jawathehutt Posted March 1, 2008 Share Posted March 1, 2008 we live in AUS and it IS 100$!!! and if we buy on internet its different money and it adds up to 100$ AUS MONEY!!!!!!!!...........................fags........ Grow up and never use words like that again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ctrl Alt Del Posted March 1, 2008 Share Posted March 1, 2008 I believe that BF3 is going to be exactly like Kotor and Mass Effect. Where it is going to be ported to the PC due to its immense popularity Well, BF was always released on the PCs along with the consoles. I don't see why the third wouldn't follow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeadYorick Posted March 1, 2008 Share Posted March 1, 2008 Well, BF was always released on the PCs along with the consoles. I don't see why the third wouldn't follow. Who knows how game company monopolies work. Maybe this is just part of a big gaming conspiracy to overthrow the competition and take over the gaming world Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ctrl Alt Del Posted March 2, 2008 Share Posted March 2, 2008 As long as they have Hutts on leading positions... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkjedimonkey Posted March 3, 2008 Share Posted March 3, 2008 As long as they have Hutts on leading positions... right. anyways. i dont think they will just have it on PS3 or 360 or just PC they will have it on PC because its just traditional. but they have to keep the mainstream going. i.e. little eight year olds with rich parent who like star wars... alot it think it will end up coming out on all the systems Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tyrone333 Posted March 4, 2008 Share Posted March 4, 2008 Grow up and never use words like that again. Nice statement mate BF3 for ps3 and 360 is crap and bull**** it can't be out and the xbox 360 for. 100 bucks is bull I live in Australia their around 300 to 500 Anyway at least jawa knows that this is bull**** like others know it is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeathKnight23 Posted March 4, 2008 Share Posted March 4, 2008 Nice statement mate BF3 for ps3 and 360 is crap and bull**** it can't be out and the xbox 360 for. 100 bucks is bull I live in Australia their around 300 to 500 Anyway at least jawa knows that this is bull**** like others know it is Jeez calm down, lets not get to wound up here over this. I'm sure they'll see sense and bring it out on all consoles, as that way they'll get the most money from people buying it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NL_Sudentor Posted March 4, 2008 Share Posted March 4, 2008 Jeez calm down, lets not get to wound up here over this. I'm sure they'll see sense and bring it out on all consoles, as that way they'll get the most money from people buying it. indeed, it would be foolish if they would only bring it out on xbox 360. The more platforms they make it for the more profits they receive. And is it expensive to make the game for another console?? I don't think so Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tyrone333 Posted March 9, 2008 Share Posted March 9, 2008 Ya Think? if it's for xbox 360 and ps3 i'm going to burn Every LucasArts product i own! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NL_Sudentor Posted March 9, 2008 Share Posted March 9, 2008 Ya Think? if it's for xbox 360 and ps3 i'm going to burn Every LucasArts product i own! Why Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralPloKoon Posted March 9, 2008 Share Posted March 9, 2008 The 360 is a really good console people.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jawathehutt Posted March 9, 2008 Share Posted March 9, 2008 They should still make it for all the systems, PC included Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Onihikage Posted March 10, 2008 Share Posted March 10, 2008 Let's examine the evidence we can rest assured is valid: the evidence on FR's website. In the Games section, we can see beside the "Top Secret" picture a title: "Secret LucasArts Project (NextGen Platforms) - TBA" Let's assume (for lack of REAL conflicting information) that the "project" is BFIII. First of all, we can make a note of several things: 1) The game will be classified as "NextGen" 2) The game will be on more than one "NextGen" console (note the plural "platforms") Looking at the other games on their list, we realize more things about their game production habits. Firstly, observe the consoles their games have been released on: PS2 / PS3: TimeSplitters, TimeSplitters 2, Second Sight, TimeSplitters Future Perfect, HAZE XBOX (none on 360 yet): TimeSplitters 2, Second Sight, TimeSplitters Future Perfect GC: TimeSplitters 2, Second Sight, TimeSplitters Future Perfect PC: Second Sight From the above information, I make these predictions on the unknowns on the page: TimeSplitters 4: PS3, XBOX 360 Secret Project: PS3, XBOX 360, PC Now my reasons for the predictions are these. First of all, "NextGen Platforms" must logically include both the PS3 and XBOX 360, so they are given (obvious, I know). If the "Secret Project" is indeed Battlefront III, It will probably be on the PC. The reason I believe this is because PC games are easily moddable and therefore last much longer in the higher ranks than comparable "static" games. I would have lost interest in Empire at War and the Battlefield series long ago if it weren't for the mods available for each. From a marketing perspective: the PS3 and XBOX 360 are the most powerful NextGen Consoles on the market, and would be the best picks for a FPS with as big a hype as Battlefront III. Both of the other BF, as well a substantial amount of other Star Wars games have come out for the PC if at all on the consoles; this therefore means that many fans of Star Wars games will have a PC, because of the volume of good games for it. I doubt FR would ignore such a large portion of Star Wars gamers. In short, more gamers for a console = more buyers = more $$$; the vast majority of SW Gamers either have a PC, or a console from Sony or Microsoft (or all three, as some have). The smart thing would be for them to create an easily moddable version for the PC, then give the two console versions a whole bunch of extras that couldn't be duplicated by mods on the PC. This would create double sales from many who own a PC and a Console - the gamer buys the PC version for the mods, and the version for the console of their choice for all the extras. I'm starting to see more games built this way in the attempt to get more sales on the same game, and the people at Free Radical are clearly not stupid; they'll likely attempt the same. The only difference is they'll actually be successful. Those are my reasons: FR will make BFIII on the PS3 according to FR's production habits, on the 360 (because it's another NextGen console), and the PC because LucasArts / Battlefront tradition dictates it to at least be on PC. Another reason that applies to having all three is so the game is available to a wider range of gamers, and therefore make more money. To whoever said it above: yes, making video games costs a lot of money in itself, but it would actually be more expensive to make two video games than it would be to make a single game on multiple consoles; why do you think they do it all the time? To jawathehutt: I think it'll be 4.5m O, but 2.25m O2, depending on whether you wanted the natural diatomic state or not (I think, seeing as how there'd be 1.5m O2 and 3m O in CaCO3). I could be wrong, but I don't have my chemistry teacher on hand to ask, so I'll go with the answer of 2.25m of O2. Correct me if I'm wrong, please. But I digress... oh, and about the LucasArts "dropping" Star Wars? To that I say, "A bigger load of yellow journalism I've never seen." (I could say worse things, but that would be against my religious principles) LucasArts formed a PARTNERSHIP with Free Radical, that's not the same as dropping Star Wars and handing it over to some other company. It'd never happen in the first place though, so why even bring it up? If I've made any goof-ups, please point them out so that I may correct them. Thank you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jawathehutt Posted March 10, 2008 Share Posted March 10, 2008 I mostly agree with you but I have one question, how much freaking time do you have lol? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tyrone333 Posted March 10, 2008 Share Posted March 10, 2008 Lol Still it woulden't be fair for pc owners for mods sure theres downloadble content for 360 But Still it would be crap if it was for ps3 and 360 Jawa for once i'm with you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NL_Sudentor Posted March 10, 2008 Share Posted March 10, 2008 Let's examine the evidence we can rest assured is valid: the evidence on FR's website. In the Games section, we can see beside the "Top Secret" picture a title: "Secret LucasArts Project (NextGen Platforms) - TBA" Let's assume (for lack of REAL conflicting information) that the "project" is BFIII. First of all, we can make a note of several things: 1) The game will be classified as "NextGen" 2) The game will be on more than one "NextGen" console (note the plural "platforms") Looking at the other games on their list, we realize more things about their game production habits. Firstly, observe the consoles their games have been released on: PS2 / PS3: TimeSplitters, TimeSplitters 2, Second Sight, TimeSplitters Future Perfect, HAZE XBOX (none on 360 yet): TimeSplitters 2, Second Sight, TimeSplitters Future Perfect GC: TimeSplitters 2, Second Sight, TimeSplitters Future Perfect PC: Second Sight From the above information, I make these predictions on the unknowns on the page: TimeSplitters 4: PS3, XBOX 360 Secret Project: PS3, XBOX 360, PC Now my reasons for the predictions are these. First of all, "NextGen Platforms" must logically include both the PS3 and XBOX 360, so they are given (obvious, I know). If the "Secret Project" is indeed Battlefront III, It will probably be on the PC. The reason I believe this is because PC games are easily moddable and therefore last much longer in the higher ranks than comparable "static" games. I would have lost interest in Empire at War and the Battlefield series long ago if it weren't for the mods available for each. From a marketing perspective: the PS3 and XBOX 360 are the most powerful NextGen Consoles on the market, and would be the best picks for a FPS with as big a hype as Battlefront III. Both of the other BF, as well a substantial amount of other Star Wars games have come out for the PC if at all on the consoles; this therefore means that many fans of Star Wars games will have a PC, because of the volume of good games for it. I doubt FR would ignore such a large portion of Star Wars gamers. In short, more gamers for a console = more buyers = more $$$; the vast majority of SW Gamers either have a PC, or a console from Sony or Microsoft (or all three, as some have). The smart thing would be for them to create an easily moddable version for the PC, then give the two console versions a whole bunch of extras that couldn't be duplicated by mods on the PC. This would create double sales from many who own a PC and a Console - the gamer buys the PC version for the mods, and the version for the console of their choice for all the extras. I'm starting to see more games built this way in the attempt to get more sales on the same game, and the people at Free Radical are clearly not stupid; they'll likely attempt the same. The only difference is they'll actually be successful. Those are my reasons: FR will make BFIII on the PS3 according to FR's production habits, on the 360 (because it's another NextGen console), and the PC because LucasArts / Battlefront tradition dictates it to at least be on PC. Another reason that applies to having all three is so the game is available to a wider range of gamers, and therefore make more money. To whoever said it above: yes, making video games costs a lot of money in itself, but it would actually be more expensive to make two video games than it would be to make a single game on multiple consoles; why do you think they do it all the time? To jawathehutt: I think it'll be 4.5m O, but 2.25m O2, depending on whether you wanted the natural diatomic state or not (I think, seeing as how there'd be 1.5m O2 and 3m O in CaCO3). I could be wrong, but I don't have my chemistry teacher on hand to ask, so I'll go with the answer of 2.25m of O2. Correct me if I'm wrong, please. But I digress... oh, and about the LucasArts "dropping" Star Wars? To that I say, "A bigger load of yellow journalism I've never seen." (I could say worse things, but that would be against my religious principles) LucasArts formed a PARTNERSHIP with Free Radical, that's not the same as dropping Star Wars and handing it over to some other company. It'd never happen in the first place though, so why even bring it up? If I've made any goof-ups, please point them out so that I may correct them. Thank you! Nice, you've done some research!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deathclone Posted March 15, 2008 Share Posted March 15, 2008 i read some of it got bord. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TripHammer Posted March 15, 2008 Share Posted March 15, 2008 Good thoughts there Onihikage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joesdomain Posted April 1, 2008 Share Posted April 1, 2008 I doubt Battlefront 3 would be exclusive to PS3 and X-box 360. The PS2 and PC got it! They are releasing The Force Unleashed and Lego Indiana Jones on PS2. Thrillville and Thrillville 2 are on PS2 also. PSP also got Star Wars Battlefront II, Thrillville 2 and Star Wars Lego. My final prediction for versions of Battlefront 3 are PS3, PS2, PSP, X-360, Wii, Nintendo DS and PC. Then a year after release it will come out for Mcintosh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shukkoku Posted August 5, 2008 Share Posted August 5, 2008 I'm still hoping that it comes to the wii, and/or PC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nelson88 Posted August 12, 2008 Share Posted August 12, 2008 That's a poor sales market if it's only to XBOX 360. It'll be for all platforms as Lucasarts now supports publishing their main titles for all platforms now, such as Force Unleashed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rinku Posted August 12, 2008 Share Posted August 12, 2008 I don't remember where but I think I read that SWBF3 is coming out on all systems (ie. Wii, PS3, Xbox 360, PC, DS & PSP). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RC-1183 Posted August 12, 2008 Share Posted August 12, 2008 the DS are the stupid thats gonna be horrible u know they made CoD4 for the DS? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jawathehutt Posted August 13, 2008 Share Posted August 13, 2008 Lets leave random handheld bashing to other forums kthxbai Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vader815 Posted August 31, 2008 Share Posted August 31, 2008 why would they not release it for the PC... its like all part of the cycle XBOX, PS3, and the PC... (no not you Wii)... i mean they could do what they did with force unleashed... create a slightly dumb down version so that the hardware can handle it... and thing you wouldnt even have to put an anything special in the PC version to make it more interesting cuz ppl can mod it! thats got to count for some percentage of sells Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.