Negative Sun Posted August 14, 2007 Posted August 14, 2007 ..then Bourne fails for being an American. I'm sure every single European at these forums would vote Bond every day over Bourne. Nope, he's English...
Cygnus Q'ol Posted August 14, 2007 Posted August 14, 2007 CHUCK NORRIS IS THE BEST!! Yeah, except for that one time when my man Bruce Lee got a hold of him.
Gargoyle King Posted August 14, 2007 Posted August 14, 2007 @GK, I honestly didn't care about your opinion and was going to mess with you no matter what you said. But if you have any mention of Chuck Norris in your post, then all else is moot.You don't have to care about my opinion (most people don't ). I take it you're not a fan of Chuck Norris then?Yeah' date=' except for that one time when my man [b']Bruce Lee[/b] got a hold of him. The ultimate battle between two warriors!
RedHawke Posted August 14, 2007 Posted August 14, 2007 Nope, he's English... Bourne? Not in the 2 movies I have seen he isn't. At the end of 2 he is told he was born in like Tupelo, Mississippi or something like that.
Achilles Posted August 14, 2007 Posted August 14, 2007 I'm sure every single European at these forums would vote Bond every day over Bourne. Ah, it all makes sense now. I couldn't figure out how so many people could get it wrong, but now I realize they're voting with cultural bias.
Negative Sun Posted August 14, 2007 Posted August 14, 2007 Bourne? Not in the 2 movies I have seen he isn't. I was talking about Bond
Jediknight1818 Posted August 16, 2007 Posted August 16, 2007 How about Norris and Bruce Lee vs. Bond and Bourne, now thats a movie to see!! (I know that Bruce Lee is dead but I still think he could kick a**)
JediMasterJambi Posted August 16, 2007 Posted August 16, 2007 How about Norris and Bruce Lee vs. Bond and Bourne, now thats a movie to see!! (I know that Bruce Lee is dead but I still think he could kick a**) This would be a slaughter, not a movie. Chuck Norris and Bruce Lee are the ultimate fighters of the universe. In that particular match-up, the ultimate outcome for Bourne and Bond would be the following:
The Seeker Posted August 16, 2007 Posted August 16, 2007 Bah, in this epic battle between heroes, the ultimate winner would be the evil mastermind who instigated it: Earth is in trouble now.
Corinthian Posted August 18, 2007 Posted August 18, 2007 Bruce Lee can still kick ass from beyond the grave. Bond might get away alive by telling horrible puns until Lee started screaming in agony, then getting in his supercar and hightailing it out of there. Bourne would grab a headstone or a shovel and fight with Lee, only to find that you can't kill Lee - Lee already dead.
Fredi Posted August 18, 2007 Posted August 18, 2007 ..then Bourne fails for being an American. I'm sure every single European at these forums would vote Bond every day over Bourne. haha I love when this happens..... I always go to the one going against the americans (USA)..
Taos Posted August 21, 2007 Posted August 21, 2007 I have to say that Bourne has over-taken Bond for the top spy movies IMO at least. Though Daniel Craig is just getting started and I think he's fantastic, so there is hope for Bond in the future. Dare I say Craig is better then Connery? Yes I said it. Ok to the question at hand - Bourne vs Bond in a fight. I give the nod to Bourne - he could kill you with a 3x5 notecard if he had to. Bond relies too much on gagets and fancy stuff, Bourne takes what is available to him and makes it work.
PoiuyWired Posted August 21, 2007 Posted August 21, 2007 Bond can also turn any female object into some mindless follower...
Commander Obi-Wan Posted August 22, 2007 Posted August 22, 2007 Ok to the question at hand - Bourne vs Bond in a fight. I give the nod to Bourne - he could kill you with a 3x5 notecard if he had to. Bond relies too much on gagets and fancy stuff, Bourne takes what is available to him and makes it work. Well, in Casino Royale, James Bond didn't really have any gadgets. He just had his gun, and likewise with Bourne. James Bond, otherwise just utilized what he had, like Jason Bourne.
Achilles Posted August 22, 2007 Posted August 22, 2007 Well, in Casino Royale, James Bond didn't really have any gadgets. He just had his gun, and likewise with Bourne. James Bond, otherwise just utilized what he had, like Jason Bourne. Right so pre-Bourne movie, Bond has a bunch of gadgets, never really gets bloody, etc. Then we have the Bourne movies where the hero doesn't use gadgets, gets bloody, etc. Then we have "new-Bond" where the hero also doesn't use gadgets, gets bloody, etc. Some people might view that as the Bond franchise adjusting to be like the more-realistic Bourne franchise. Hmmm....
Jeff Posted August 22, 2007 Posted August 22, 2007 I don't really think there was much influence from the Bourne series on the new Bond. The reason he didn't have any gadgets was because it took place before Q-branch or any of that was part of MI6. Besides, James was as smooth with the ladies as ever.
Corinthian Posted August 22, 2007 Posted August 22, 2007 If things started going badly, a Bond Girl would rescue Bond. It's how these things work.
Taos Posted August 22, 2007 Posted August 22, 2007 Right so pre-Bourne movie, Bond has a bunch of gadgets, never really gets bloody, etc. Then we have the Bourne movies where the hero doesn't use gadgets, gets bloody, etc. Then we have "new-Bond" where the hero also doesn't use gadgets, gets bloody, etc. Some people might view that as the Bond franchise adjusting to be like the more-realistic Bourne franchise. Hmmm.... Makes you think here...yes. /end yoda speak Well, in Casino Royale, James Bond didn't really have any gadgets. He just had his gun, and likewise with Bourne. James Bond, otherwise just utilized what he had, like Jason Bourne. I will give you that one...but that's just one in 3429879 Bond movies.
Rogue Warrior Posted September 18, 2007 Posted September 18, 2007 Give us Bond (Daniel Craig) and Bauer and that will be a fight.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.