Crazy_Ivan Posted March 3, 2003 Share Posted March 3, 2003 I personally think George W. Bush is taking this country down the tubes. His right-wing ideas are keeping us Americans ignorant of the economy and wants to war Iraq so our economy can help itself. Ive said my opinion. Whats yours? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reborn22 Posted March 3, 2003 Share Posted March 3, 2003 I think Bush is doing a fine job and Clinton was pathetic to give China nuclear technology, he also did some stupid things. And Bush is going to Iraq because of Saddam Huessen. (Need I say why) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nitro Posted March 3, 2003 Share Posted March 3, 2003 Slick Willy for life. *cough*Stupid Americans*cough* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kstar__2 Posted March 3, 2003 Share Posted March 3, 2003 bill clinton was better, why? democraty man, progression! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ckcsaber Posted March 3, 2003 Share Posted March 3, 2003 Bush is doing what needs to be done. Clinton sucked ass (maybe even literally too:eek: ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C'jais Posted March 3, 2003 Share Posted March 3, 2003 Whatever Clinton did, he didn't get the honour of starting WW3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kain Posted March 3, 2003 Share Posted March 3, 2003 Clinton, all the way. Bush is too war monger-like and is obsessed with picking up where daddy left off. Clinton was more worried about the economy, and that should be the President's main focus. Bush spent all the money Clinton was able to collect for the National Debt*or whatever his reason was*and he spent an excess of that, thus knocking us further in debt. I sincerly hope and am 100% sure that Bush will not get re-Elected. If he does...*shaking head* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C'jais Posted March 3, 2003 Share Posted March 3, 2003 America is in debt to way over its ears. It's only a matter of time before the arab world sees how useless it is to cling to the dollar. The second gulf war is partly an attempt at preventing OPEC from switching to the euro as the currency of choice. When USA's economy goes down with a boom, it's not gonna be pretty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
obi Posted March 3, 2003 Share Posted March 3, 2003 I think they are both morons, but that's just my opinion.(Bush being the lesser moron slightly) All I remember about Clinton is a scandel, and the only way I'll remember Bush is because of a war with Iraq. I'm not a real huge talker on politics. Maybe I should be president,no? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ratmjedi Posted March 4, 2003 Share Posted March 4, 2003 Originally posted by C'jais Whatever Clinton did, he didn't get the honour of starting WW3. I like that Cjais. I think that Clinton was the better president. SO he **cked up when it came to him having an afair but atleast didn't **ck upthe country. Bush has not done very well and it looks like we are back in the days of being in conflict's again like his daddy had us in. Bush is not going to get relected and I can put my entire life and money on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FunClown Posted March 16, 2003 Share Posted March 16, 2003 Don't worry, Bush legally can't get re-elected, he can only serve a maximum of two terms as President. I don't really know who I would say is better. Bush does seem a bit weird though. Its like, if you support him in one war your his best friend. If you don't support him fully or have second thoughts about another war your his all time worst enemy. Sounds like talk-back radio to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GonkH8er Posted March 16, 2003 Share Posted March 16, 2003 Clinton was by far the better president, even with the Lewinsky scandal. He's 100 times smarter than Bush will ever be, and everyone knows it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
obi Posted March 16, 2003 Share Posted March 16, 2003 Originally posted by FunClown Don't worry, Bush legally can't get re-elected, he can only serve a maximum of two terms as President. He uh..er......um.....this is only his first term. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Groovy Posted March 16, 2003 Share Posted March 16, 2003 Originally posted by obi-wan13 I think they are both morons, but that's just my opinion.(Bush being the lesser moron slightly) All I remember about Clinton is a scandel, and the only way I'll remember Bush is because of a war with Iraq. I'm not a real huge talker on politics. Maybe I should be president,no? Oh what the Hell, I'll vote for ya... *starts up campaign for obi-wan13* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FunClown Posted March 17, 2003 Share Posted March 17, 2003 He uh..er......um.....this is only his first term. Sorry, I remember the voting in 2000, and thought he was voted in again recently. I was wondering a bit why the voting seemed a bit early though I must admit, I don't really follow US politics to closely, but he seems to be on the news every day now. Would someone be able to chime me into what the last vote was for and the one in 2000? I'm confused now. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Groovy Posted March 17, 2003 Share Posted March 17, 2003 Bah.... He only won by a recount... The newspapers were so happy to have Bush as president, they printed the headlines up premature. Further proof that the media is the tool of the Republican party. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ioshee Posted March 18, 2003 Share Posted March 18, 2003 Originally posted by Darth Groovy ...Further proof that the media is the tool of the Republican party. You are joking aren't you? You just for got to put a J/K or a right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arán Posted March 18, 2003 Share Posted March 18, 2003 I Bill Clinton was better! Just like Kstar_2:D Plus Clinton is in the lead in the poll:o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C'jais Posted March 20, 2003 Share Posted March 20, 2003 Originally posted by ioshee You are joking aren't you? You just for got to put a J/K or a right? C'mon. The press is acting as the lapdogs of the president. When confronted with evidence of the US spying on UN members, "it was nothing serious". (if it was even mentioned) When confronted with evidence of the US torturing two POWs to death, "it was nothing serious". When confronted with evidence of the US using forged evidence as the cassus belli to attack Iraq, "it was an accident". Wake up, please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShadowTemplar Posted March 20, 2003 Share Posted March 20, 2003 Clinton, big time... Why? Well he's the least reactionary of the pair (being an American el Prez, he had to be reactionary). Admittedly, though, saying that someone is less reactionary than G. W. Bush (not to be confused with GW) isn't really saying much. But seriously, we have a country here where liberal means left-wing... Boy, you're (the US) a century behind on things... Most things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
griff38 Posted March 21, 2003 Share Posted March 21, 2003 Well this is an easy one, Clinton had alot of bull**** happen on his watch, but there is no comparison. Something my wife pointed out to me recently about Clinton having scandalous sex in the WhiteHouse.............. The only people who give a Good blankety blank about that are just jealous nobody has ever smoked their cigar! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CagedCrado Posted March 22, 2003 Share Posted March 22, 2003 Also remember clinton is one of the reasons for all of this. BTW the US is the world leader so you are either like us or you just well, arent. And everybody tries to be like the US, or well, you are sad(dam). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eldritch Posted March 23, 2003 Share Posted March 23, 2003 I had to go with Slick Willie. Every time I see Bush, it looks like he's struggling to comprehend something, like he really has no idea what's going on. He looks like a kid who's pretending to be president. I think that the president should be intelligent - and even if Clinton wasn't discrete about his extramarital expeditions, he still was a Rhodes scholar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShadowTemplar Posted March 24, 2003 Share Posted March 24, 2003 Originally posted by CagedCrado BTW the US is the world leader so you are either like us or you just well, arent. And everybody tries to be like the US, or well, you are sad(dam). Case-book imperialism. It's gonna hurt when you hit the dirt. And I'd rather face an angry Carnifex than the turmoil that'll erupt when the rest of the world realises the simple fact that at some point the US will be out-smarted, out-manouvered, and out-developed by Europe, Caucasia, and the Far East... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chastan Posted March 25, 2003 Share Posted March 25, 2003 clinton is a lying scumbag worthless piece of crap he had nothing to do with the "Great economy" and even if he did, it was just a bunch of B.S. anyway artificially inflated stocks, bad accounting... all happened under his term... oh yeah it started to go sour at the end of his term... Everybody complains about how his affair was covered in the media... well nobody complains about how his dirty politics were not covered in the media... apparently he did a good job at brainwashing the rest of the world too at least Bush doesn't have the charisma to be able to hide anything Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.