Jump to content

Home

A paradox


NiKo

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

...I guess it's that the third error is that there are only two error, but when you count that as an error, there are really three error, so that can't be an error, so there are only two errors, making the "three errors" bit an error, but then there are 3 errors *head explodes*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by DrMcCoy

...I guess it's that the third error is that there are only two error, but when you count that as an error, there are really three error, so that can't be an error, so there are only two errors, making the "three errors" bit an error, but then there are 3 errors *head explodes*

 

finally someone got it!

 

man, I cant' believe the idiots at the kornboard got it faster than you guys =/

I was rooting for you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by NiKo

finally someone got it!

 

...So I was right? HA, in your face, Ray! :p

 

Originally posted by NiKo

man, I cant' believe the idiots at the kornboard got it faster than you guys =/

 

. . .

 

...That was mean, I'm far smarter than some strange korn fans...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

shouldn't it be 'Their are three erorrs with this sentence'?

because the fact that there are only two errors means the third error isn't in the sentence, but rather with the sentence.

 

anyway, enough of this thinking nonsense!

lets talk about cheese... i like cheese

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by mangaas

there's 2 errors.

"their" and "erorrs"

 

 

Wow, what a paradox :rolleyes:

 

then why does it say it has 3 errors?

wouldnt that make 'three' a 3rd mistake?

 

dont you roll your eyes at me!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah but he explianed to mangaas, that is a paradox if there are only 2 errors, making three an error, but as you explained, the lack of of punctuation made three not an error, leaving us back at the start where a loop begins, i.e., a paradox.

 

 

 

thats the cleverist thing i ever said, yet still it doesnt really make sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its not unintentional because of his title.

 

However,

 

you are infact incorrect as thge stimulation of a paradox is upward-thrusting hence the part "three"

 

NOW, if the scentence is a paradox it would bring verbal count waves thus extending the length of your post.

 

now THAT, ladies and gentlemen was a loser trying to sound clever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...