Pho3nix Posted May 7, 2007 Share Posted May 7, 2007 So...disturbing. Damn :< it got deleted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Son of Skywalker15 Posted May 7, 2007 Share Posted May 7, 2007 QFT Definately not as good as the other two, but it wasn't like with X3 where I left feeling angry that I just wasted two hours. All in all, I found it to be a pretty sweet ride with only minor qualms. Indeed. Spider-Man 3 was a movie that wasn't as good as I thought it would be, but after all the hype it got, what movie would be? All the good parts were already known, and trying to fit 3 plots in was crazy. Besides that, it was a good quality but left me a little disappointed. But hey, all the more reason for a possible Spider-Man 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ET Warrior Posted May 7, 2007 Share Posted May 7, 2007 all the more reason for a possible Spider-Man 4 http://www.rottentomatoes.com/news/comments/?entryid=419069 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrWally Posted May 7, 2007 Share Posted May 7, 2007 I'd love to see Carnage in a Spiderman movie. But 3 villains again might be a bit too much :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarthAve Posted May 7, 2007 Share Posted May 7, 2007 Carnage of Black Cat. xD Or maybe one of the villians from that sweet ass MTV spiderman series (The cel shaded one that was so fly). Like Electro or Silver Sable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Son of Skywalker15 Posted May 7, 2007 Share Posted May 7, 2007 I'd love to see Carnage in a Spiderman movie. But 3 villains again might be a bit too much :/ I was thinking the same thing... Perhaps just 2. I personally want to see Carnage and Black Cat, but that's just me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jebbers Posted May 8, 2007 Share Posted May 8, 2007 Here's some gifs from the movie. Photobucket shrunk down my gif of the pie scene from 400x170 to 50x52! So this is all I have to offer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Son of Skywalker15 Posted May 8, 2007 Share Posted May 8, 2007 This is something I never got: The man ( Peter) can go through 3 panels of glass coming out without a scratch on him, yet when he's punched once ( not sure if it's exactly once) he loses his mask and his costume is ripped. I just thought it was funny. Something interesting to know: Tobey Maguire is claustrophobic.... Ironic for a mask wearing super hero.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lightsaberboy Posted May 9, 2007 Share Posted May 9, 2007 Look at him shake that money-maker! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lorden Darkblade Posted May 9, 2007 Share Posted May 9, 2007 Man... That scene was ridiculous if you ask me... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lightsaberboy Posted May 9, 2007 Share Posted May 9, 2007 Apparently Lucas didn't like Spider-Man 3, saying it was ridiculous http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,270874,00.html Here's a snippet where he mentions it. Lucas told me he has seen all the summer movies since his company, Industrial Light and Magic, does most of the special effects. The only one they didn't work on was "Spider-Man 3." What did he think of it? "It's silly. It's a silly movie," he said. "There just isn't much there. Once you take it all apart, there's not much story, is there?" Well, it's not "Star Wars." "People thought 'Star Wars' was silly, too," he added, with a wink. "But it wasn't." I can only imagine Lucas giving a wink. For some reason the image disturbs me. not to mention his whole statement seems a bit ironic coming from him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prime Posted May 9, 2007 Share Posted May 9, 2007 That little panzy stole my move! Except I wear a white suit with black polka-dots and buttons that light up and a matching top hat. And a monkey too! Good thing you threw in that last bit. Otherwise you would have been hearing from my lawyers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curt-Man Posted May 13, 2007 Share Posted May 13, 2007 I thought it was great all around. Did it follow any spiderman timeline/thing well? not really, but it worked. And I think if you had some wicked amazing powers and a baddass black suit, you'd do some whack stuff too, why? because you can. I thought sandman looked great, and Thomas Church who played him did well. I think for spiderman 4, Lizard and Kraven the Hunter would be a good mix, but maybe thats just me. Maybe Rhino just to make it classic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rev7 Posted October 28, 2007 Share Posted October 28, 2007 I have to say that it was a very good movie, and I can't wait til it comes out on October 30! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ET Warrior Posted October 28, 2007 Share Posted October 28, 2007 wow. Five month thread necromancing. To talk about one of the worst movies of all time. Cool? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Groovy Posted October 30, 2007 Share Posted October 30, 2007 wow. Five month thread necromancing. To talk about one of the worst movies of all time. Cool? No sir. Spider-Man 3 is suffering from a trend over the last decade and if you look back, you will agree with me on this one. All movies that involve super heroes on a third sequel basically suck. Now Spider-Man 3 is not one of the worst ones out there. I liked it, but I also expected more. Still....it suffered the same curse. Now if you want to talk about one of the worst movies of all times, that would be The Blair Witch Project, the king daddy of all stinky movies, of all time. And I will be more than willing to argue that one until I breath my last breath. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rev7 Posted November 25, 2007 Share Posted November 25, 2007 wow. Five month thread necromancing. To talk about one of the worst movies of all time. Cool? I actually though that it wasn't that bad of a movie. But opinions mean nothing in the eyes of a critic/ doesn't have any value to anyone, but that really doesn't mean anything. {Wait a sec, don't critics give their opinions?} No sir. Spider-Man 3 is suffering from a trend over the last decade and if you look back, you will agree with me on this one. All movies that involve super heroes on a third sequel basically suck. Now Spider-Man 3 is not one of the worst ones out there. No I don't think that Spider-Man 3 was one of the worst ones out there, but wasn't the greatest out there. I would rank the movie a 8/10 personally. B's aren't bad at all. I also agree the " movies that invovle super heroes on a third sequel basically suck" part. Generally that is what tends to happen. But of course, most of this is IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.