KISS Army Posted January 19, 2002 Share Posted January 19, 2002 From this thread: http://209.126.167.135/showthread.php?s=&threadid=30689 ******** German PC Action mag (currently no.3 saleswise...) has a nice, 2 page preview of JK II in it's newest issue (out today ). Here are some pure facts, some might be known, others maybe not ... - 20 levels in singleplayer (some very big according to text) - 10 weapons (so the one thread about weapons seemed to be right) - up to 64 (!) players in multiplayer .... ************** I just want everyone to know that there are "over" 20 levels and "over" 10 weapons. Keep in mind, too, that 64 players is the theoretical limit of players in Quake 3, assuming everyone has uber hardware to run the server and the bandwidth to support it. I think 32 players is a more reasonable estimate and I think that in most games 16 or 24 is more realistic/practical. Thought I'd give everyone a "heads up." Have a great weekend, guys and gals! --Kenn Kenn Hoekstra Raven Software Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Obi Kwan Posted January 19, 2002 Share Posted January 19, 2002 Thanks Kenn ; I did think that 64 was pretty big. Still, 24 beats JK's 4 player games! (on the zone) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rat Boy Posted January 19, 2002 Share Posted January 19, 2002 "Over"? You mean you don't know for certain?????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MRJ Posted January 19, 2002 Share Posted January 19, 2002 Obi Kwan- you called him Ken- it's Kenn... Well, it's been nice knowin' ya (remember, he knows John Mullins...) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StormHammer Posted January 19, 2002 Share Posted January 19, 2002 Originally posted by MRJ Obi Kwan- you called him Ken- it's Kenn... Well, it's been nice knowin' ya (remember, he knows John Mullins...) ROFL... Thanks for the Heads Up, Kenn. About the levels and guns...this is good news. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GonkH8er Posted January 19, 2002 Share Posted January 19, 2002 I think John Mullins died so many digital deaths at the hands of us, he'd be afraid to come near us for fear of us blowing away half his head with a deagle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZeroXcape Posted January 19, 2002 Share Posted January 19, 2002 Aye, thanks Kenn. I'll mention this first thing tommorow morning on the site, (got to let the new screens post sink in some.) I think the last headline you made was "Kenn Mentions JKII," so I guess this one will have to be "Kenn Corrects Community." Thanks, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Obi Kwan Posted January 19, 2002 Share Posted January 19, 2002 ahh my sincerest appologies KENN and MRJ... and any other Ravenites browsing this thread! I think just for that, i should be demoted to Gungan status;) (actually, with my number of posts that may be a promotion...) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JR2000Z Posted January 19, 2002 Share Posted January 19, 2002 Kinda hard playing mulitplayer games with 64 players without experiencing lag ; especially games like JK2. Thanks for the info Ken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GonkH8er Posted January 19, 2002 Share Posted January 19, 2002 Originally posted by Obi Kwan I think just for that, i should be demoted to Gungan status;) If that's what you want Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZeroXcape Posted January 19, 2002 Share Posted January 19, 2002 Originally posted by JR2000Z Kinda hard playing mulitplayer games with 64 players without experiencing lag ; especially games like JK2. Thanks for the info Ken. There's always LAN Parties... Speaking of which, anyone hitting up <a href="http://www.lanwar.com/">Lan War</a> this weekend? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GonkH8er Posted January 19, 2002 Share Posted January 19, 2002 Originally posted by JR2000Z Thanks for the info Ken. IT'S KENN! KENN KENN KENN! hehehe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JR2000Z Posted January 19, 2002 Share Posted January 19, 2002 Originally posted by GonkH8er IT'S KENN! KENN KENN KENN! hehehe I'm sure Kenn also has trouble spelling his name. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GonkH8er Posted January 19, 2002 Share Posted January 19, 2002 yeah, when he was like.... 2 maybe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bartolo_JCS Posted January 19, 2002 Share Posted January 19, 2002 TY Sir Ravenite Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JR2000Z Posted January 19, 2002 Share Posted January 19, 2002 Actually, I might call him Kenny for the time being. Easier to remember and to spell correctly. (My 5000th post! A-1 SUPAR! :) ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Com Raven Posted January 19, 2002 Share Posted January 19, 2002 Sorry Kenn, but that's what they wrote .... But according to text they were in California to see the game, so I thought they'd be right about it ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agen Posted January 19, 2002 Share Posted January 19, 2002 What did i tell yas I told u all the mag's i read had over 10 but noooooooo... u go believe some german mag!!! i deserve.... a........ roll and sausage.... who's gonna give me it.....? ken or MJR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainRAVE Posted January 19, 2002 Share Posted January 19, 2002 Well im glad someone corrected it. Dont worry terminator........noone believes anyone regarding JK2 information......its not just you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agen Posted January 19, 2002 Share Posted January 19, 2002 what!!! u mean no-one believed me when i said i stole a copy of jk2 and i'm playing it now!!! Damn you people! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainRAVE Posted January 19, 2002 Share Posted January 19, 2002 if only that were true Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest X-Vector Posted January 19, 2002 Share Posted January 19, 2002 Originally posted by KISS Army I think 32 players is a more reasonable estimate and I think that in most games 16 or 24 is more realistic/practical. Does that mean having 32 players in JO MP will be unrealistic/unpractical for gameplay or technical reasons? I'd expect it to be the former, because there are plenty of 32-player matches to be had in RTCW MP, which is also a Q3 engine title. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainRAVE Posted January 19, 2002 Share Posted January 19, 2002 Can you imagine how big mp levels would have to be for 64 players. Even a T3 connection would struggle. Even 32 players seems alot for one level......in JK anyway. Maybe these mp levels will be HUGE .......I hope so anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swoosh Posted January 19, 2002 Share Posted January 19, 2002 I don't really think I'd want to see 63 other Jedi running around a level...that would pretty much eliminate lightsaber dueling and create a world like in Q3 with mass numbers of deaths and there's no strategy except run and swing! I think 8 or 16 will provide a great game and keep the multiplayer games similar to those of Jedi Knight. But, in no means is 64 bad...you might as well support that many if the technology permits it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Com Raven Posted January 19, 2002 Share Posted January 19, 2002 Originally posted by CaptainRAVE Can you imagine how big mp levels would have to be for 64 players. Even a T3 connection would struggle. Even 32 players seems alot for one level......in JK anyway. Maybe these mp levels will be HUGE .......I hope so anyway. Well, with a good connection 32's no prob in RtCW With good server it can be as good as 30-40 ping with dsl ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.