DiRtY $oUtH™ Posted November 29, 2002 Share Posted November 29, 2002 So which came first? The chicken or the egg? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darklighter Posted November 29, 2002 Share Posted November 29, 2002 The plattypus...sorry, wrong thread... ;)lol I don't know. You need an egg for a chicken, and a chicken for an egg. One had to happen first. I couldn't begin to guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DiRtY $oUtH™ Posted November 29, 2002 Author Share Posted November 29, 2002 Well, heres what I think...if evolution actually happened..not necessarily in humans but in other mammals...then lets say some animal that would eventually evolve into the chicken laid eggs and like any other stage of evolution, it had to eventually change. That means that maybe one day, one of the eggs hatched and it was "different". Wouldn't that mean that the egg came first? Cuz the animal that layed the egg wasn't necessarily a chicken yet. Thats what I think... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rogue15 Posted November 29, 2002 Share Posted November 29, 2002 according to creation, the chicken came first, unless that's not a chicken egg you're talking about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DiRtY $oUtH™ Posted November 29, 2002 Author Share Posted November 29, 2002 Yes, according to creationism. Which I agree with..I believe in creationism. But I want to look at it from the "Scientific" point of view...cuz then that chicken would have had to come from an egg...am I right? But the that egg had to have come from a chicken...and so on and so on... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpYzEr Posted November 29, 2002 Share Posted November 29, 2002 I think the chicken came first because you need a chicken to lay an egg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DiRtY $oUtH™ Posted November 29, 2002 Author Share Posted November 29, 2002 ok..but where did that chicken come from? (scientifically) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wes Marrakesh Posted November 29, 2002 Share Posted November 29, 2002 I think they came at the same time, time measured in years. You see... if in certain places something hatched into a chicken at month 3, there might already be a chicken laying an egg in another place. So.... chicken in place 2 lays a chicken egg in month 4 and the chicken in place 1 is growing up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leXX Posted November 29, 2002 Share Posted November 29, 2002 The Egg The zygote cell is the only place where DNA mutations could produce a new animal, and the zygote cell is housed in the chicken's egg. So, the egg must have come first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DiRtY $oUtH™ Posted November 29, 2002 Author Share Posted November 29, 2002 How long were you looking in a science book for that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpYzEr Posted November 29, 2002 Share Posted November 29, 2002 Begun, the flame war has. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DiRtY $oUtH™ Posted November 29, 2002 Author Share Posted November 29, 2002 lol....it could be avoided..the problem is that I have no idea what this damn stupid girl has against me...she goes to my threads and says they suck. Why does she reply to them then? Thats what I would like to know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leXX Posted November 29, 2002 Share Posted November 29, 2002 I'm not gonna lower myself to his level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C'jais Posted November 29, 2002 Share Posted November 29, 2002 Originally posted by leXX The Egg The zygote cell is the only place where DNA mutations could produce a new animal, and the zygote cell is housed in the chicken's egg. So, the egg must have come first. ^^What she said^^ This is the least wrong reply so far - IE the right. Although I couldn't have said that stuff about the zygote cell, this is what I would've said. Where do new races originate from? From DNA changes. Those changes do not happen on a born individual, but rather in meiosis, IE the egg. This belongs in the Evolution thread if we're gonna keep arguing like this, btw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leXX Posted November 29, 2002 Share Posted November 29, 2002 Originally posted by Darth Yoda85 lol....it could be avoided..the problem is that I have no idea what this damn stupid girl has against me...she goes to my threads and says they suck. Why does she reply to them then? Thats what I would like to know. YOu need to chill out. We at the swamp never take anything too seriously, you obviously havn't learnt that lesson yet. We don't swear at each other and we don't constantly troll like you. You do nothing but post sexist threads and comment on everthing ppl say siarcastly. A word of advice, be nicer or you are going to make more enemies than you have already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arreat Posted November 29, 2002 Share Posted November 29, 2002 Originally posted by leXX The Egg The zygote cell is the only place where DNA mutations could produce a new animal, and the zygote cell is housed in the chicken's egg. So, the egg must have come first. well i watched a show about chicken and sh!t and they claimed that the chicken came 1st (slowly walks out of flame war) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luc Solar Posted November 29, 2002 Share Posted November 29, 2002 I admit I didn't read the other posts, so shoot me if I'm being repetitive. I know this is supposed to be a tough question that cannot be answered, but...man...it's so obvious! No wait....umm...****! I lost my train of thought! Damn weed! I mean...never mind. Oh well, you'll just have to take my word for it: The egg was first. BUT it wasn't a "chicken's-egg", though. (animals aren't that picky, if you've noticed) The egg of the first chicken is the first "egg-of-a-chicken". So the egg was first, but the chicken was before the first hen's egg. Got it? Good. Next question please. But don't give me the old "what's the meaning of life?", 'cause that's way too easy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C'jais Posted November 29, 2002 Share Posted November 29, 2002 Originally posted by Luc Solar But don't give me the old "what's the meaning of life?", 'cause that's way too easy. What's the meaning of life, then? To survive and reproduce? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gorganfloss Posted November 29, 2002 Share Posted November 29, 2002 Ummmmmmmm I dont think the chicken just appeared so Id have to say the egg came first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DiRtY $oUtH™ Posted November 29, 2002 Author Share Posted November 29, 2002 Ummmmmmmm I dont think the chicken just appeared so Id have to say the egg came first. Ah yes...a wise man arises... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C'jais Posted November 29, 2002 Share Posted November 29, 2002 Originally posted by Gorgan Ummmmmmmm I dont think the chicken just appeared so Id have to say the egg came first. Good choice, and reasonable explanation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mima kake Posted November 29, 2002 Share Posted November 29, 2002 Maybe it was the rooster who was there first:p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jed Posted November 29, 2002 Share Posted November 29, 2002 Hasn't this idea already come up for a thread? I'd like to know why we need to continually go through this thread until it ends in a flame war. And Mima, I like your answer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redwing Posted November 29, 2002 Share Posted November 29, 2002 Which chicken? Seriously, whether you believe God created the animal kingdom or it evolved on its own, you know that chicken as we know it now didn't start out that way, domesticated as it is. Anyone who understands biology knows this. So I say the egg comes first. Darth Yoda, what's with the unprovoked attack? leXX didn't say anything against you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShockV1.89 Posted November 29, 2002 Share Posted November 29, 2002 Originally posted by Redwing Darth Yoda, what's with the unprovoked attack? leXX didn't say anything against you Insecurities in certain inadequacies, perhaps? Ah well. I believe the egg came first, although it probably wasnt a chicken egg at the time. (as others have said) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.