Sivy Posted November 4, 2002 Share Posted November 4, 2002 I read in the news today that Sean Connery filmed a small cameo for die another day, where he played james bond’s father. They then realised that in Ian flemming’s books james bond was an orphan so they decided to cut the scene out. Would you have like them to have left it in or were they right to take it out? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gorganfloss Posted November 4, 2002 Share Posted November 4, 2002 hmmmm I think that if they left it in they would have destroyed the fabric of time and space. So Ill vote they were right to cut it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CagedCrado Posted November 4, 2002 Share Posted November 4, 2002 i would have liked it to stay, but not as his father. Maybe some other cameo roll, but not his father. Thats just dumb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professor Snape Posted November 5, 2002 Share Posted November 5, 2002 half the ppl who see the james bond movies don't read the books so they should keep it in. Or if not as teh father, Connery would make a great villian. Mayb make him the villian in the next bond movie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taos Posted November 5, 2002 Share Posted November 5, 2002 They should have it in the movie.......Connery was the best bond ever! It would have been cool to see. Kinda like how Richard Roundtree was in the Shaft movie with Samuel L. Jackson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acrylic Posted November 5, 2002 Share Posted November 5, 2002 Yea, I think they shoulda cutted it out cuz yea, it wouldnt make any sense. (Maybe on the DVD they could put it on an extra scene or special feature or something?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JediNyt Posted November 5, 2002 Share Posted November 5, 2002 It was right to cut since Bond is an orphan. But it would be neat to see Connery in a cameo as another person. Ya I like the idea as a villan in the next Bond. IMO Brosnsn is the best Bond! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chewbacco Posted November 5, 2002 Share Posted November 5, 2002 They were right to cut it out. It would've messed up the James Bond Timeline. Scew it all up. Fans will get confused. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
acdcfanbill Posted November 5, 2002 Share Posted November 5, 2002 Well, in Goldeneye I believe it refers to both Bond and Trevlen being Orphaned... so even if you dont count the books, it still goes against the movies Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Simpson Posted November 5, 2002 Share Posted November 5, 2002 Suck it Trebek! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boba Rhett Posted November 5, 2002 Share Posted November 5, 2002 *snip* *snip* Bye bye clip from movie! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JediNyt Posted November 5, 2002 Share Posted November 5, 2002 Originally posted by Darth Simpson Suck it Trebek! Ill take The Rapist for 400! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jedi_Monk Posted November 5, 2002 Share Posted November 5, 2002 I say if you're gonna make a movie out of a book, stick with the book... and if you're gonna make a book based on a movie, stick with the movie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matt-- Posted November 5, 2002 Share Posted November 5, 2002 Yes. In Goldeneye, Trevelyan(sp?) mentions that Bond's parents died in a climbing accident. So they were right to clip it out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professor Snape Posted November 5, 2002 Share Posted November 5, 2002 Originally posted by JediNyt Ill take The Rapist for 400! I'll take Anal Bum Cover for 800 And connery was the best bond! GoldenEye was the Best bond movie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JandoFett1842 Posted November 5, 2002 Share Posted November 5, 2002 i think that is a dumb thing ps: do you know that connery hated playing bond? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sivy Posted November 5, 2002 Author Share Posted November 5, 2002 Originally posted by JandoFett1842 i think that is a dumb thing ps: do you know that connery hated playing bond? he didn't hate it, he just didn't want to be labelled 'james bond' all his life and he thought if he kept doing bonds films it would ruin his chances of getting other roles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leXX Posted November 5, 2002 Share Posted November 5, 2002 I'm SO glad they cut that out! Phew, that was close. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eldritch Posted November 6, 2002 Share Posted November 6, 2002 Originally posted by Darth Kast I'll take Anal Bum Cover for 800 And connery was the best bond! GoldenEye was the Best bond movie "I've got to ask you... about The Penis Mightier." "No, no, Mr. Connery, that's 'The Pen Is Mightier.'" "Gussy it up however you want, Trebek. All that matters is - does it work? I've spent money on this kind of thing before... a pretty penny, I don't mind telling. And if the Penis Mightier really works, I'll buy a dozen!" That's one of the best SNL skits of all time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professor Snape Posted November 6, 2002 Share Posted November 6, 2002 y wouldn't connery wanna be called james bond for the rest of his life. That would be awesome. I mean bond gets women, guns, cars, and a rockin good time doing missions for mI6 lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.