Jump to content

Home

Halo...3?


RoxStar

Recommended Posts

Halo 2 was fun. Never beat it. I plan on buying it when it's $20 or so like I did the first one. They're good games, I just don't get the hype. Just another FPS to me.

Yeah that's pretty much how I feel about it. I play Halo 2 sometimes when I go to friends places, but it's not as fun as the N64 days with GoldenEye and Perfect Dark for some reason, probably easily explained by the "it's been done" thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply
They're good games, I just don't get the hype. Just another FPS to me.

 

I concurr, tho i guess its arguably the best fps on consoles at the moment

 

 

I'd want the ability for PC and xbox people to play on same servers. But that won't happen.

 

lol, serious pc ownage; as if any xbox players have a chance against a decent pc player. (Bare in fact that this isnt bagging out xbox players, just that a mouse would give a huge advantage)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol, serious pc ownage; as if any xbox players have a chance against a decent pc player. (Bare in fact that this isnt bagging out xbox players, just that a mouse would give a huge advantage)

Except some people can kick major ass with an analog stick just as much as people can kick ass with a mouse. Some people have the natural ability to use that stick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah that's pretty much how I feel about it. I play Halo 2 sometimes when I go to friends places, but it's not as fun as the N64 days with GoldenEye and Perfect Dark for some reason, probably easily explained by the "it's been done" thing.

I think because Goldeneye was the first time most of us played an FPS deathmatch all together in one room.

 

Halos is a decent, really polished FPS, but it does have some flaws

 

As a sidenote, most of the stuff people love about Halo 1 and 2, Goldeneye had it. Great console FPS, dual-wielding, drivable veichles....

 

Also, am I the only one who thinks that adding tracking to the rocket launcher in Halo 2 was a really bad idea? It used to be a thing of skill when you saw a ghost coming right at you and you managed to destroy it with a rocket before it killed you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

serious about the analog stick thing?

 

i thought it was merely a matter of sensitivity.. u can play with a mouse with a lot higher sensitivity than a control stick. Just imagine using a sniper rifle and there is someone behind u. Turnin around and shooting is a lot quicker with a mouse.

 

Granted some ppl will always prefer one over the other but on average i thought a mouse was an advantage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel it's smoother for me to aim with an analog stick. But I have the sensitivity at 3, which is good. I get too jerky with the mouse. But, once I'm playing, I really don't notice. I suppose I like the controllers because it's all right there for you, and I always hit the wrong keys in a panic situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Except some people can kick major ass with an analog stick just as much as people can kick ass with a mouse. Some people have the natural ability to use that stick.

 

 

For example, I been playing JA since it was called Dark Forces II. When I play JA on the xbox, I seem to be ten times more agile, and do things that I could never do with the mouse and keyboard. IE: I seem to be ten times better playing JA on XBOX live, than on the PC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

(Except the single player story, whihc is pants).

 

Gotta disagree there. The actual story wasn't even that great; decent for a FPS but nothing mind blowing. The concept of the Halo Ring was cool and the relationship between the Chief and Cortana was great. Their banter reminded me of the mission briefings before missions in the original Dark Forces. I always loved the relationship Kyle and Jan shared. Chief and Cortana had a very similar relationship, only Cortana is an AI which made it even more interesting. Other than that, nothing really stands out in my mind. The fact the story makes you repeat half of the levels (in a different way, whether going backwards or if the locale was blown to bits) was pretty cheap too.

 

Have you read the novels? I only read 'Fall of Reach' and it was excellent. Only after reading that could I fully appreciate the heroes of the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For example, I been playing JA since it was called Dark Forces II. When I play JA on the xbox, I seem to be ten times more agile, and do things that I could never do with the mouse and keyboard. IE: I seem to be ten times better playing JA on XBOX live, than on the PC.

 

It's different though, since you're using a lightsaber so movement is more important than accuracy. In shooters where you're using fairly accurate weapons, there's nothing better than a mouse and a keyboard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's personal opinion, and varies person to person. I have played Halo on Xbox and PC. I was moderately bad at Halo PC, whereas Groovy can ascertain that I'm more than decent at Halo on Xbox.

 

It's easy to be very accurate with a pair of analog sticks, you just have to be used to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't matter which platform it was designed on, the mechanics of it are exactly the same shooter to shooter. If it's implemented well on the Xbox it is simple to be VERY precise with analog sticks, you just have to be used to it.

 

Then why does Halo have auto-target if you can be very precise?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...