pbguy1211 Posted July 10, 2003 Posted July 10, 2003 wouldnt sig images take up more bandwidth than friggin' glow?
Surfnshannon Posted July 10, 2003 Author Posted July 10, 2003 well I don't think there was ever a question of glow and bandwith. The sigs do cause some users problems...but luckily there is a feature to them off. I'm pro sigs too. I don't like all this conformity..plus I love the sig Rhett made me.
Tyrion Posted July 11, 2003 Posted July 11, 2003 I'm definitely all up for it. [And Carl,just shut it.]
pbguy1211 Posted July 11, 2003 Posted July 11, 2003 that is a pretty cool looking sig image. i wish i knew what the hell i was doing with photoshop and how to get the most out of it
Shotokan Posted July 11, 2003 Posted July 11, 2003 It doesn't matter much to me, but I still like my glowy name. I vote yes.
Mandalorian54 Posted July 11, 2003 Posted July 11, 2003 I like glow names, but everyone has them. they've just got no significance anymore. I like the Idea of needing a certain number of posts.
benTantilles Posted July 11, 2003 Posted July 11, 2003 lucasforums is unique in that it his this points system as well as the glow name thingy...taking either away (not that the former is in question...) will remove something dear to the hearts of lucasforum posters by depriving us of an element of our identity.
swphreak Posted July 11, 2003 Posted July 11, 2003 actually, I think other forums have the point system to If it is possible, I wouldn't mind it, but if it slows down the installing of the new hack, I say no.
ZBomber Posted July 11, 2003 Posted July 11, 2003 Originally posted by StarWarsPhreak actually, I think other forums have the point system to If it is possible, I wouldn't mind it, but if it slows down the installing of the new hack, I say no. There are LOTS of forums that have the point system. I hope we have sigs more than glows, because they are lots of fun to make. But I would like both to stay.
volcom Posted July 11, 2003 Posted July 11, 2003 GLOW WILL NOT GO, GLOW WILL NOT GO! i love my glow name please keep glow
Arreat Posted July 12, 2003 Posted July 12, 2003 I say pro store! I like all the features the store has. I really want it to stay. If not then just pro glow + custom name + italics + sig.
Khier Posted July 12, 2003 Posted July 12, 2003 Well I've got this cool img sig made up for me that matches the colour of my glow nicely . I have no clue about what this new hack thingy is but if the sigs and glows can be saved, please do. I vote to keep them.
TheMaestro Posted July 12, 2003 Posted July 12, 2003 They're nice, but if they have to go -- I understand too. Btw...someone changed my title to DJG, then donated 1500 points to me...this have anything to do with these "hackers?"
Surfnshannon Posted July 12, 2003 Author Posted July 12, 2003 i gave you credits - I'm passing them around like candy. It doesn't have anything to do with hackers.
pbguy1211 Posted July 12, 2003 Posted July 12, 2003 why dont they just disable the ability to change the title's of other people... which they seem to have already done. what else is wrong? while we're on the subject... i guess i cant add a sig picture now can i? i tried but it doesnt seem to let me.
Eldritch Posted July 12, 2003 Posted July 12, 2003 I've got to agree with Agen and some of the others in here. I think that sig pics are a good way to showcase creativity, so long as they're kept within boundries for those on dial-up. Put a cap on filesize, like with the avatars. The glowy names I don't care one way or the other about, but I think that the glowy names (and the sig) should be dependent on post count. And STTCT, how in the hell do you have 270,000 points?
Guest Jed Posted July 12, 2003 Posted July 12, 2003 I cannot see the value in this... Nor do I understand the total and almost violent support for it... But alas, I respect everyone's decision. Still...it boggles my mind.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.