Ctrl Alt Del Posted January 14, 2008 Share Posted January 14, 2008 Well, generally people try to hide murders. But I guess that's just stupid. Nope, just overrated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Det. Bart Lasiter Posted January 14, 2008 Share Posted January 14, 2008 Nope, just overrated. Do elaborate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corinthian Posted January 14, 2008 Share Posted January 14, 2008 She probably apologized because she was threatened with losing her job. Patton apologized to his troops after slapping a shell-shocked soldier around, although I really doubt he was genuinely sorry about it. I'd say Who Cares, but I know who cares. I wonder what the reaction would have been if she had said something like "I bet the other golfers are wanting to take him out back and shoot him right now." Or some other, similar suggestion that golfers would want to kill him. Probably different. If she had said hang him, they probably would have shrugged. It's all this tyranny, the restrictions on words that don't even matter. People need to grow thicker skins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommycat Posted January 14, 2008 Share Posted January 14, 2008 Lynch mobs existed in areas not exclusive to hanging blacks. They existed during the old west. Lynch mobs would form to hang a criminal before the trial. Street justice in a sense. I'm offended by the labeling of lynching as a wholely black thing. As if only a black person can be lynched. Besides Tiger also happens to have another ethnicity in him. He wasn't offended, it's up to him to decide if it was offensive as he was the target. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jae Onasi Posted January 14, 2008 Share Posted January 14, 2008 She probably apologized because she was threatened with losing her job. I heard an interview on a sports radio show--this woman actually is good friends with Tiger and they've known each other a long time. She never meant any harm by it, though it was a phenomenally poor choice of verbiage, and Tiger knew what she meant and thus wasn't offended. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ctrl Alt Del Posted January 14, 2008 Share Posted January 14, 2008 I heard an interview on a sports radio show--this woman actually is good friends with Tiger and they've known each other a long time. She never meant any harm by it, though it was a phenomenally poor choice of verbiage, and Tiger knew what she meant and thus wasn't offended. If she was a friend then the only problem was that her comment was out of place. She could have said it on a friendly, particular talk, on a pub table, not on a public space. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Sitherino Posted January 14, 2008 Share Posted January 14, 2008 Why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corinthian Posted January 14, 2008 Share Posted January 14, 2008 That's my point, Jae. She apologized for no reason, the only people who were offended were the ones who had no right to be offended. The only logical reason she apologized is, logically, because she was ordered to do so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ctrl Alt Del Posted January 14, 2008 Share Posted January 14, 2008 Why? Because not every watcher is her friend, obviously. And many tend to be rather sensitives about something or another. If you deal with someone for enough time, you'll eventually know what you can/can't say on his/her presence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weiser_Cain Posted January 14, 2008 Share Posted January 14, 2008 I had to read that twice, yes it's offensive, yes to more that just tiger woods. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Sitherino Posted January 14, 2008 Share Posted January 14, 2008 Because not every watcher is her friend, obviously. And many tend to be rather sensitives about something or another. If you deal with someone for enough time, you'll eventually know what you can/can't say on his/her presence. But she's not talking about them, they have no relation to her comment. If anyone is offended by it, then they might as well be offended by the people on mTV. "Yo, I'd just like to give a shout out to my homegirl Laquisha. WHAT UP BITCH?!" There's no reason to get offended over a general statement made in regards to a friend, as a joke, that the friend had no issue with. If anything, it'd probably be the asian side of him that's offended. The Chinese have been persecuted far longer than the blacks, and I'm willing to bet lynched more as well. However, none of that is the issue, since the only offensive thing about the statement is the idea of people killing, namely over a golf title. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ctrl Alt Del Posted January 14, 2008 Share Posted January 14, 2008 There's no reason to get offended over a general statement made in regards to a friend, as a joke, that the friend had no issue with. I don't disagree, but some people would. Actually, I defend the idea that almost everything should be subject for jokes (No kidding). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Sitherino Posted January 14, 2008 Share Posted January 14, 2008 If something is funny, it's funny, you shouldn't be able to fault someone for that. And who knows, he probably cracked up when he first heard it. I highly doubt he chuckled then went "Hey, wait a minute. I'm half-black, that means a part of mean is an angry militant protestor". No, he probably laughed his ass off and said something to the effect of, "Yeah, but ****'s good..." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rogue Nine Posted January 14, 2008 Author Share Posted January 14, 2008 The only logical reason she apologized is, logically, because she was ordered to do so. Or maybe because she realized that she said her comment without thinking it through and apologized for making an insensitive faux pas? I'm pretty sure no one had to force her to make the apology. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ctrl Alt Del Posted January 14, 2008 Share Posted January 14, 2008 I'm pretty sure no one had to force her to make the apology. Independently of her intentions, she sure though that resigning and apologizing would make things look better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rogue Nine Posted January 14, 2008 Author Share Posted January 14, 2008 Eh? There have been no indications of her resigning anywhere. The Golf Channel suspended her, yes, but that was the extent of the disciplinary action. (Curiously, they had initially stated there would be no such punishment, but obviously went back, presumably from pressure from people like Al Sharpton). And yeah, apologizing did make things better, regardless of whether she meant it or not. Tiger accepts her apology, so that's good enough for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.