Jump to content

Home

Why in the heck are they using the Galactic Civil War?


boranchistanger

What War Would you Prefer in this Upcoming Game?  

53 members have voted

  1. 1. What War Would you Prefer in this Upcoming Game?

    • Galactic Civil War
      44
    • Clone War
      7
    • Neither
      2


Recommended Posts

Who commanded them doesn't really matter since you will be the one commanding your troops. It is irrelevant.

 

However true that the Clones=Stormtroopers(or maybe clones + recruits), in this case, both sides are made of mindless troops. On the other hand, you have the Rebels who have feelings and are alive and even the Imperials who show a degree of personality. They have officers and stormtroopers who seem capable of free thinking.

 

Nevertheless, the Clone Wars was a greyish war. No one was the good guy, no one was the bad guy. Sure one could say it's the Clones but since they've been tricked by Sidious, we're not so sure.

On the other hand, you have the Galactic Civil War, a war where both sides are clearly defined, one is good, one is bad.

 

To take a real life exemple, I'll give you the WWII games and the Vietnam War games. One of them became very popular, one of them hit a big wall of flops. None of the Vietnam war games have been able to get the popularity of similar WWII games, no matter how good they are.

The reason? I'll let you figure it out yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

thay all lose on some time

but ho is then the real leader...?

i think its palpatine becouse he killed the jedi council and ruled over all

*exapt for the rebel's that have a lot of luck*

and the clone emperors will keep his legasy go on living :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think another reason why they chose it is because people will be coming off of RoTS and they'll be like, "I wanna continue the battle!" it makes perfect sense. Not to mention the Galactic Civil War IS the biggest war in the entire Star Wars universe. Just look at it's context. Small groups of freedom fighters joining together to fight a universally massive Empire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the other hand, you have the Rebels who have feelings and are alive and even the Imperials who show a degree of personality. They have officers and stormtroopers who seem capable of free thinking.

 

So did the Republic. The clones were very capable of free-thinking, that was why, after all, they were superior to droids.

 

On the other hand, you have the Galactic Civil War, a war where both sides are clearly defined, one is good, one is bad.

 

Clearly defined? I'd argue that the Imperials were the good guys in the Galactic Civil War. At least the Imperials brought a sense of order to the Galaxy, the Rebels just brought chaos.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by boranchistanger

So did the Republic. The clones were very capable of free-thinking, that was why, after all, they were superior to droids.

The clones had limits on their thinking abilities, they were "programmed" to take orders and not question it.

 

Originally posted by boranchistanger

Clearly defined? I'd argue that the Imperials were the good guys in the Galactic Civil War. At least the Imperials brought a sense of order to the Galaxy, the Rebels just brought chaos.

The empire was a dictatorship laid down on blood and death. Definitely not the good guys. The Rebels did not just bring chaos.

 

Anyone who thinks the imperials were the good guys is a fool and should be beaten in the crotch severely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by boranchistanger

Clearly defined? I'd argue that the Imperials were the good guys in the Galactic Civil War. At least the Imperials brought a sense of order to the Galaxy, the Rebels just brought chaos.

that would be defined as good vs evil.

 

palpatine & vader: evil

 

luke & leia: good

 

and to bring more definition: when you rule with an iron fist backed by a massive military, its actually pretty easy to bring order. after the rebel victory at endor, there was still a war to be fought, thus the so-called "chaos" that you mention.

 

don't forget that it was a civil war. if you need a reminder as to the consequences of civil war, by all means refer to the american civil war from 1860-1865. the reconstruction period immidiately after the war was definately one of the more chaotic periods in american history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm quite glad it's the galactic civil war. It's far more developed with a WHOLE lot more depth. They have ships set out already classified and everything. They even have descriptive events in the EU books that show space battles, etc in great detail.

 

Also I'm glad because I'm pretty much about to give up on the Prequels. I'll buy the last prequel and have the whole collection...I just may end up crying because it's so unfulfilling. :)

Sry, I'm a biased nut. I like the OT and I've been playing fleet battles through in my head with Star Destroyers and Mon Cals since my early childhood. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What makes you so sure they have no issues acknowledging the NJO?

 

Don't bring up the KOTOR argument. KOTOR is a universe they themselves created using what people loved about the movies and turning it into a whole new game.

 

Just the fact that there is a large amount of NJO haters or simply non-lovers( >_> ) or even simplier, people who don't know what the hell that is, can easily justify their reasons NOT to center a game around that particular (horrible)section of EU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, there NJO referrence in KOTOR. Talk to the Mandalore bounty hunter and ask about his stories. Eventually he will tell you about how he saw an asteroid come to life and then fly off into hyperspace.

 

There is more to it than that but I can't remember the details.

 

Anyway, what he saw was a Yuuzhan Vong Coralskipper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Luke a NJO game would be a great Idea I have regularly said that you don't need to focus on the movies for it to be succesful KOTOR after all is a success and it uses not a drop of things from the movies.

 

as I have always said Trusim > Purism

 

and that is the way of all things totally and utterly completly irreversible:cool:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...