Jump to content

Home

A paradox


NiKo

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

...I guess it's that the third error is that there are only two error, but when you count that as an error, there are really three error, so that can't be an error, so there are only two errors, making the "three errors" bit an error, but then there are 3 errors *head explodes*

Posted
  Quote
Originally posted by DrMcCoy

...I guess it's that the third error is that there are only two error, but when you count that as an error, there are really three error, so that can't be an error, so there are only two errors, making the "three errors" bit an error, but then there are 3 errors *head explodes*

 

finally someone got it!

 

man, I cant' believe the idiots at the kornboard got it faster than you guys =/

I was rooting for you

Posted
  Quote
Originally posted by NiKo

finally someone got it!

 

...So I was right? HA, in your face, Ray! :p

 

  Quote
Originally posted by NiKo

man, I cant' believe the idiots at the kornboard got it faster than you guys =/

 

. . .

 

...That was mean, I'm far smarter than some strange korn fans...

Posted

shouldn't it be 'Their are three erorrs with this sentence'?

because the fact that there are only two errors means the third error isn't in the sentence, but rather with the sentence.

 

anyway, enough of this thinking nonsense!

lets talk about cheese... i like cheese

Posted
  Quote
Originally posted by mangaas

there's 2 errors.

"their" and "erorrs"

 

 

Wow, what a paradox :rolleyes:

 

then why does it say it has 3 errors?

wouldnt that make 'three' a 3rd mistake?

 

dont you roll your eyes at me!

Posted

Technically, since you didn't punctuate (lack of period at the end of the sentence) the "three" no longer becomes an error, still leaving us with three errors, just that "three" isn't one of that.

Posted

yeah but he explianed to mangaas, that is a paradox if there are only 2 errors, making three an error, but as you explained, the lack of of punctuation made three not an error, leaving us back at the start where a loop begins, i.e., a paradox.

 

 

 

thats the cleverist thing i ever said, yet still it doesnt really make sense.

Posted

Not so. It is no paradox for us that "three errors" was accurate, and not one of the errors itself. It is, however, a paradox for NiKo. And an unintentional one.

 

I wonder if anyone's head has exploded yet?

 

Mine is sort of rumbling.

Posted

its not unintentional because of his title.

 

However,

 

you are infact incorrect as thge stimulation of a paradox is upward-thrusting hence the part "three"

 

NOW, if the scentence is a paradox it would bring verbal count waves thus extending the length of your post.

 

now THAT, ladies and gentlemen was a loser trying to sound clever.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...