The Seeker Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 Looks pretty legit, though without being able to track down a single confirmed announcement from EA, I have my doubts. Either way, it's a nice lookin vid and worth hoping for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IG-64 Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 I saw this yesterday. It'd be a pretty elaborite April Fools, especially it not being April Fools yet. The gameplay looks pretty legit. I'm gonna assume it's real and say that it looks pretty awesome and that I can't wait. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Groovy Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 Oh come on dude, you used YouTube as your source?! Anybody could have made that an uploaded it. Literally. Even so, looks legit enough, but isn't this kind of a been there, done that, sort of concept, or is it just me? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manoman81 Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 I agree. Although, if this does turn out to be real, I'd pick it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samuel Dravis Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 Alleged? Nah. It looks ok. If someone can read this DICE says something about it too. Here's another video clip. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dagobahn Eagle Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 I already heard about this. To the Hot Place with E.A.! Why can't they for once finish an existing project before moving on to the next one?! Finish the patching of BF 2, add some more stuff to it, and then move on to another game. And sure, of course the Earth will be half-covered by ice in a hundred years. One needs only look at the rising temperature, melting poles, and greenhouse effect to realize that:rolleyes:. Gawd... Just... Gawd... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BongoBob Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 Well in the near future they fix that problem, but it works too well, thus the problem with ice Tell us how you really feel about EA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IG-64 Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 I already heard about this. To the Hot Place with E.A.! Why can't they for once finish an existing project before moving on to the next one?! Finish the patching of BF 2, add some more stuff to it, and then move on to another game. And sure, of course the Earth will be half-covered by ice in a hundred years. One needs only look at the rising temperature, melting poles, and greenhouse effect to realize that:rolleyes:. Gawd... Just... Gawd... Could that be why "no one expected the ice"? Besides, couldn't global warming actually make things colder? It's possible it could shut down thermohaline circulation and make (at least some) places colder. And besides, it's fiction so who gives a crap and a half anyways. And if you read the article SD just posted you'll see that BF2142 is being developed "in DICE Stockholm while the DICE Canada studio will be hard at work on a 1.3 update for Battlefield 2" So uh, Gawd yourself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sabretooth Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 Tell us how you really feel about EA Oh believe me, if they start a thread on that, it'll be locked up way before Earth gets covered with ice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Seeker Posted March 22, 2006 Author Share Posted March 22, 2006 Oh come on dude, you used YouTube as your source?! Anybody could have made that an uploaded it. Literally. Yes, I realize that. Which is why I said "Looks pretty legit, though without being able to track down a single confirmed announcement from EA, I have my doubts." Plus, I just ripped the link from here where I first spotted it http://cad-comic.com/news.php?i=1053 But thanks to good ol Samuel Dravis, we do have a confirmed announcement from EA. Still up for grabs of whether the vid is real or not though, since a quick glance at EAgames.com didn't reveal it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IG-64 Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 Still up for grabs of whether the vid is real or not though, since a quick glance at EAgames.com didn't reveal it. Unless someone with inside information has the ability to create a professional-quality trailer and release it a day before the official announcement, it's probably real. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoxStar Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 So this is what happens after EA takes over your development studio.... A completely new game announced 9 months, 1 expansion pack, and a booster pack the previous game's release. I weep for the future of DICE and Battlefield series ;_; and Battlefield 3142 would've been much cooler in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrWally Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 and Battlefield 3142 would've been much cooler in my opinion. Assuming we make it to 3142 =P This was the cover story for this month's PC gamer. Definately legit, and while it looks pretty cool, I am really getting sick of EA dishing out games faster than you can say "splinter cell." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lukeiamyourdad Posted March 23, 2006 Share Posted March 23, 2006 Hey, for once that they're innovating, all must bash EA. They want to dish out games? Let them. Who cares as long as they're good (not always the case with EA)? If they can make a quality BF2142 for this fall while still support BF2 then all is fine. It seems every situation is good for bashing for some people... Besides, it's DICE Stockholm, makers of the two good BF games. I don't think these guys will screw it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IG-64 Posted March 23, 2006 Share Posted March 23, 2006 and Battlefield 3142 would've been much cooler in my opinion. I think Battlefield 2942 would make more sense. >_> You know.. thousand year diffrence and stuff... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
acdcfanbill Posted March 23, 2006 Share Posted March 23, 2006 I think if i was at FASA i'd have a heart attack :s pretty similar looking mechs if u ask me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoxStar Posted March 23, 2006 Share Posted March 23, 2006 I think Battlefield 2942 would make more sense. >_> OR 3942, because then the three can signify the third entry into the franchise. Plus, with 3942 we could have space combat ^_^ Anywho, I think that Enemy Territory: Quake Wars could be a worthy challenger to this, considering how they're both futuristic, and will both feature sweet vehicles and huge battles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toms Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 or 40k42 The voiceover guy sounds like some teenager in his bedroom with a bad echo effect.. so i'm kinda surprised it turned out real. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dagobahn Eagle Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 [qquote]And besides, it's fiction so who gives a crap and a half anyways. I hate that attitude. Yes, it's fiction, but it still needs to make sense. Hey, for once that they're innovating, all must bash EA. They want to dish out games? Let them. Who cares as long as they're good (not always the case with EA)? If they can make a quality BF2142 for this fall while still support BF2 then all is fine. It seems every situation is good for bashing for some people... The problem is that not all of these games they dish out are good. And there's the problem with the modding community, too. Just as they were getting settled in with BF2, a new game gets released. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alegis Posted March 26, 2006 Share Posted March 26, 2006 Looks like a BF2 mod. Nothing more ... yet. Not impressed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lukeiamyourdad Posted March 28, 2006 Share Posted March 28, 2006 I hate that attitude. Yes, it's fiction, but it still needs to make sense. Yeah, but I don't think anyone besides crazy environmentalist would go out and say:"OMG! That doesn't make sense! We'll all be dead by then!" The problem is that not all of these games they dish out are good. Of course not, but for once that they do it right, nobody gives them a bit of credit, just because it's EA. I'm not an EA fan, I just hate bashing for the sake of it. And there's the problem with the modding community, too. Just as they were getting settled in with BF2, a new game gets released. Technically, modding is illegal, but companies don't care about it. They also don't have to care about modders. Their impact is marginal at best. So yeah, they do what they bloody want and you can't do nothing about it. They own the license, they own everything, they do whatever they want. Don't like it? Don't buy it. Boycott their products, do whatever will make you feel better. Except that nothing will be changed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samuel Dravis Posted March 28, 2006 Share Posted March 28, 2006 Technically, modding is illegal, but companies don't care about it. They also don't have to care about modders. Their impact is marginal at best.The modder's impact is marginal? Lol, I direct you to Halflife's Counterstrike. The ONLY reason many people care about HL today is because of modders. Game developers many times purposefully go out of their way to make things easy to mod, and with good reason - it's what keeps them off the shelf and playable - and generating more income - for years longer than a static game ever could. I seriously doubt that they 'don't care' about modders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lukeiamyourdad Posted March 28, 2006 Share Posted March 28, 2006 Most don't. Of course, we could take some examples of heavily modded games and say that's how everything is but I don't think so. If the effect of modding is so great, we'd see PC gaming would dominate. I don't deny how some mods managed to stand out and how some companies do make their games as mod friendly as possible but is that the majority? Do they even hit as many people as that? Does the common gamer go out and look for mods? I seriously doubt the popularity of most mods outside of specific game circles. it's what keeps them off the shelf and playable - and generating more income How exactly? Mods don't give the companies money, at least not directly. It's a very hard statistic to get. Will people go out and buy a game specifically because of the mods? Does the general public even know that it has a lot of mods? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samuel Dravis Posted March 28, 2006 Share Posted March 28, 2006 Most don't. Of course, we could take some examples of heavily modded games and say that's how everything is but I don't think so. If the effect of modding is so great, we'd see PC gaming would dominate.I didn't say it was so great as to offset the ~$1200 dollar expense of getting a gaming computer for everyone. However, it is great enough that there is benefit to the developer to make it moddable. Also, there's always the hope that your game might make it big like HL did. I don't deny how some mods managed to stand out and how some companies do make their games as mod friendly as possible but is that the majority? Do they even hit as many people as that? Does the common gamer go out and look for mods?I don't know any PC gamer that doesn't. If they didn't at one time, I corrected their mistake and they like them now, very much so. I seriously doubt the popularity of most mods outside of specific game circles. Imagine that. Some people like some mods, some like others. They're meant to be specific to an interest group; it's not like most mods are TCs. How exactly? Mods don't give the companies money, at least not directly. It's a very hard statistic to get. Will people go out and buy a game specifically because of the mods? Does the general public even know that it has a lot of mods?I personally buy games because of mods. I heard that Homeworld had an awesome SW mod, so I bought that. When HW2 came out I bought that as well, largely because of my experience with the mods available and personally modding the original (which was as fun as the game itself, I might add). You keep your customers happy you will have return business. Relic kept me quite happy, and they did get my business again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTV2 Posted March 28, 2006 Share Posted March 28, 2006 I already heard about this. To the Hot Place with E.A.! Why can't they for once finish an existing project before moving on to the next one?! Finish the patching of BF 2, add some more stuff to it, and then move on to another game. And sure, of course the Earth will be half-covered by ice in a hundred years. One needs only look at the rising temperature, melting poles, and greenhouse effect to realize that:rolleyes:. Gawd... Just... Gawd... ever see the movie, Day After Tommorrow? and theres more than just 1 team that works for all of EA. one team works on the patches for others, another team works on new games, etc, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.