jon_hill987 Posted February 10, 2005 Share Posted February 10, 2005 Originally posted by Redwing What I don't understand is, if you just flip the genders here, everyone would be acting completely horrified. Even if the guy was just as attractive as this woman is. It's true, but what the hell. anyway, It is quite hard (If not impossable) for a woman to rape a man (13 years old or not), If he really wasn't concenting, things just wouldn't happen... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sivy Posted February 10, 2005 Share Posted February 10, 2005 things that like that didn't happen in my day! ... i wish it had Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
legameboy Posted February 10, 2005 Share Posted February 10, 2005 You know, she looks exactly like my English teacher. *snigger* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Sitherino Posted February 10, 2005 Author Share Posted February 10, 2005 Originally posted by Redwing What I don't understand is, if you just flip the genders here, everyone would be acting completely horrified. Even if the guy was just as attractive as this woman is. I wouldn't, your argument so holds no water. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kipperthefrog Posted February 10, 2005 Share Posted February 10, 2005 Originally posted by InsaneSith I wouldn't, your argument so holds no water. to tell you the truth, people react more harshly to men than to pretty women. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redwing Posted February 10, 2005 Share Posted February 10, 2005 Originally posted by jon_hill987 It's true, but what the hell. anyway, It is quite hard (If not impossable) for a woman to rape a man (13 years old or not), If he really wasn't concenting, things just wouldn't happen... You can be coerced into sex and still be sexually aroused, it's just less likely. Plus, you're defining penis-to-vagina sexual intercourse (or to be reasonable, fellatio) as the only possible form/s of sex that can take place, which isn't so. Originally posted by Chase Windu It's all those stupid women's rights movement things in the past. Now women have more rights than men. And white people are the only ones who can't make fun of anybody. Equal rights my @$$. It's all complete crap if you ask me. Look at the average amount of money a woman makes a year versus the amount a man makes for the exact same job, exact same quality of work. Plus the same for black anyone versus white anyone. Originally posted by InsaneSith I wouldn't, your argument so holds no water. You're not "everyone", Sithy love. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ET Warrior Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 Originally posted by jon_hill987 anyway, It is quite hard (If not impossable) for a woman to rape a man (13 years old or not), If he really wasn't concenting, things just wouldn't happen... Phhhh, maybe you have more control of yourself than most guys I know, but most guys I know can't control themselves that well :\ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lukeiamyourdad Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 Meh it depends on who it is...in some cases, there won't be any...err...you know...the little man won't get up. x_X Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IG-64 Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 Score another for homeschooling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Sitherino Posted February 11, 2005 Author Share Posted February 11, 2005 Originally posted by kipperthefrog to tell you the truth, people react more harshly to men than to pretty women. .... and I'm arguing that how? I was addressing redwings comment made towards those who post on these forums, I corrcected him. Originally posted by Redwing You're not "everyone", Sithy love. But I'm still part of everyone... or something.... YOU LIE! Originally posted by IG-64 Score another for homeschooling. Agreed, if that happened to a homeschooled kid, it'd be weird. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyrion Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 Originally posted by ET Warrior Phhhh, maybe you have more control of yourself than most guys I know, but most guys I know can't control themselves that well :\ Yeah, my pants are more or less like a revolution in that they're always trying to rise up and rebel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redwing Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 Originally posted by InsaneSith But I'm still part of everyone... or something.... YOU LIE! Neener. *glomps* Originally posted by Chase Windu You're exactly right with the money thing but I highly doubt it's like that for a lot, if not most, jobs. 'Average' would, indeed, be 'most'. (Incidentally, I'm referring to information gathered by the federal government that I learned in Economics class, although I can't cite a study or anything. However, this isn't the Senate Chambers XD) But, if a guy slaps a female co-worker on the @$$ and is just being funny the guy gets in trouble for sexual harrassment. If a woman slapped a guys @$$ nobody would get in trouble. WTF is up with that? Also, I should go and publish a magazine aimed toward white people and call it 'Whitey'. You know, sort of an 'Ebony' magazine for white people. I'll also get slapped with a bunch of lawsuits for being racist for doing the same thing. I'm simply saying that it's seriously f*ed up out there and people have hang-ups over the most f*ed up things. I totally agree with you, although when all is said and done, things like "Ebony" or "Black Entertainment Television" only bother me in a peripheral fashion, since I understand how the situation came about. Originally posted by IG-64 Score another for homeschooling. Hardly. Most child abuse, including sexual abuse, occurs in the home, usually from close relatives or friends of the family. Teacher abuse is a relatively rare occurence, which is why this is news (plus the kink factor, which like it or not is clearly there for alot of people ). Not to be depressing, or anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Sitherino Posted February 11, 2005 Author Share Posted February 11, 2005 Originally posted by Chase Windu If a woman slapped a guys @$$ nobody would get in trouble. WTF is up with that? Actually, there are lawsuits against it. Girls get in trouble for it just as much as guys. Except girls don't do it as often as men do. Originally posted by Chase Windu Also, I should go and publish a magazine aimed toward white people and call it 'Whitey'. You know, sort of an 'Ebony' magazine for white people. I'll also get slapped with a bunch of lawsuits for being racist for doing the same thing. Last time I checked, ebony was not a racial slur. Anyone that gets hung over that is an idiot and should be beaten in the genitals with a steel pipe until blood leaks from every orifice. Originally posted by Chase Windu I'm simply saying that it's seriously f*ed up out there and people have hang-ups over the most f*ed up things. Indeed. So simmer. BET and such came out because blacks were NOT getting representation like they deserved back in the 80's and such. Blacks hardly ever played true to life black people, instead they were stuck with the stereotypical pimp or crackhead rapist role. BET came about when blacks started taking charge in showbusiness to represent themselves, and bring a lighter side to blacks. To tear down the typecasting of blacks as hoods, rapists, crackheads, pimps, or societal rejects of other fashions. Sadly BET has degenerated into nothing more than a who's who of pop culture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZBomber Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 Originally posted by InsaneSith Actually, there are lawsuits against it. Girls get in trouble for it just as much as guys. Except girls don't do it as often as men do. And when they do, guys don't mind it at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redwing Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 Originally posted by ZBomber And when they do, guys don't mind it at all. Actually stuff like that, and worse stuff, happens more than you might think, but guys report it less, because they're SUPPOSED to like it. As we see from your above post Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kipperthefrog Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 courts DO tend to think of women as delicate "flower" like creatures and women cumunicate better than men wich is why they win so much in court. most of the time wives almost always get coustode of the kids and house in divorce and the male has to pay her child support even if she makes more money then he does. lets look up the divorce statistis and see if that statement is true.Child Costody Statistics look at the shocking majority of children going to their mothers over children going to their fathers or "shared":( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lukeiamyourdad Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 I saw a documentary last Tuesday on the french CBC. It showed how the courts tend to give custody to the mother in a divorce. The real thing is some of these women are crazy, I mean really crazy. They're doing it just to get back at their ex-husbands and try to get them to lose as much money as they can by draining all of their money in court. When the father has not enough money to function anymore, the court has no choice but to give custody to the mother. These cases are not all that rare. Problem is, when the marriage ends on a rough note, the two parties can't get along. You can't expect two persons who want to rip each other's eyes off to think reasonably. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kipperthefrog Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 Prooves our case. The women have more rights than men. End. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Sitherino Posted February 11, 2005 Author Share Posted February 11, 2005 Originally posted by kipperthefrog Prooves our case. The women have more rights than men. End. Mothers pushed the kid out, it's only natural that they get the lean. Unless the mother is a psycho bitch from hell, the custody is usually given to the mother because in nature, the mother is the care giver. CAREgiver. And in most divorce cases, the fathers have very little responsiblity, or character to show that they can properly care for a child, thus the most likely person to get custody is the mother. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kipperthefrog Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 A father is a caretaker just as important. It says that 60% of youth suicides come from fatherless home Source there are other side effects to losing a Dad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Sitherino Posted February 11, 2005 Author Share Posted February 11, 2005 There are just as many studies that'll show the same for a motherless home. Plus that site is biased to fathers, hardly a trustable source of pure fact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kipperthefrog Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 Originally posted by InsaneSith There are just as many studies that'll show the same for a motherless home. mothers are important too. that is why. Originally posted by InsaneSith Plus that site is biased to fathers, hardly a trustable source of pure fact. you can say that about ANY website. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Sitherino Posted February 11, 2005 Author Share Posted February 11, 2005 Originally posted by kipperthefrog you can say that about ANY website. Not from non-biased sites that present both sides. The fact is mothers are a more logical side. They give birth, and thus are usually (not always) more aware of their child. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kipperthefrog Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 what does "giving birth" have to do with it? the dad give the sperm. without it, there would be no birth. the dad is just as important. how does "giving birth"make mothers "more logical"? wait you just proove my case for me. I was saying people thing women are more nurturing than men are. YOU beleive women are more nurturing than men are. there are women who dring and cuss and beat their kids and fathers who raise kids well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Sitherino Posted February 11, 2005 Author Share Posted February 11, 2005 Originally posted by kipperthefrog there are women who dring and cuss and beat their kids and fathers who raise kids well. Yes, I know. But if you'd read what I say, the logical stance is to lean to the mothers, labor pains are more intense than a man ejaculating. Women suffer that, so they could bring this joy into the world. The average woman would not make that pain be in vain just to **** up the kid. You know what, nevermind. This argument is pointless and nothing to do with the original topic. The point is, in nature, the mother is the care giver, the father is the provider. Now we do have mothers being providers, fathers being care givers, but mothers have a more natural instinct to be caregivers. That's how it is, don't see it, fine with me. No more argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.