MORE VEHICLES AND BETTER GRAPHICS (duh)

[darkjedimonkey]

Vehicles

 

I feel limited on vehicles on both single and multiplayer....

I want more than 7 snowspeeders on Hoth. 17 would be more like it.

More than just two Republic Gunships and AT-TE's on Genoisis.

bigger hangars on spaceships

more at at more at st more at te more at ta etc etc

 

Graphics

In BF1 they managed to get plants on Theed etc

but on other maps there was barely any realness to the whole thing

more than just a painted sky please.

sort of like Halo graphics only better

[deathclone]

in other words for this to happen there gonna need WAY bugger maps

[darkjedimonkey]

not exactly

more vehicles would not mean bigger maps

graphics would though....

[GeneralPloKoon]

How would graphics mean bigger maps??? More vehicles would equal bigger maps, imagine Hoth exactly the same with 17 snowspeeders, woah! I can't see anything in the sky!!!

[darkjedimonkey]

hahahahahahahaha

i think 17 snowspeeders would be sweet along with the actual number of at ats.

of course more vehicles would turn the tide of battle with just 200 per army

so more units would have to be involved to equalize that battle

[dr.w]

starfighters should be re-added to bf3 like in bf1. it isn't as cool with just hoth as the only place with flying vehicles. and they should have larger maps and more troops on each side (with certain advantages for each side like the empire having better weapons but the rebels having better soldiers)

[TKT101]

Yes I agree with more vehicles for certian maps.

[Bs|Rogue52]

yes but for that many tanks/vehicles you might as well forget any soldier type, games have been succsesfull without so many vehicles, maybe expand on space, but i like the current number, anymore would be obnoxious and i would avoid servers with those maps, id rather they put there effort into better hit registry and realsitic enviroment.

[darkjedimonkey]

true

[NL_Sudentor]

yes but for that many tanks/vehicles you might as well forget any soldier type, games have been succsesfull without so many vehicles, maybe expand on space, but i like the current number, anymore would be obnoxious and i would avoid servers with those maps, id rather they put there effort into better hit registry and realsitic enviroment.

 

 

Yes you are right, but maybe they can make vehicles optional. And the numbers too.

[Stormtrooper117]

I think that they should include vehicles but MAKE THEM ACTUALLY DESTROYABLE!!! It takes too long to destroy the jeep-like vehicles with a rocketlauncher. Small vehicles should only need one hit

[NL_Sudentor]

I think that they should include vehicles but MAKE THEM ACTUALLY DESTROYABLE!!! It takes too long to destroy the jeep-like vehicles with a rocketlauncher. Small vehicles should only need one hit

 

There aren't jeep like vehicles in the games!!!

They all have armor

[Micahc]

I think it does only take 1 rocket to destroy a speeder....

[littleman794]

ya, speeders cant have that much armor or else they wouldn't be so speedy...

[NL_Sudentor]

Yeah but speeder isn't a jeep like vehicle

[littleman794]

no, it is more like a dirt bike type vehicle....except faster with guns....

[darkjedimonkey]

ok. more vehicles.

[DeathKnight23]

ok. more vehicles.

 

yeah we get the point

[darkjedimonkey]

yeah but.... more vehicles means all kinds of vehicles. even gigantic battleships. god. i hope bf3 doesnt suck

[Gemini_Thunder]

More vehicles would have to equal larger maps. You wouldn't want a bunch of vehicles on a tiny map would you?

[darkjedimonkey]

How would graphics mean bigger maps??? More vehicles would equal bigger maps, imagine Hoth exactly the same with 17 snowspeeders, woah! I can't see anything in the sky!!!

 

actually some one already talked about that problem.

[RC-1183]

ya i say more vehicles but not to many like depending on the map size would determine the amount of vehicles same with troops think about it if u had a HUGE map and only 200 troops it would be too easy to get killed cuz they r spread out to far but more troops would be cool and make it more realistic but wat if they added a RTS type thing too were u could buy more troops if u felt u had insuffeciat numbers but there would have to a limit say 2000??? but u have to remember if they added all this it would take a lot longer for the game to come out

[jawathehutt]

this is not an rts, or rts hybrid game, from now on, lets just ban rts related ideas.

[Bs|Rogue52]

this is not an rts, or rts hybrid game, from now on, lets just ban rts related ideas.

 

 

I agree, please go to the EAW forums for those ideas.

[GeneralPloKoon]

Indeed.