Ztalker Posted November 13, 2008 Posted November 13, 2008 VOTE SSPP. POSITIVE CHANGE AND HOPE '08. Technically, the power to use nuclear weapons isn't in our grasp when we win the election. It's an semi-anarchy, you see. Also, putting hope and a nuclear bomb on 1 single poster is a bit...controversial?
igyman Posted November 13, 2008 Posted November 13, 2008 Actually there is, look up what a dictatorship means sometime. wikipedia provides a good source, they only have a few exceptions to the rule as far as the people being or becoming monsters. I have looked it up a long time ago on both wikipedia and Webster's Dictionary, as well as a handful of other sources, most of them not in english. It is you who should look it up and actually read what it says there, instead of just looking at the pictures of tyrants posted there. No, a dictator has absolute power and goes out of his/her way to suppress all voices of dissent. No it's about tolitarian government where the dictator has absolute power and anyone that questions them, disappears. This is what I'm talking about. You obviously have no idea what a dictator is by definition. You can name a bunch of the worst examples (so can I: Hitler, Mussolini...), but it doesn't change the fact that you still don't get that these people were not dictators in the true sense of the word. They were evil, rotten tyrants and we of the GDP wholeheartedly condemn everything they did. *the grammatically correct word is totalitarian. However, dictatorship is an autocratic form, not totalitarian. Citizens, don't be swayed! Vote GDP!
CommanderQ Posted November 13, 2008 Posted November 13, 2008 Well, Ztalker, if you think about Anarchy, no rules, then wouldn't anyone be able to use a nuke? That is what the public asks! Question 5: What are the armanents of the candidates and how will they use these to help our fair forumites?
GarfieldJL Posted November 13, 2008 Posted November 13, 2008 I have looked it up a long time ago on both wikipedia and Webster's Dictionary, as well as a handful of other sources, most of them not in english. It is you who should look it up and actually read what it says there, instead of just looking at the pictures of tyrants posted there. I don't particularly care how you define it, we've already gone through the monstrosities of at least one dictator. I'm not about to surrender my freedoms to another one. This is what I'm talking about. You obviously have no idea what a dictator is by definition. You can name a bunch of the worst examples (so can I: Hitler, Mussolini...), but it doesn't change the fact that you still don't get that these people were not dictators in the true sense of the word. They were evil, rotten tyrants and we of the GDP wholeheartedly condemn everything they did. Again, why should anyone believe you, if you're a dictator you have absolute power. We've already gone through one set of dictators, heck I was front and center fighting them, I know what evils Dictators can and often do bring. You talk about all this stuff, yet you wouldn't be here if people like myself hadn't said enough is enough. I want accountability in government, a dictator has no accountability. I want transparency, Dictators just show propaganda. I could go on and on, but the point remains we don't need another petty dictator.
Darth InSidious Posted November 13, 2008 Posted November 13, 2008 The SSPP promises nukes for some, miniatures Ahtonian flags for others.
El Sitherino Posted November 13, 2008 Posted November 13, 2008 We've already gone through one set of dictators, heck I was front and center fighting them, I know what evils Dictators can and often do bring. I think I've finally figured it out, GarfieldJL is John McCain. You talk about all this stuff, yet you wouldn't be here if people like myself hadn't said enough is enough. Damn right.
GarfieldJL Posted November 13, 2008 Posted November 13, 2008 I think I've finally figured it out, GarfieldJL is John McCain. Sorry, I'm a bit young to be McCain, though I thank you for the compliment.
igyman Posted November 13, 2008 Posted November 13, 2008 I think I've finally figured it out, GarfieldJL is John McCain. Sorry, I'm a bit young to be McCain, though I thank you for the compliment. Aaahh, so that's why you're so aggressive and why you mix dictators and evil tyrants.
Yar-El Posted November 14, 2008 Posted November 14, 2008 Question to the candidates - Where does everyone stand on the creation of a taskforce to find this man?
CommanderQ Posted November 14, 2008 Posted November 14, 2008 Here is one more question from the CQBC. Question 6: What is your mascot {if you have one} and who would be your "hero," candidates?
Det. Bart Lasiter Posted November 14, 2008 Posted November 14, 2008 master shake i still hate this thread thread *ahtopres = (thread*)kavars
CommanderQ Posted November 14, 2008 Posted November 14, 2008 You still hate this thread? Negative person.
Arcesious Posted November 14, 2008 Posted November 14, 2008 The SSPP promises nukes for some, miniatures Ahtonian flags for others. What kind of nukes? They better not be those tiny 50 Megaton H-Bombs...
Darth InSidious Posted November 14, 2008 Posted November 14, 2008 What kind of nukes? They better not be those tiny 50 Megaton H-Bombs... Fey +1 Nukes of the Weasel with a damage bonus of +1-50,000 fire are the present plan.
CommanderQ Posted November 14, 2008 Posted November 14, 2008 You know, the CQBC could use some nukes to "provide news." Might I negotiate with you after the elections, should you win?
Arcesious Posted November 14, 2008 Posted November 14, 2008 Yay! Hey maybe could increase the yield a bit by adding Barab Ore Ingot crystals... They'd add +1-16,000 fire damage and instant knockdown DC 100 bonus and instant death DC 20 bonus.
El Sitherino Posted November 14, 2008 Posted November 14, 2008 Speaking of nukes, I'm thinking of dropping one on this thing from orbit.
Chevron 7 locke Posted November 14, 2008 Posted November 14, 2008 I'm gonna either go with SSP or DSMALL It's a tough choice...
Chevron 7 locke Posted November 14, 2008 Posted November 14, 2008 Just can't decide...the first post in the thread that i saw looked like it was cut off. I can't tell what i'm missing. I'd also like all the parties to say what they stand for. I'v been looking through the thread but all i see is attacks on the other parties
RedHawke Posted November 14, 2008 Posted November 14, 2008 Riiiiiiight For real... Still have my original .WRI documents, done on my good old 486/66 in WFW 3.11... I could probably turn the adventures we had into a fan fic but it likely would bore you all too much!
Samuel Dravis Posted November 14, 2008 Posted November 14, 2008 ... I'd also like all the parties to say what they stand for. I'v been looking ... but all i see is attacks on the other partiesIsn't that what politics is?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.