ET Warrior Posted September 15, 2005 Posted September 15, 2005 that guy scares me no quarterback has started out like he has It's not like his wins last season were an aspect of him being a phenomenal quarterback. Not to say he's not good, guys got talents. But the Steelers didn't make it as far as they did last season on his arm, and he crumpled in the playoffs. I canNOT believe the broncos lost to the DOLPHINS. It was painful to watch that game. We need a new coach and a new quarterback, or we'll be stuck in mediocrity for freakin ever.
RevanA4 Posted September 15, 2005 Author Posted September 15, 2005 It's not like his wins last season were an aspect of him being a phenomenal quarterback. Not to say he's not good, guys got talents. But the Steelers didn't make it as far as they did last season on his arm, and he crumpled in the playoffs. I canNOT believe the broncos lost to the DOLPHINS. It was painful to watch that game. We need a new coach and a new quarterback, or we'll be stuck in mediocrity for freakin ever. I can they have the vikings ex offesive corrdinator I just can't believe that my cowboys won cuz I wasn't counting on them winning their first game
REDJOHNNYMIKE Posted September 15, 2005 Posted September 15, 2005 "that guy scares me " He does look like he's been in the league for about ten years, maybe he failed math class like 8 times and had extra time to work on his game?
stingerhs Posted September 15, 2005 Posted September 15, 2005 well, i'd have to say that Rothlisberger isn't the first quarterback i've seen go kaput in the playoffs: remember what happened to Peyton Manning against the Pats in the Division game?? another point that can be made is that Rothlisberger also had to face both the Pats and the Jets defenses in the playoffs. and either way you look at it: starting your rookie QB in the Conference Championship is definately a good way to get him some experience for the next season.
ET Warrior Posted September 15, 2005 Posted September 15, 2005 I can they have the vikings ex offesive corrdinator The dolphins didn't win off of any particular offensive prowess, they won because the broncos looked TERRIBLE. We handed them that game, plus we lost our 3 top cornerbacks early, and we're not that deep in the backfield.
RevanA4 Posted September 15, 2005 Author Posted September 15, 2005 The dolphins didn't win off of any particular offensive prowess, they won because the broncos looked TERRIBLE. We handed them that game, plus we lost our 3 top cornerbacks early, and we're not that deep in the backfield. meh my cowboys won on 3 key third down penalties by the chargers that resulted in 3 touchdowns oh and the 2 interceptions helped as well
Jeff Posted September 15, 2005 Posted September 15, 2005 meh my cowboys won on 3 key third down penalties by the chargers that resulted in 3 touchdowns oh and the 2 interceptions helped as well Speaking of penalties... The Packers had at least 15 penalties in the game. It was pretty embarassing (if I was a packers fan that is). That definately helped the Lions.
Snafu7 Posted September 15, 2005 Posted September 15, 2005 Speaking of penalties... The Packers had at least 15 penalties in the game. It was pretty embarassing (if I was a packers fan that is). That definately helped the Lions. Yeah, if they would've cut down on the penalties, we would've had a much better chance. But it also says something about the Lions offence, about half of the yards they gained were on penalties.
Jeff Posted September 15, 2005 Posted September 15, 2005 Yeah, if they would've cut down on the penalties, we would've had a much better chance. But it also says something about the Lions offence, about half of the yards they gained were on penalties.I'm pretty sure penalty yards don't go into their stats, but yes, if it wasn't for the penalties, they very well could have lost. I'm wondering if they will be able to score more than 20 points this week against the Bears. Their D is pretty tough, but their offense sucks... I think right now the Lions problem is coaching. From Marriuci's way to conservative style to all the draw plays and other crummy play calling (they did a draw play on third and ten, and as usual got stuffed at the line). If they would just throw downfield more...
Snafu7 Posted September 15, 2005 Posted September 15, 2005 I'm pretty sure penalty yards don't go into their stats I think they do, because I think I heard one of the commentators talking about it during the 4th quarter
Jeff Posted September 15, 2005 Posted September 15, 2005 Trust me on this one, they don't. You guys had like 5 pass interference calls, and Joey still only had like 150 yards passing. And I know the interfernce calls dont count for completions.
Snafu7 Posted September 15, 2005 Posted September 15, 2005 oh well, doesn't matter, It still made a huge difference in the game.
RevanA4 Posted September 18, 2005 Author Posted September 18, 2005 COWBOYS AND THE REDSKINS ON MONDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL and on top of that they are adding names in to the ring of honor clicky clicky
REDJOHNNYMIKE Posted September 19, 2005 Posted September 19, 2005 Cleveland and CINCI won on the same day!!!!! PIGS ARE FLYING AND OCCULT MEMBERS ARE FIGHTING MILITIA MEMBERS IN THE STREET FOR CONTROL OF THE FALLING KRYPTONITE COMETS!!!!!
ET Warrior Posted September 19, 2005 Posted September 19, 2005 Big win for the Broncos today over Sand Diego! Woo! If the offense can pull their heads out of their asses next week and we can beat the cheifs Broncos will be atop the AFC West. Booyah.
RevanA4 Posted September 19, 2005 Author Posted September 19, 2005 well 3 out of the 4 nfc east teams play tomarrow so If the cowboys beat the redskins and the giants loss they are on top of the nfc east
Jeff Posted September 19, 2005 Posted September 19, 2005 Cleveland and CINCI won on the same day!!!!! PIGS ARE FLYING AND OCCULT MEMBERS ARE FIGHTING MILITIA MEMBERS IN THE STREET FOR CONTROL OF THE FALLING KRYPTONITE COMETS!!!!! Wait... You like the Browns and the Bengals? I thought it was some kind of unwritten rule to hate one or the other in-state rivals... Well, I am very very happy that the Bengals won (Carson Palmer for teh win!), but I'm quite disappointed in my Lions. Blown out by the lowly bears! Oh well...
Bob Lion54 Posted September 20, 2005 Posted September 20, 2005 Well,the NEW ORLEANS SAINTS just lost 27-10 to the NEW YORK GIANTS. Theres always next week.......
RevanA4 Posted November 23, 2005 Author Posted November 23, 2005 this years suprises plesant suprises for those teams cowboys bears unplesant vikings packers eagles
Jeff Posted November 23, 2005 Posted November 23, 2005 Well the Lions stink, but I am very happy with the Bengals. I was mad they didn't beat the colts, but they will win most games scoring 35 points. And I like the Colts too, so I didn't mind them winning that much. I want one of those 2 teams to make it to the Super Bowl for the AFC.
Snafu7 Posted November 23, 2005 Posted November 23, 2005 uhhg the packers are 2-8, how the hell did this happen... Anyways, I'm definately gonna pick the Colts to go to the Super Bowl for the AFC, and the falcons or possibly the bears if they really get their game to together.
stingerhs Posted November 23, 2005 Posted November 23, 2005 i don't know. the Colts are the heavy favorite to take the AFC, but i won't be convinced until they play Pittsburgh. otherwise, Denver is definatively the second best in the AFC. from the NFC, i'm all for Dallas, Carolina, or Chicago to take the NFC crown.
Jeff Posted November 23, 2005 Posted November 23, 2005 If Chicago goes to the Super Bowl then I guarantee an AFC super bowl champion.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.