EnderWiggin Posted December 30, 2008 Share Posted December 30, 2008 You want to complain about human rights, why don't I see you raising issue about China's prison system or the Iranian Justice system? Before you began.... educating us in Kavar's, I'm pretty sure we had a thread about China's human rights, or at least talked about it during the Olympics. So, in fact, I do complain about China/Iran, but seeing as this thread's title is 'How to close Guantanamo," I figure it would be rude to derail it to talk about other, equally immoral things. They are also fanatics that are bent on killing any American they can. HUMAN fanatics. _EW_ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Det. Bart Lasiter Posted December 30, 2008 Share Posted December 30, 2008 Negative. Terrorists can be easily defined by their actions of targeting civilians, and using civilians as cover. The Department of Defense Dictionary of Military Terms defines terrorism as: Failing to follow the rules of warfare as defined by the Geneva Conventions places them in the category of terrorists. You want to complain about human rights, why don't I see you raising issue about China's prison system or the Iranian Justice system? First of all, these guys were shooting at our soldiers in Afghanistan and they weren't wearing any uniform, technically we could have just shot them as spies. They are also fanatics that are bent on killing any American they can. thank god we can get away with torture on a technicality Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonathan7 Posted December 30, 2008 Share Posted December 30, 2008 You want to complain about human rights, why don't I see you raising issue about China's prison system or the Iranian Justice system? This has already been addressed in thread - given many people here are American, they can actually change how there government acts - they can't really do much about China. However, if you want to be the 'good guys' you have to act like the 'good guys' having Gitmo is not acting like the 'good guys' its acting like everyone else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mimartin Posted December 30, 2008 Share Posted December 30, 2008 You want to complain about human rights, why don't I see you raising issue about China's prison system or the Iranian Justice system?[/Quote] Have you ever seen me praise either? Call me selfish, I just happen to care about my country more that Iran or China. First of all, these guys were shooting at our soldiers in Afghanistan and they weren't wearing any uniform, technically we could have just shot them as spies.[/Quote] Are we sure J7 hasn't taken over GarfieldJL's user name. This sounds like British troops talking about American troops during our fight for independence. How do you know they were not Farmers turned in for their bounty? Please explain how you could charge those capture such as Jamil al-Banna as a spy. He was not wearing a uniform, guess he is a spy. They are also fanatics that are bent on killing any American they can.Prove it. In a court of law. That is all I am asking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GarfieldJL Posted December 30, 2008 Share Posted December 30, 2008 This has already been addressed in thread - given many people here are American, they can actually change how there government acts - they can't really do much about China. However, if you want to be the 'good guys' you have to act like the 'good guys' having Gitmo is not acting like the 'good guys' its acting like everyone else. Well problem with the argument they are giving is that the accommodations are better at Gitmo than the US Prison system. Their living conditions are arguably better than what the guards get. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Det. Bart Lasiter Posted December 30, 2008 Share Posted December 30, 2008 Well problem with the argument they are giving is that the accommodations are better at Gitmo than the US Prison system. Their living conditions are arguably better than what the guards get.saying the detainees are being tortured in a classy prison cell isn't a very convincing argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GarfieldJL Posted December 30, 2008 Share Posted December 30, 2008 saying the detainees are being tortured in a classy prison cell isn't a very convincing argument. Very few of the detainees were tortured, and those that were were extremely high up the command structure of Al Qaeda, it was a situation where lives were at stake and several terror attacks were thwarted thanks to the information gained. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Det. Bart Lasiter Posted December 30, 2008 Share Posted December 30, 2008 Very few of the detainees were tortured, and those that were were extremely high up the command structure of Al Qaeda, it was a situation where lives were at stake and several terror attacks were thwarted thanks to the information gained.you have no way of knowing any of this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommycat Posted December 30, 2008 Share Posted December 30, 2008 you have no way of knowing any of this. Despite the fact that some here appear to believe I'm on the pro torture side, I think the real issue is that there is any torture at all. While I agree with the detainment, I disagree with torture. All of the detainees have been given tribunals to determine their status as combattants. Though really they should use the 190-8 instead of the rather arbitrary CSRT. As for Jamil al-Banna: While it isn't enough to hold a person(it's enough to at least look at him), he was close to Abu Qatada a known associate of al-Qaeda. Thin, but at least there was a reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astor Posted December 30, 2008 Share Posted December 30, 2008 Well problem with the argument they are giving is that the accommodations are better at Gitmo than the US Prison system. Their living conditions are arguably better than what the guards get. So, going by your statement, I trust you have first-hand experience of everything you've described. That is - 1. You must have spent time in a US Prison Cell. 2. You must also have spent time in 'Gitmo'. 3. You must have also spent time as a guard there. If not, how can you possibly report on the conditions there, other than hearing from either the Defense Department, or whatever reporters and Journalists which are allowed in there (who are no doubt paid by the Government to write favourable things)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GarfieldJL Posted December 30, 2008 Share Posted December 30, 2008 If you had paid attention to Fox News at all which didn't have an ax to grind when it comes to President Bush, they have had reporters there several times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astor Posted December 30, 2008 Share Posted December 30, 2008 If you had paid attention to Fox News at all which didn't have an ax to grind when it comes to President Bush, they have had reporters there several times. ...And i'll bet that they're only allowed there in the first place because they promise not to say bad things about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adavardes Posted December 30, 2008 Share Posted December 30, 2008 If you had paid attention to Fox News at all which didn't have an ax to grind when it comes to President Bush, they have had reporters there several times. Because you're so good at paying attention to all those "liberal-tilt news sources" out there, and listening to what they have to say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Det. Bart Lasiter Posted December 30, 2008 Share Posted December 30, 2008 If you had paid attention to Fox News at all which didn't have an ax to grind when it comes to President Bush, they have had reporters there several times.yep, and i'll bet the guards there walked them around the torture facilities and showed them every bit of the prison there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GarfieldJL Posted December 30, 2008 Share Posted December 30, 2008 yep, and i'll bet the guards there walked them around the torture facilities and showed them every bit of the prison there. [sarcasm]And yes here is the Iron Maiden over on your left[/sarcasm] Seriously, that was Abu Grabe (sp?) that had incidents of torture and those people involved were dealt with. (not sure who all got convicted but the point remains) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonathan7 Posted December 30, 2008 Share Posted December 30, 2008 Eh? http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/jun/09/guantanamo.humanrights http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8090 http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/06/18/gitmo.detainees/index.html Do you really want me to continue? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Det. Bart Lasiter Posted December 30, 2008 Share Posted December 30, 2008 [sarcasm]And yes here is the Iron Maiden over on your left[/sarcasm] Seriously, that was Abu Grabe (sp?) that had incidents of torture and those people involved were dealt with. (not sure who all got convicted but the point remains) yeah, all the low level guards who were ordered to torture people got charged. and if you think torture is restricted to just abu ghraib that's pretty naive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrrtoken Posted December 30, 2008 Share Posted December 30, 2008 Seriously, that was Abu Grabe (sp?) that had incidents of torture and those people involved were dealt with. (not sure who all got convicted but the point remains)How do you know that it didn't happen elsewhere, such as Guantanamo? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GarfieldJL Posted December 30, 2008 Share Posted December 30, 2008 How do you know that it didn't happen elsewhere, such as Guantanamo? To turn it around how do you know they did? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Det. Bart Lasiter Posted December 30, 2008 Share Posted December 30, 2008 To turn it around how do you know they did? Eh? http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/jun/09/guantanamo.humanrights http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8090 http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/06/18/gitmo.detainees/index.html Do you really want me to continue? woah hey look at that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astor Posted January 1, 2009 Share Posted January 1, 2009 Or' date=' more precisely, what to do with the inmates?[/quote'] To finally, and perhaps potentially answer Murph's original question: UK Call to Help Close Guantanamo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Web Rider Posted January 2, 2009 Share Posted January 2, 2009 To finally, and perhaps potentially answer Murph's original question: UK Call to Help Close Guantanamo. While I realize that not all Gitmo inmates are terrorists, I don't think it's wise to "resettle" the ones that are in countries that are already having difficulty with their Muslim populations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GarfieldJL Posted January 2, 2009 Share Posted January 2, 2009 Eh? http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/jun/09/guantanamo.humanrights http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8090 http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/06/18/gitmo.detainees/index.html Do you really want me to continue? If those are your star sources, your case is in real trouble. Considering, I don't believe any of them have even been to Gitmo in the first place. And some of these stories you're bringing up were outright proven false. WASHINGTON — Newsweek magazine on Monday retracted an article alleging abuse of the Koran at the Guantanamo Bay detention facility which sparked deadly anti-U.S. protests in Afghanistan and other Islamic countries. -- http://archive.japantoday.com/jp/news/337333/all Corroborating Source http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,156755,00.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Doctor Posted January 2, 2009 Share Posted January 2, 2009 Yet you, who has also never been to Gitmo, are enlightened enough to know that Very few of the detainees were tortured, and those that were were extremely high up the command structure of Al Qaeda, it was a situation where lives were at stake and several terror attacks were thwarted thanks to the information gained. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrrtoken Posted January 2, 2009 Share Posted January 2, 2009 If those are your star sources, your case is in real trouble. Considering, I don't believe any of them have even been to Gitmo in the first place. Then please explain, in great detail, the entire Guantanamo prison complex, from its cells to its mess halls. Seeing as you probably didn't read any of the articles, you'd find that in the second paragraph of the CNN one states that the research was carried out by an independent party, not by CNN themselves. And I'm still laughing, seeing as you're completely tossing out the truth, even when it's been backed up by three separate sources. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.