Yar-El Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 Newsweek Article - Why There Won’t Be a Revolution The poor you will always have, the good book says, but as for the rich man, he will wither away like a delicate flower in the midday sun. The first prediction has certainly been borne out, but the second part (James 1:11) had not yet come to pass by the Panic of 1907, when Theodore Roosevelt warned of a coming reckoning against the "malefactors of great wealth." Nor by 1990, when former Nixon aide Kevin Phillips predicted that Americans would rise to extract revenge on "the rich who got the benefits of the go-go years" of the 1980s. As late as 2001, no less an authority than, uh, NEWSWEEK wrote in the wake of 9/11 that "the arrogant wheeler-dealer ordering a $600 bottle of wine with dinner … has vanished utterly as an icon," which remained true until approximately 2002. Well, listen up, you rich guys, this time we really mean it. The president himself is repelled by your rapacious greed, your kids are ashamed to admit that their mom is a banker, even your girlfriends are sick of your whining about your bonus, and you're going to have to learn to live on $500,000 a year like a normal person. Oh, and by the way, nice watch. Is it Cartier? I completely disagree with the reason behind why the upcoming revolution will be exclusively about class. I have seen and read enough to believe the next revolution will be about those who are corrupt and those who are patriots. Almost everyone in politics, massmedia, and in corporations are corrupt. Each is pushing for a stake in controlling how we think, walk, eat, and breath. I truely think we are going to have a revolution in the very near future; however, I don't think the massmedia is ready to be blamed for being apart of the problem. If you post in this forum it is free for everyone to reply, or I will simply lock the thread, you are of course free to only answer Americans I shall stay out of the thread, accept for moderation purposes now as of your request - j7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrrtoken Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 It depends on how a "revolution" should be interpreted. If you mean a revolution against the state by rogue organizations, i.e., guerrilla warfare, then I doubt that would happen in the US, or anywhere else in the Western world. First, no one is being persecuted to the breaking point. There are reasons why Batista, Pahlavi, and Nicolas II all faced revolution; they were complete despots. They controlled the population with fear absolute authority, which really has not happened in America. Additionally, it's an unfortunate fact that most Americans are either too lazy or ignorant to resort to protests and eventually violence against the state. Oh, and nice try disguising this thread. We all know who it's really about... (It starts with an "O" and ends with an "a") Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yar-El Posted February 8, 2009 Author Share Posted February 8, 2009 It depends on how a "revolution" should be interpreted. If you mean a revolution against the state by rogue organizations, i.e., guerrilla warfare, then I doubt that would happen in the US, or anywhere else in the Western world. First, no one is being persecuted to the breaking point. There are reasons why Batista, Pahlavi, and Nicolas II all faced revolution; they were complete despots. They controlled the population with fear absolute authority, which really has not happened in America. Additionally, it's an unfortunate fact that most Americans are either too lazy or ignorant to resort to protests and eventually violence against the state. Wrong! The American Revolution was not exclusively about persecution. We have also hit a breaking point in US history. People are extremely motivated by the corruption in politics, corporations, and massmedia. Listen to what people are saying. We have politicians scaring people with war, high taxes, and economic decline. I don't think we will resort to protests due to the realization they don't work. Action is the only other course. Oh, and nice try disguising this thread. We all know who it's really about... (It starts with an "O" and ends with an "a") Is this a new thing now? Someone has a opinion in contradiction to a selected group, and then they yell, "FOUL!" Where did you get Obama from? I'm talking about a all out revolution between the corrupt and uncorrupt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonathan7 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 Is this a new thing now? Someone has a opinion in contradiction to a selected group, and then they yell, "FOUL!" Where did you get Obama from? That's not new, its been going on since Time immemorial. There won't be a revolution due to the fact the FBI/CIA and the Army ultimately, wouldn't allow it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yar-El Posted February 8, 2009 Author Share Posted February 8, 2009 That's not new, its been going on since Time immemorial. There won't be a revolution due to the fact the FBI/CIA and the Army ultimately, wouldn't allow it. There are laws that prevent them from being involved. The Posse Comitatus Act & Insurrection Act of 1807. I think people are feeling truely enraged. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonathan7 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 There are laws that prevent them from being involved. The Posse Comitatus Act & Insurrection Act of 1807 Do you really think all these "corrupt" politicians would allow themselves to loose power over a 200 year old law. Nor do I think the dynamics are anywhere near bad enough for a revolution, America has seen much worse times off without one. Revolutions are only successful if you have control of a vital asset - the army, nor do I think people are nearly as angry over the super rich as you think... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yar-El Posted February 8, 2009 Author Share Posted February 8, 2009 Do you really think all these "corrupt" politicians would allow themselves to loose power over a 200 year old law. Nor do I think the dynamics are anywhere near bad enough for a revolution, America has seen much worse times off without one. Things have changed over the years. 53% of our fellow Americans hired someone who was not a Washington insider. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonathan7 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 Things have changed over the years. 53% of our fellow Americans hired someone who was not a Washington insider. I'm not American Things do change, but I highly doubt there will be a revolution, not least because nearly all the Americans I know are not angry enough to even want one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yar-El Posted February 8, 2009 Author Share Posted February 8, 2009 I'm not American Things do change, but I highly doubt there will be a revolution, not least because nearly all the Americans I know are not angry enough to even want one. You and I don't have anything to say to each other on this topic. Another American Revolution doesn't directly affect you; thus, there is no longer any need for you and I to debate on the subject. I will wait until an American Citizen chimes in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Avlectus Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 I'm American. I disagree with a revolution being entirely about class as the article says. I can see it being more about outrage for some reason or another. We've already begun numerous threads of why, pointing to this as a conclusion. Patriots vs corrupt intenrational weasels? OK. I can go with that. Yeah, whoever heard of an honest politician? Media...yeah it's about time they got their spanking... Likely, if the banks and economic system melt down and collapse. That is the most plausible main reason. That and someone finally succeeds in undoing our constitution. Which, there are some who wish to do that, in secrecy. --Still going to play devil's advocate here: I mean I know people generally don't mean well...but come on. World collapse? I know it's gonna suck for us here in the states if/when something boils over, that much I won't deny--but the whole world? Oh, and nice try disguising this thread. We all know who it's really about... (It starts with an "O" and ends with an "a") Down, boy! Down! Seriously why does everyone assume in the least it's all about Obama? He's just a man--furthermore I think the article in question is concentrating on an issue--not a person (even if there may be a relationship between them). >_> No more of this Obama crap, fanboys, fangirls, and critics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonathan7 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 You and I don't have anything to say to each other on this topic. Another American Revolution doesn't directly affect you; thus, there is no longer any need for you and I to debate on the subject. I will wait until an American Citizen chimes in. Of course it directly affects me, America is the worlds only super power, and her influence is felt all over the world in a million and one different ways. You don't have to respond to my posts, if somehow, my reasoning doesn't count as I'm not American. I would suggest if you want to debate this with *only* Americans, you might want to post it in a forum, where you can only enter if you are American. Last time I checked Lucas Forums was multi national, and if you happen to post in this forum, all nationals are welcome to comment on any subject. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Avlectus Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 Of course it directly affects me, America is the worlds only super power, and her influence is felt all over the world in a million and one different ways. I have my doubts--but if you care to disprove me, I will indulge you. You don't have to respond to my posts, if somehow, my reasoning doesn't count as I'm not American. I would suggest if you want to debate this with *only* Americans, you might want to post it in a forum, where you can only enter if you are American. Last time I checked Lucas Forums was multi national, and if you happen to post in this forum, all nationals are welcome to comment on any subject. MMh.. I'd say Americans are beginning to get a bit restless. Like you said: Maybe not near angry enough yet. Still, I wouldn't ignore it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yar-El Posted February 8, 2009 Author Share Posted February 8, 2009 I have my doubts--but if you care to disprove me, I will indulge you. MMh.. I'd say Americans are beginning to get a bit restless. Like you said: Maybe not near angry enough yet. Still, I wouldn't ignore it. I'm also betting on the military support for the people. Our military is growing restless as well; thus, I think they will support a fight to protect constitutional law. America doesn't seem to be living in a world of everything is normal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Det. Bart Lasiter Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 You and I don't have anything to say to each other on this topic. Another American Revolution doesn't directly affect you; thus, there is no longer any need for you and I to debate on the subject. I will wait until an American Citizen chimes in. I'm an American citizen and j7 was right and you are pretty silly to say that a second American revolution wouldn't affect anyone else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonathan7 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 I have my doubts--but if you care to disprove me, I will indulge you. America has the biggest military in the world; we have a duel presence in both Iraq and Afghanistan, should there be a revolution, the Army could well be put into disarary. And as such, that effects our troop, and has an effect on Britain. Ergo; I'm affected. Should there be a revolution, the already fragile Financial markets would be hit by further freefall; ergo I'm affected. America is the worlds biggest donate of aid; if there is a revolution that could change, ergo any country needed aid is affected. On a personal level; I have American family - if there is a revolution that would cause me to be worried and affected. Do you really want me to go on? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astor Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 I don't see a Revolution happening in this day and age, to be honest, especially in the US. If revolution were as imminent as is claimed, surely we all (and I include people of all nationalities in this) would have seen something of this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yar-El Posted February 8, 2009 Author Share Posted February 8, 2009 I'm an American citizen and j7 was right and you are pretty silly to say that a second American revolution wouldn't affect anyone else. You are right in your analysis. An American Revolution would affect the world; however, it would not feel its affects in a direct way. Sure, we can argue how the lack of world assistance may causes unrest; nevertheless, no one in another country will feel the brunt force of an all out revolution. Not immediately anyway. Comments about if people are on an ignore list or not are considered against Kavars rules. Though you cannot put me on your ignore list due to the fact I'm a moderator - j7 I also can't keep you out of my posts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrrtoken Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 You and I don't have anything to say to each other on this topic. Another American Revolution doesn't directly affect you; thus, there is no longer any need for you and I to debate on the subject. I will wait until an American Citizen chimes in. Think of it this way: A revolution in a country like Micronesia would be like throwing a pebble in a lake; small ripples spread throughout the water. A revolution in a superpower such as America would be like a kilometer-wide meteor hurtling at the lake at several thousand kilometers-an-hour, instantly throwing water up into the air, instantly vaporizing it, while creating a massive impact crater. An armed revolution in any western nation would ultimately dramatically effect the world, leaving the global economy in shambles, enticing other more enthusiastic nations to potentially gobble up adjacent territory, and possibly triggering a world-wide conflict, which might turn nuclear. This domino effect has been seen in the past, especially form the Great Depression, and how that effected essentially all of Europe. Of course, that was in 1929, when the world was still rather isolated. Today, the entire world is interconnected through many different factors, essentially impossible to reverse. You are right in your analysis. An American Revolution would affect the world; however, it would not feel its affects in a direct way. Sure, we can argue how the lack of world assistance may causes unrest; nevertheless, no one in another country will feel the brunt force of an all out revolution. Not immediately anyway.No, it would immediately effect the world. Not only is isolation virtually impossible today, we also have instant access to knowledge and information via the Internets. Any news of a revolution would get out quickly, causing economists and investors to scramble and panic, probably triggering a crash in the stock market, as in 1929. Either way, the world will be affected almost immediately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mur'phon Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 J7 is un-ignorable, partly due to being a nice wordsmith, partly due to being a mod. Not feel the effects imediately? My countries are Russia and Norway, and an American revolution might well lead to a rather imediate occupation of the latter by the former, which would affect me in a majorly bad way (would make paperwork a breeze though:xp:). Anyway, I can't see a revolution due to corruption, sure, America does have corruption, but it is nothing in a global sense. Besides, a country with fairly functual governmental institutions, a fairly well off population and little oppression gives the people little reason to want a revolution, as well as making one nigh on impossible to pull off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yar-El Posted February 8, 2009 Author Share Posted February 8, 2009 Think of it this way: A revolution in a country like Micronesia would be like throwing a pebble in a lake; small ripples spread throughout the water. A revolution in a superpower such as America would be like a kilometer-wide meteor hurtling at the lake at several thousand kilometers-an-hour, instantly throwing water up into the air, instantly vaporizing it, while creating a massive impact crater. An armed revolution in any western nation would ultimately dramatically effect the world, leaving the global economy in shambles, enticing other more enthusiastic nations to potentially gobble up adjacent territory, and possibly triggering a world-wide conflict, which might turn nuclear. This domino effect has been seen in the past, especially form the Great Depression, and how that effected essentially all of Europe. Of course, that was in 1929, when the world was still rather isolated. Today, the entire world is interconnected through many different factors, essentially impossible to reverse. Has the United States really become an empire? Do other people think this way? How can a Revolutionary War in the US be globally effective? I didn't think we had a global impact in such a scale. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arcesious Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 I'm an American, and I think people are overreacting. It isn't that bad. The problem with America is that it is too divided. Remember George Washinton's Farewell Address? He was spot on about pretty much everything, especially his warnings about Political Parties and Government spending. America is, as Kreia would say: [...] a stagnant beast that labors for breath... I also quote: Divided we fail. The problem is only partially connected to the wealthy people of the country, it is composed of tons of problems and issues that hold it back and starve it from its potential. I dont think there'll be any revolution. People are just going to keep whining and complaining, but it won't do anything. The country will keep going, slowly and painfully, deteriorating and bulding itself back up, until someone steps up and really gets things moving. Still, it could be worse. But it's not going to get much worse. It's just going to keep going and going and going, having its ups and downs as usual... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrrtoken Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 Has the United States really become an empire?Uh..... yeah. Ever heard of something called the Cold War? Do other people think this way?I'm sure not willingly, but denying the superpower status of the US would be quite ignorant. How can a Revolutionary War in the US be globally effective?The global economy, especially the oil industry, would be dramatized with having their number one buyer thrown into anarchy. I didn't think we had a global impact in such a scale.Ever heard of the Great Depression? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Det. Bart Lasiter Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 Has the United States really become an empire? Do other people think this way? How can a Revolutionary War in the US be globally effective? I didn't think we had a global impact in such a scale.hmm yase i dont know anything about this issue perhaps i shall comment upon it regardless Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yar-El Posted February 8, 2009 Author Share Posted February 8, 2009 You don't think people are boiling over? I keep hearing about another Revolution. I normally ignore people who say such things; however, you can't ignore the radio, tv, and internet these days. Something is boiling beneath the surface. You can feel it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Avlectus Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 America has the biggest military in the world; we have a duel presence in both Iraq and Afghanistan, should there be a revolution, the Army could well be put into disarary. And as such, that effects our troop, and has an effect on Britain. Ergo; I'm affected. Taken. Should there be a revolution, the already fragile Financial markets would be hit by further freefall; ergo I'm affected. Okay. I can see where you're coming from on an individual level...but on a larger level...I still have doubts. You mean to tell me other wealthy nations (namely those in europe) would be unable to stand on their own sufficiently if something happened to the US? I know the financial situations are volatile--but I have a hard time believing it would become financially so dire if things went to hell in USA. You really mean to tell me if the financial sector broke here, that places like yours would experience a crisis like a depression? --However I do share your sentiment that if the goniffs high on the food chain do something to rock the boat like take all the money and run --for office or their hideout-- then they ought to be dealt with. How 'dealt with' is another subject not entirely relevant--you get my point here I think. America is the worlds biggest donate of aid; if there is a revolution that could change, ergo any country needed aid is affected. Wasn't sure. Actually thank you, that's good to hear--the nauseating America bashers in this country who live here would have you believe otherwise. Seriously. --That is good news. Thanks. However: Greed here is still higher than I ever remember it in my life. On all levels. On a personal level; I have American family - if there is a revolution that would cause me to be worried and affected. OK. Good a reason as any. Gives me a little more reason to look out for my neighbors. Do you really want me to go on? I think I see your points... more or less. Save for the above, bank wise (take as far as need be), No, you don't really have to--sounds like it pains you somewhat. I don't see a Revolution happening in this day and age, to be honest, especially in the US. If revolution were as imminent as is claimed, surely we all (and I include people of all nationalities in this) would have seen something of this? Sort of what I'm saying. There is more unrest, though. Probably insignificant on a relative scale. The greed is going up, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.