Alkonium Posted January 10, 2006 Posted January 10, 2006 Possibly. Destroying all guns would do nothing to explosives and melee weapons.
Darth InSidious Posted January 10, 2006 Posted January 10, 2006 ...Or nukes. Or chemical weapons. Or catapults. Or any sort of projectile. And even if you did, someone would start making them. Unless you are proposing to remove the very meme from the whole of Earth's causality, fundamentally upsetting history. Which is impossible, anyhow.
MTV2 Posted January 10, 2006 Posted January 10, 2006 First of all, it's impossible to destroy all guns, someone somewhere will always have a gun. ^^^^ Pretty much what my second point was nothings impossible... if the government really wanted to get rid of all guns, they will go to the extreme, if that means going to everyone house and getting a search warrant to search. once guns are destroyed(if they do get destroyed) dont u think that someone might make another one? import them?
The Doctor Posted January 10, 2006 Posted January 10, 2006 ^ That's what will happen if guns are banned/destroyed. It's like drugs and prostitution - outlawing them just makes things worse. Also, destroying all guns would out our country/countries in danger from countries that do have guns.
Aash Li Posted January 10, 2006 Posted January 10, 2006 Oh I got it!! Get rid of all the gun powder and all the bullets! Then people can use their guns to bludgeon people! XD </sarcasm>
Darth InSidious Posted January 10, 2006 Posted January 10, 2006 Oh I got it!! Get rid of all the gun powder and all the bullets! Then people can use their guns to bludgeon people! XD </sarcasm> I do believe you're on to something! If we just zap the chemical elements out of causality...So simple! </further sarcasm>
Snafu7 Posted January 11, 2006 Posted January 11, 2006 if the government really wanted to get rid of all guns, they will go to the extreme, if that means going to everyone house and getting a search warrant to search. Right there is one of the reasons we have guns, to prevent the government from doing something that extreme.
Hallucination Posted January 11, 2006 Posted January 11, 2006 No. It wouldn't do anything except make people start using rocks, and I don't like rocks. And, like many people said here, it wouldn't stop anyone. Besides, it wouldn't really affect me, with only 64 guns murders per year here(Canada). P.S. Its destroy, not 'destory'.
Sabretooth Posted January 11, 2006 Posted January 11, 2006 No, but if I had the power, I would prevent guns from being used and store them, not destroy them. It's just something within me that tells me to do so... <_< >_> Regardless, if guns are destroyed, mankind will develop a new, more deadly weapon. In the end, the only weapons there are, are human minds, seeking for dominance over the pathetic piece of rock we call Earth.
Astrotoy7 Posted January 11, 2006 Posted January 11, 2006 lolz.....destroying guns would do jack ****.... remember the Romans, the Mongolians, The Warring Chinese Kingdoms, The Ottomans, The Vikings, The Barbarians, The Crusaders etc..... they all managed to kill millions with no guns... its human nature to be destructive... face it Plus, you'd make Charlton Heston cry.... lolz mtfbwya
RedHawke Posted January 11, 2006 Posted January 11, 2006 You'll get my guns when you pry them from my cold dead hands! *Flees thread before getting pelted with rotten fruit*
CapNColostomy Posted January 11, 2006 Posted January 11, 2006 No, but if I had the power, I would prevent guns from being used and store them, not destroy them. Congratulations on making less practical sense than the question posed in the thread. I seem to be all out of prizes (hats labled "YOU'RE A DUMBASS"), but know that you hold a special place in internet history for me.
Sabretooth Posted January 11, 2006 Posted January 11, 2006 Congratulations on making less practical sense than the question posed in the thread. I seem to be all out of prizes (hats labled "YOU'RE A DUMBASS"), but know that you hold a special place in internet history for me. I was hoping somebody realised it was plain sarcasm at work...
Astrotoy7 Posted January 11, 2006 Posted January 11, 2006 lolz...sabres ninja sarcasm strikes again @CapN..Nice to see you in these parts. Have a brewski mtfbwya
Sabretooth Posted January 11, 2006 Posted January 11, 2006 lolz...sabres ninja sarcasm strikes again Gee, I didn't know I was sarcastic.
Rogue15 Posted January 11, 2006 Posted January 11, 2006 no...but if it happened, there are crossbows...
Prime Posted January 11, 2006 Posted January 11, 2006 no...but if it happened, there are crossbows...How quickly can you kill with a crossbow compared to an AK-47?
RC-1162 Posted January 11, 2006 Posted January 11, 2006 PS. Those guys in your sig? Those are guns they're toting dude, thats in a game. life is NOT a game.
El Sitherino Posted January 11, 2006 Posted January 11, 2006 life is NOT a game. Milton Bradley disagrees.
Darth InSidious Posted January 11, 2006 Posted January 11, 2006 How quickly can you kill with a crossbow compared to an AK-47? Relatively quickly. The main problem is the ice age it takes to reload the damn things, the constant maintenance requirements...If you really want an even remotely comparable weapon for speed/distance/accuracy, the Longbow is the thing Congratulations on making less practical sense than the question posed in the thread. I seem to be all out of prizes (hats labled "YOU'RE A DUMBASS"), but know that you hold a special place in internet history for me. Ooh, can I have one? @Hall: What's wrong with destory? Deplot's perfect @RC: It's very easy to make comments like that, but how do you explain things like the kid who thought he was Neo? It just proves that there will always be some people who cannot tell fact from fiction. Or are really, really deluded. Either way, guns anywhere will mean guns somewhere else. You can't just destroy them all, destroy all knowledge of them etc etc etc, and then have them in games. It wouldn't work. It would be like lightsabres when no civilisation on the Earth had never invented swords...Also, the original gun, the "arquibusier" (sp?) was so damn simple that to not invent it would speak volumes about the stupidity of our race...
El Sitherino Posted January 11, 2006 Posted January 11, 2006 Well I think the speed of the kill with a crossbow relies on how ****ty a shot you are. If you can't hit a fat man 2 feet in front of you, you're probably going to have a more humane kill with the AK than with the crossbow.
Prime Posted January 11, 2006 Posted January 11, 2006 Well I think the speed of the kill with a crossbow relies on how ****ty a shot you are. If you can't hit a fat man 2 feet in front of you, you're probably going to have a more humane kill with the AK than with the crossbow.How about 20 fat men?
El Sitherino Posted January 11, 2006 Posted January 11, 2006 You should probably just shoot yourself at that point. Save some other guy the trouble.
Prime Posted January 11, 2006 Posted January 11, 2006 I mean, how fast can you kill 20 guys with a crossbow compared to an AK?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.