Jump to content

Home

Has mankind visited the moon?


Zoom Rabbit

Are there human footprints on the moon?  

45 members have voted

  1. 1. Are there human footprints on the moon?

    • Yes. We have all seen the pictures.
      24
    • No. Those footprints were left on a sound stage.
      5
    • The moon is covered with human footprints left by a previous fallen civilization.
      1
    • No, but there are Martian footprints there.
      1
    • Yes, if you consider bigfoot prints to be human.
      0
    • Zoom Rabbit's footprints are on the moon.
      6
    • The moon itself is a hoax.
      8


Recommended Posts

Here's a link to a website that theorizes that the US never sent manned missions to the moon during the Apollo program:

 

http://www.moonmovie.com/15things.html

 

So, what do YOU guys think? :dozey: Given this hairless monkey's fifteen 'reasons' why the moon landings were nothing more than an elaborate hoax, should we really re-examine what we all learned in school?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 151
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I believe we never went to the moon but not picking any of those on the poll...non of them are good lol...who says their are foot prints up there at all......

 

"edit"

 

Never mind...guess I can do sound stage 8/

 

 

This is one thread I would not get involved in...I did on one forum once...but it leads to really REALLY bad flaming lol....I hate when people go off about oh that is stupid when they have never looked at any of the reasons why we did not go....I look at it like they don't have a right to an opinion if you don't have all relevant information

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ohhh nother crazy thread by Zoomy...Actaully this one makes sense.

 

Everything I've ben taught in school is a lie. Like Columbus day...We were told that was the day Columbus discoverd America...

 

Yeah he didn't even make it to America.... What a lie

 

So the Moon probably dosn't even exist...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by RoguePhotonic

oh the moon is very real...just never been there....it makes sense...was a race to get to the moon so we set ourselves ahead by faking it.....why would we want to go to it anyway?...it's a big rock...nothing more..

 

A big sexy rock mind you ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, right...

I can guarantee they just made this up to make money for themselves.

 

What about all the people who was working at NASA? Didn't they know anything about it?

If this is true, they would. And how to make thousands of people to be quiet, when they can make millions of dollars if they told CNN the truth?

 

This is absurd, of course man has been at the moon!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by RoguePhotonic

This is one thread I would not get involved in...I did on one forum once...but it leads to really REALLY bad flaming lol....I hate when people go off about oh that is stupid when they have never looked at any of the reasons why we did not go....

 

More likely they have looked at the flimsy evidence supporting the "moon hoax" claims, and just find the evidence to the contrary far more compelling. If you're willing to look at both sides, then it's clear that any claims the moon landing was faked are utterly ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

when i was just a little boy 7 years old i got to stay up late and watch on TV and I am not talking about some tv sound byte the moment in time itself. i have also heard and seen all the for and against conspiracy things. what you have to realize is that in that moment in time going to the moom and the space race was non violent game of politics for the US and Russia to play, who was in space first, there the longest etc. they never found resourses on the moon that was one of the reasons they went. and thank god they did not or we would have mined a whole inot the moon that would have blown the thing up, then we would be like the klingons in that star trek movie a dying race.

space is expensive and with the explossion of that last space shuttle it is going to years before they happpily send more.

i would like to think in the great hope and future of the positive outlook of Gene Rodenburry and Star Trek or George lucas of Star Wars; that we did in fact go to the moon, because all that sci -fi is not going to become sci-fact unless it did.

 

*and by the way

I voted they are Zoom's foot prints on the moon.*

:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I voted for the 'no moon' hypothesis as well. :dozey:

 

Yes, I think we went to the moon. The flag argument is a perfect example of what's wrong with the 'no-landing' theory. It was standing out straight because it had a wire stuck through the top. :rolleyes: They knew it was going to just hang, which wouldn't look good on the news, so they sewed a wire into the flag to make it stand out.

 

Also, the moon does indeed have an atmosphere...just not much of one. :D There aren't enough gas molecules present to cause the flag 'waving,' however. That is being caused by momentum, as Jedi Hunter pointed out. Since there wasn't enough air or gravity to affect the flag, the slightest movement would have traveled along that wire we just discussed and caused the whole thing to move. Remember Newton--a thing in motion remains in motion unless acted upon by an outside force. We don't see this much down here on Earth in our soupy atmosphere and thick gravity, but in space the slightest movement continues on for much longer.

 

At least I think it was Newton... :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have heard a lot of theories in the past about men not going to the moon and that it was a huge conspiracy to fool the world.

I, for one, believe that it is making it needlessly complicated. Think about Occam's Razor; it would end up being more costly and complicated to build NASA, stage fake rocket launches, build a huge soundstage, hire the most talented FX guys available at the time as well as all the ususal film-crew types,.. and THEN keep the whole lot of them silent for 30+ years. :rolleyes: yeah,.. that's going to work. Sounds a whole lot easier, doesn't it?

 

It ends up easier and cheaper to just go to the moon. Therefore, there's no reason to believe that isn't what they did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well lets put it this way...there is so much saying we didn't go to the moon I would be a fool to ever believe we did....there is allot more than what you are seeing on that site...

 

and who says everyone at nasa knows about it?...probably just a handfull do...all those people sitting at their computers are doing their job...

 

 

what do you mean though keep the people silent you hire for a film....that's no problem at all...it's called a gun :p

 

 

I think it's kinda funny though people saying we all have seent he pictures...of course it's real....yeah well I have seen the same images and those same ones make me think it's fake:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, then there's also the astronauts, and thier families, and the families of everyone involved with any supposed filming... it just works out to be an enormous number of people to keep silent.

People are a problem. They are unpredictable, often have other agendas, and if they see a way to get notarity or make a profit from a situation they will take it. That means that there should be hundreds of people popping up now to expose the "truth" but I just don't see it happening.

 

Conspiracy theories are fun,.. but they usually rely on a basis of a level of control over other people that is just unrealistic.

 

Besides,.. where did all this satellite technology we now use every day come from if we haven't gone into space? Or is it that we have gone into space but just not to the moon? And if we can get into orbit (and as far as the outer planets with various unmanned craft if you believe that) then what stopped us from getting to the moon?

 

And lastly: What is the government's motivation for lying to us all this time about going to the moon? Why such an elaborate hoax? What would it benefit them to do it? Going to the moon gave the already most powerful country in the world a small, and largely temporary, boost of prestige and little else. No other lasting benefit that I can see. So why go through all of it and have to build up a beaurocracy to keep up an impossibly complicated charade for decades?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...