Jedi Master Revan Posted January 14, 2009 Share Posted January 14, 2009 I don't mean to offend anyone by asking this question, have you seen all the Star Wars episodes or even know the entire plot? If you have which all of you should know, then let me share something with you: After Old Republic ( time period episode 1 - 6 ) Knights Of The Old Republic ( time period anytime before the first episode ) notice the same plot lines! A.O.R 3 main characters in the first 3 movies Anakin Skywalker Obi-Wan-Kenobi Padme? then another 3 main charaters in the next 3 Leia Organa - Leia Skywalker Luke Skywalker Han Solo Sith Leader ( he was hiding at first! ) Darth Sidious Powerful Platform! Deathstar Lovers are two of the main characters Anakin Skywalker and Padma Han Solo and Leia Organa aka. Skywalker K.O.T.O.R Revan Bastila Shan Carth Onasi Sith Leader ( he was hiding at first as well! ) 'True Sith' emperor Powerful Platform Star Forge Lovers are two of the main characters Revan Bastila Shan This is the foundation of every star wars major epic event, the sith in A.O.R almsot destroy jedi through planning and secrecy, the Sith are no different in the K.O.T.O.R version, however the Jedi in both of them find themselves regenerating in strength through the cunning and wisdom of ONE jedi, Luke Skywalker and Obi-Wan-Kenobi as he dents the Sith's plans to wipe out most of the jedi by killing the apprentice of Darth Sidious but i think it's just Luke Skywalker My prediction for the outcome of K.O.T.O.R 3; Revan dies by killing the emperor as Anakin did against the Emperor, Bastila survives the war and becomes one of the wisest, and rebellion within the 'True Sith' empire and the Mandalorians ( they act as the Rebellion in the A.O.R ) wipe out the Sith menace and the Sith are reborn through rouge jedi; hint i never said all the Sith would be destroyed after the death of the emperor just nearly all of them and the order of the Sith would be reborn through the rouge jedi. what do you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrrtoken Posted January 14, 2009 Share Posted January 14, 2009 This is why I don't play KotOR I anymore; BioWare lacks unique and original plots and dialogue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ctrl Alt Del Posted January 14, 2009 Share Posted January 14, 2009 Sith Leader ( he was hiding at first as well! ) 'True Sith' emperor The True Sith are a creation of K2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darca Lar Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 In this day and age its hard to find something truly unique, so we do what we can by taking what we already have and tweaking it to the best of our ability so its still an enjoyable area to be explored until something new comes along. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adamqd Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 There's a fine line between Originality and it ceasing to be Star Wars, If you dont like Cloak and Dagger, recurring motifs and Childhood reminiscences, the Continuity aint for you... well, there is TSL and the NJO though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Doctor Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 Continuity aint for you... well, there is TSL You obviously didn't play TSL properly then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ztalker Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 Bioware deliberately did this: Red=kotor blue=movies -Cyborg enemy Malak Vader -Plottwist involving him Friends/identity Father -Military power at large Sith Empire -Military design: Star Destroyers, A-wing -Droid humor: HK, T3 C3p0 -Uber power padawan Player (Revan) Luke -Cocky princess Bastilla Leia -Wookiee Zalbaar Chewie -Bird-named ship Ebon Hawk Millennium Falcon Shall I go on? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TKA-001 Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 -Uber power padawan Player (Revan) Luke Are we talking about the same Luke who was straining for five minutes just to pull his lightsaber out of some snow? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adamqd Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 You obviously didn't play TSL properly then. So you think TSL is unoriginal and a lot like the Movies and didn't try doing it's own thing? if the answer is no, "You obviously didn't read my Post properly then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Doctor Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 Yes, because the Star Wars movies are just as dialogue driven and character oriented as TSL was, for sure. Fact of the matter is, TSL was an original idea, as far as Star Wars is concerned. Maybe not in the concept of the story, fine, but in the fact that the true nature of the story was unveiled through dialogue more than explosions and space battles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpaceAlex Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 Just let it go, dudes. As long as you enjoy the game, what does it matter? If you find yourself not enjoying the game anymore after figuring out it's not as "original" as you wanted it to be, simply forget about it and move on. P.S. Bioware obviously made the game similar to OT on purpose - not because they're unable to write something "original". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adamqd Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 ~ edit: Hindsight being 20/20 forget it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ztalker Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 Are we talking about the same Luke who was straining for five minutes just to pull his lightsaber out of some snow? And the same Luke who, after two weeks of walking around with Yoda defeated the most powerful (potentially) Sith Lord(s) in the galaxy. Yah. Same dude Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emperor Devon Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 Just let it go, dudes. As long as you enjoy the game, what does it matter? If you find yourself not enjoying the game anymore after figuring out it's not as "original" as you wanted it to be, simply forget about it and move on. ^ This is why I don't play KotOR I anymore; BioWare lacks unique and original plots and dialogue. yeah god forbid a story have three lead characters with a central antagonist just what the hell man so overdone BIOWARE SUCKS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TKA-001 Posted January 17, 2009 Share Posted January 17, 2009 And the same Luke who, after two weeks of walking around with Yoda defeated the most powerful (potentially) Sith Lord(s) in the galaxy. Yah. Same dude The only reason Vader was the second-most powerful Sith in the galaxy was because he composed 50% of all Sith during that time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darca Lar Posted January 17, 2009 Share Posted January 17, 2009 he was also more robotic so his force was actually less than beforehand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sabretooth Posted January 17, 2009 Share Posted January 17, 2009 Aye, BioWare said they did that in purpose, because they wanted KotOR to feel like and be sorta parallel to the movies saga. Pretty good job at that, btw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralPloKoon Posted January 17, 2009 Share Posted January 17, 2009 Actually when viewing the time of the old republic I view KOTOR all the way up to Episode I before the Clone Wars. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ztalker Posted January 17, 2009 Share Posted January 17, 2009 The only reason Vader was the second-most powerful Sith in the galaxy was because he composed 50% of all Sith during that time. he was also more robotic so his force was actually less than beforehand. I meant Palpatine, actually. And the (potentially) was meant for Vader. Still, my point stands. Vader bested all Jedi during the purge. And a two-weeks trained farmer bested him. And Palpatine, who bested Yoda. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ctrl Alt Del Posted January 17, 2009 Share Posted January 17, 2009 I meant Palpatine, actually. Wasn't Luke positively owned by Palpy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralPloKoon Posted January 17, 2009 Share Posted January 17, 2009 I believe he was I remember Luke being the one in pain and Palpatine was doing all the laughing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jedi Master Revan Posted January 18, 2009 Author Share Posted January 18, 2009 erm what a way to start a thread and i havent even finished it!lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ztalker Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 Wasn't Luke positively owned by Palpy? I believe he was I remember Luke being the one in pain and Palpatine was doing all the laughing. Psychological victory is a victory too. Anyways, he bested Palpatine later in a lightsaber duel as well according to EU. I'll stick with the argument of Vader owned every single old Republic Jedi and Luke owned Vader. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Hord Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 Psychological victory is a victory too. Anyways, he bested Palpatine later in a lightsaber duel as well according to EU. There was circumstances around that such as Luke receiving "strength" from from two others of Skywalker blood; his sister Leia and the unborn baby Anakin Solo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jedi Master Revan Posted January 21, 2009 Author Share Posted January 21, 2009 hey i like you ideas in the response to this thread and all my other thread, however i will warn you if you are going to just reply with: just get over it its a game or anything that isn't related to the topic will be given a warning from me from now on, if you do this twice i will report you to the admin for inappropraite replys to a thread and the fact that they aren't even relevant to the thread, i mean come on whats the point giving a complete negative comment to a peson who tries to keep the spark alive, thats what a forum is for, talking and experessing ideas, so please don't do it and think of how others will react before replying, thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.