Amidala from Chop Shop Posted May 17, 2004 Share Posted May 17, 2004 Originally posted by Dolmkazaahr Why would anyone bother about how many post's they have done??????????? 'Ohhhhh, i want a big glow thingy round my name', that's just plain childish!!!!! The purpose of Lucasforums is to get or pass on information or start a discussion about something, not to get as many posts as you can and get a stupid glow round your name!!!1 Originally posted by Majin Revan Hmm...99 posts...now...one-hundred... Originally posted by Majin Revan I'll remember that Amidala and KOTORMRJAY. But what happens if you edit something, and put something more important, but people don't read it because they have already read the post, and they miss the new info? Then you put EDIT: or make it bold so people will notice it. Just don't use your LARGE TYPE nonsense. Stormhammer has already warned you about that Originally posted by Majin Revan Actually, Amidala, the blasters are the primary fire (side blasters). The alternate fire is the laser cannon (the one I made green, chin blasters). Also, you sorta said it backwards. People would run from the green lasers, not the red blaster fire, since alternate fire is more powerful, and green is set as the alternate fire. I didn't say it backwards, you made it backwards. It's only logical that the main armament would be the primary fire and the lesser-used secondary armament would be the secondary fire. Nice try Originally posted by Majin Revan Also, Amidala, are you saying that I should leave the toughness at default, but put the armor up high? Originally posted by Amidala from Chop Shop If it were up to me, if you are striving for authenticity (and why wouldn't you unless it throws game balance way off), I would have no shields but lots of armor. I would leave toughness at default. I would only change that value if they vehicle was made of some very exotic material (like cortosis). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PR-0927 Posted May 17, 2004 Share Posted May 17, 2004 LOL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KOTORMRJay Posted May 18, 2004 Share Posted May 18, 2004 I think as a comunity at moment we should stop trying to make changes to Duncas begged for alpha model,and be appricative of what he has done ,I am sure he is compleatly capable of altering the npc and veh files for him self ,and I beleive that he wants to do it himself as well ,so lets just leave it at great job duncan ,holler if you need help and we await the final release. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PR-0927 Posted May 18, 2004 Share Posted May 18, 2004 Actually, I sent him my remake of the AT-AT a few days ago. I await his response. Of course, I still haven't put sound files for the AT-AT stepping sound, not the spawning sound. And I think Duncan_10158 was going to add something else, I just can't remember what. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kurgan Posted May 20, 2004 Share Posted May 20, 2004 Thanks to the EU and the games, we get to see the weapons that these vehicles "always had" but for some reason (in the movies) never used. Funny how that works... ; ) Hey, it's cool to hear from Geeks (and I use that in the non-prejorative sense) debating about SW canon info, but I am wondering... Do we even know that "Lasers" and "Blasters" are not just synonyms in the Star Wars universe? I always assumed (and I know there are some Geeks who disagree and debate this hotly even today, but let's set that aside for a moment) that "Blasters","Lasers", "Turbo Lasers" etc were actually all based on the same technology and in fact (if there is any difference) it is only a matter of degree. Ie: scale up the tech to make it do more damage. The "colors" are no help (other than differentiating, sometimes the good guys from the bad guys). After all, we've seen in the movies vehicles and hand held weapons firing red, green and blue shots. We've seen vehicles fire red shots, as well as green & blue "death star" (though smaller) type beams. And finally we've seen ships (both planetary and space) firing green, red and purple shots. And of course in the JK series we now have guns that fire yellow shots as well. So what's the big deal? PS: According to every scientific or pseudo scientific analysis I've read of Star Wars "technology" it's always been assumed that the term "laser" as used in Star Wars is just slang and non-literal. Real life "lasers" don't behave at all like the light bolts we see in the movies. Lasers are not normally visible, move at the speed of light, etc. PPS: I hope everybody got the multi-posting, flaming and melodrama out of their systems finally. Whoa, glad I missed all that... ; p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pnut_Man Posted May 20, 2004 Share Posted May 20, 2004 Originally posted by Kurgan Thanks to the EU and the games, we get to see the weapons that these vehicles "always had" but for some reason (in the movies) never used. Funny how that works... ; ) Hey, it's cool to hear from Geeks (and I use that in the non-prejorative sense) debating about SW canon info, but I am wondering... Do we even know that "Lasers" and "Blasters" are not just synonyms in the Star Wars universe? I always assumed (and I know there are some Geeks who disagree and debate this hotly even today, but let's set that aside for a moment) that "Blasters","Lasers", "Turbo Lasers" etc were actually all based on the same technology and in fact (if there is any difference) it is only a matter of degree. Ie: scale up the tech to make it do more damage. The "colors" are no help (other than differentiating, sometimes the good guys from the bad guys). After all, we've seen in the movies vehicles and hand held weapons firing red, green and blue shots. We've seen vehicles fire red shots, as well as green & blue "death star" (though smaller) type beams. And finally we've seen ships (both planetary and space) firing green, red and purple shots. And of course in the JK series we now have guns that fire yellow shots as well. So what's the big deal? PS: According to every scientific or pseudo scientific analysis I've read of Star Wars "technology" it's always been assumed that the term "laser" as used in Star Wars is just slang and non-literal. Real life "lasers" don't behave at all like the light bolts we see in the movies. Lasers are not normally visible, move at the speed of light, etc. PPS: I hope everybody got the multi-posting, flaming and melodrama out of their systems finally. Whoa, glad I missed all that... ; p Kurgan, You do know that what you have just said would have swarms of theforce.net forumers tracking you down in RL? Better hope there are no 'Literature' spies around here Hmm, on the subject of the AT-AT. I tried out the beta thing... It was alright--First off, I was impressed that the animations were half-decent for the thing, and I enjoyed the laser cannons. I say...release it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hgwall44 Posted May 20, 2004 Share Posted May 20, 2004 OK lets think back to these shields deal. Now say you have a big large thing like an atat. YOUR GOING along and you notice hey i cant turn on a dime and a ship shoots you up the butt hole. Now think if you didn't have a shield this big ol flying ship with its rockets are going to blow you to pieces. So the non shield atat gets shot up the butt and EVERYONE DIES in there because of no shield. Then another atat comes along and it has shield, it gets shot on the top where the back is lol. WEll the shield just absorbs it for so long of course, which makes it great. No dieing in 5 seconds. The shield should be kept, and last only so long since this is A BIG DEAL We talken about here. *shuts large notebook on history of ATAT's" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK-8252 Posted May 20, 2004 Share Posted May 20, 2004 That's why you give the AT-AT a lot of armor. AT-ATs didn't have shields, and they were unharmed by anything but the most powerful turbolaser weaponry. Don't worry, it doesn't need shields and it won't have shields. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dolmkazaahr Posted May 20, 2004 Share Posted May 20, 2004 I totally agree with tk-8252 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neon Posted May 21, 2004 Share Posted May 21, 2004 Me 2, it has to stay with the movies, not like " That's cooler , and better" , It has to stay with the movies, it's still star wars, and I'll hope that this vehicle will come to his 1.0 version Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tFighterPilot Posted May 21, 2004 Share Posted May 21, 2004 Originally posted by DogGy Me 2, it has to stay with the movies, not like " That's cooler , and better" , It has to stay with the movies, it's still star wars, and I'll hope that this vehicle will come to his 1.0 version I love you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PR-0927 Posted May 21, 2004 Share Posted May 21, 2004 LOL, don't worry, I'll fix that. The shields are taken off, and the armor is increased to 18000!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hgwall44 Posted May 22, 2004 Share Posted May 22, 2004 Sry to say it but this would be hillarious. Its you against the ATAT and you have a blaster pistol.....1hour later.....its still you with a blaster pistol and the ATAT. Man this thing is going to be great when it comes out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK-8252 Posted May 22, 2004 Share Posted May 22, 2004 Originally posted by hgwall44 Sry to say it but this would be hillarious. Its you against the ATAT and you have a blaster pistol.....1hour later.....its still you with a blaster pistol and the ATAT. Blaster pistol lasers just bounce right off. If all you have is a blaster pistol... RUN! Infact, if you're on foot at all against an AT-AT... RUN! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tFighterPilot Posted May 22, 2004 Share Posted May 22, 2004 Originally posted by TK-8252 Blaster pistol lasers just bounce right off. If all you have is a blaster pistol... RUN! Infact, if you're on foot at all against an AT-AT... RUN! Good thing I have my [shameless plug] SNOW SPEEDER [/shameless plug] with me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadCow1989 Posted May 22, 2004 Share Posted May 22, 2004 Thats the Spirit Tfighter Good old SnowSpeeders Youve done a great job on em theyr great and wil be used Good in Combat against the Big almighty ATAT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dolmkazaahr Posted May 22, 2004 Share Posted May 22, 2004 Oh, the sort of stuff we will be able to do with it... I CANT WAITTTTTTT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PR-0927 Posted May 22, 2004 Share Posted May 22, 2004 Ahhh!!!! I added new sounds for the footfalls, but, I don't know what I need to name the sounds for the footfalls. I don't know from where it is linked too!! HELP ME PLEASE!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dingo Dave Posted May 22, 2004 Share Posted May 22, 2004 don't you just go into the .veh file and set the sound fx there??? You should know that majin, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK-8252 Posted May 22, 2004 Share Posted May 22, 2004 Originally posted by Majin Revan Ahhh!!!! I added new sounds for the footfalls, but, I don't know what I need to name the sounds for the footfalls. I don't know from where it is linked too!! HELP ME PLEASE!! I already made step sounds. I'm afraid I'm a step ahead of you this time. Originally posted by Dingo Dave don't you just go into the .veh file and set the sound fx there??? You should know that majin, No, they're not in there. It's all about the animevents.cfg. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dolmkazaahr Posted May 23, 2004 Share Posted May 23, 2004 Is there any news from Renegade of Phunk???????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
True Organa Posted May 23, 2004 Share Posted May 23, 2004 i know this might b a bit late but Majin can u send me ur ATAT plz?? evry1 says its wikid thx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
True Organa Posted May 23, 2004 Share Posted May 23, 2004 opps..... my email is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
True Organa Posted May 23, 2004 Share Posted May 23, 2004 sammy.baldock@ntlworld.com # (sry bout triple post) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thrawn42689 Posted May 23, 2004 Share Posted May 23, 2004 Wait, we can get the AT-AT by simply posting our email address? Cool. thrawn42689<at>msn.com Darn those spam bots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.