + 1/R2

1/R = 1/100 + 1/140

R = 58.33

12A * 58.33 Ohm = 700V

100 140

+-/\/\/\-+-/\/\/\---+------+

| | | |

| ^ | \ 150

| 12A | /

| ^ | \

| | | |

+--------+----------+------+

 

 

58.333 58.333

+-/\/\/\---+ +-/\/\/\---+

| | | |

^ | ---- |

12A | ----> 700V |

^ | ---- |

| | | |

+----------+ +----------+

 

 

 

100 140 700V through 140 ohms = 5A

+-/\/\/\-+-/\/\/\---+------+

| | | |

| ---- | \ 150

| 700V | /

| ---- | \

| | | |

+--------+----------+------+

 

Io: 2A + -3A + 5A = 4A

 

 

 

P.S. Thank you Rhett. I completely forgot all of this stuff the minute I left my EE210 class. Good to know part of my brain could pick it back up again. I'll see if I can come up with another problem unless someone else posts one first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a hot summer's day a guy selling snow-cones runs out of cones and has to use paper cups instead. If the cups are the same height and same radius as the cones, and the snow-cones cost $0.75 each, how much should he charge for the snow-cups?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Via trigonometry:

 

tan(theta) = 54.663/36.7

theta = arctan(54.663/36.7)

theta = 56.123°

 

sin(theta) = 54.663/x

x = 54.663 / sin(theta)

x = 65.84

 

or by Pythagoras:

x = sqrt(36.7^2 + 54.663^2) = 65.84

 

but what about the snow-cone guy? :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

(Pi)(R^2)(H) = area of cylinder

 

(1/3)(Pi)(R^2)(H) = area of cone

 

So a comparable cylinder is holding three times as much.

 

(.75)(3) = $2.25

 

So the answer is that he darn well better still be charging 75 cents because there's no way in heck I'm paying that much for a snow cone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a hot summer's day a guy selling snow-cones runs out of cones and has to use paper cups instead. If the cups are the same height and same radius as the cones, and the snow-cones cost $0.75 each, how much should he charge for the snow-cups?

 

Assuming that the paper cups are cylindric and having on mind that a cylinder have a volume that's 3 times greater than that of a cone, I would say:

 

Cylinder radius and height = x

Cones radius and height = x

 

Therefore, they're equal. But the cylinder got a volume 3x greater.

 

If logic applies, then he should sell the cups 3 times more expensive.

 

Answer: $2.25

 

Edit: Oh, I didn't saw Rhett's reply...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah you're both right of course. I always thought it was strange that a cone was 1/3 the volume of the equivalent cylinder. After all, if you draw a rectangle and then draw and isosceles triangle inside it, that triangle has 1/2 the area of the rectangle. But if you spin that configuration on the axis, the volume encompassed by the triangle (now a cone) is 1/3 the volume encompassed by the rectangle (now a cylinder). Kind of spooky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a hot summer's day a guy selling snow-cones runs out of cones and has to use paper cups instead. If the cups are the same height and same radius as the cones, and the snow-cones cost $0.75 each, how much should he charge for the snow-cups?
The invisible hand of the free market will, like the hand of God Himself, set the price of a paper cup at its optimal price and ensure the that our way of life will not be threatened by the sanguine tentacles of Communism :carms:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To 1 decimal place? Might as well use trial and error to get that rather than use the cumbersome cubic equation.

 

4^3 = 64

3^3 = 27

 

so we know it's between 3 and 4.

 

3.4 -> 42.7

3.3 -> 39.23

 

so 3.3 close enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To 1 decimal place? Might as well use trial and error to get that rather than use the cumbersome cubic equation.

 

4^3 = 64

3^3 = 27

 

so we know it's between 3 and 4.

 

3.4 -> 42.7

3.3 -> 39.23

 

so 3.3 close enough.

Actually, I did find that out (with the help of Microsoft Windows Calculator), but I thought trial and error was evil in real maths. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...