Ztalker Posted July 6, 2010 Share Posted July 6, 2010 Clicky MGM has deep financial troubles and doesn't have the money to start producing a new part in the legendary James Bond franchise. MGM: "We do not know when development will resume and cannot comment further at this stage." MGM won't sell the rights to the franchise I suppose, so our favorite spy is retiring early. Thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astor Posted July 6, 2010 Share Posted July 6, 2010 I thought that had been cancelled months ago... Not really bothered, if i'm honest. The new Bond wasn't bad, but I never liked it as much as the classic ones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sabretooth Posted July 6, 2010 Share Posted July 6, 2010 The real reason is that they know they can never make a spy movie as good as Alpha Protocol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lynk Former Posted July 6, 2010 Share Posted July 6, 2010 Old news. But in the meantime Daniel Craig is working on the remake of GoldenEye for Wii... I guess they have to do something... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RC-1162 Posted July 6, 2010 Share Posted July 6, 2010 Meh, I'm waiting for the new Bourne anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Q Posted July 6, 2010 Share Posted July 6, 2010 Not really bothered, if i'm honest. The new Bond wasn't bad, but I never liked it as much as the classic ones. Same here. No one can replace Connery. Besides, the Cold War has been over for nearly 20 years, so what's the point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Totenkopf Posted July 6, 2010 Share Posted July 6, 2010 Same here. No one can replace Connery. Thirded. Connery IS Bond. No substitutions, thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JediAthos Posted July 6, 2010 Share Posted July 6, 2010 I think the franchise will return eventually. If MGM continues to have financial troubles they will either get bought out or shutdown all together either of which will put Bond in someone else's hands. If not that they will eventually sell it to help pay off their debts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordOfTheFish Posted July 6, 2010 Share Posted July 6, 2010 Not suprising really. So many companies are going bankrupt. However I think it's wrong to torture the fans and not sell the franchise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mimartin Posted July 6, 2010 Share Posted July 6, 2010 MGM won't sell the rights to the franchise I suppose, so our favorite spy is retiring early. 22 movies over 46 years, does not sound like early retirement to me. I'm just happy the franchise became somewhat respectable again before fading away. Still want to poke my eyes out for watching A View to a Kill. Cannot believe Roger Moore played Bond in 32% of the Bond movies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Totenkopf Posted July 6, 2010 Share Posted July 6, 2010 22 movies over 46 years, does not sound like early retirement to me. I'm just happy the franchise became somewhat respectable again before fading away. Still want to poke my eyes out for watching A View to a Kill. Cannot believe Roger Moore played Bond in 32% of the Bond movies. Yeah, I'd tend to agree. Craig was also more in the mold of Connery (who probably should've said no to Never Say Never Again, btw) and a more worthy successor than Moore for the title of 007. Didn't hate Roger, just thought he was more pretty-boy than hardass. Didn't care from Brosnan for pretty much the same reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mimartin Posted July 6, 2010 Share Posted July 6, 2010 Didn't care from Brosnan for pretty much the same reason. Of course I agree, Connery was the best, but my 2nd and 3rd choices may out my bad taste. I liked Timothy Dalton and Pierce Brosnan. Dalton gets the nod because he was a very welcome changed from Moore who I liked at first, but I grew to loath him with each movie. I liked Brosnan since he was on Remington Steele and wanted him to replace Moore when Dalton got the job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Totenkopf Posted July 6, 2010 Share Posted July 6, 2010 Didn't really have a problem with Dalton as Bond, except that I wasn't really crazy about his enemies and Miriyam D'abo wasn't really hot for a bond chick (not saying ugly, btw). Dalton's 007 (like Craig's) was more Connery-like in overall attitude. I liked Moore in Live and Let Die, but by View to a Kill he just looked like he'd hung on to the part too long. Might have been interesting to see how Brosnan would have handled the part earlier on had it not been for his Steele contract. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Windu Posted July 6, 2010 Share Posted July 6, 2010 Man, Daniel Craig is the best Bond I've ever seen. Probably because I never saw the Connery movies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mav Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 ^^^ the **** is wrong with you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Q Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 ^ Miriyam D'abo wasn't really hot for a bond chick (not saying ugly, btw). Her cousin Olivia was (and still is) much, much hotter! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Totenkopf Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 ^ Her cousin Olivia was (and still is) much, much hotter! Indubitably. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 ^^^ the **** is wrong with you? Craig is my favorite as well, and I've seen all the movies I don't think this means the end for Bond at all, I just think it means a longer wait till the next one. I just hope it's not so far away that we won't get another movie with Craig, though that is seeming likely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lynk Former Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 I'm sure the third bond movie with Craig will definitely end up being the last bond movie with him... and most likely the third and final of the "origin story" that they've been going with with Casino Royale and Quantum of Solace... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser'eck Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 The franchise had to end sooner or later. Craig is a very good Bond but Connery will always be Bond! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Windu Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 ^^^ the **** is wrong with you? I can't imagine having to sit through countless hours of Bond films... it just doesn't interest me enough. I love Casino Royale and that's about it. Quantum was a disappointment. Goldeneye was cool but not more than that. Casino Royale was what gave me some of the tricks I use today, in poker and in life. Though I will say, they play really crappy poker in that movie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Avlectus Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 Most of the ones I saw were with Pierce Brosnan. I thought I'd seen some good stuff. Then I saw a classic or two with Connery and it became obvious that I *clearly* hadn't seen anything but the tip of the iceberg. Those modern ones were respectable and good for today. The ones that started it were the REAL prizes. Man, Daniel Craig is the best Bond I've ever seen. Probably because I never saw the Connery movies. ^^^ the **** is wrong with you? Seconded. I doubt this will be the end either, but it may be a very long time before we see another installment. I just hope the next super power laser it uses is Green. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pavlos Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 I'm just happy the franchise became somewhat respectable again before fading away. Quantum of Solace made no sense whatsoever. It really didn't; I still have no idea what the plot was, and even if I did I doubt there'd be much direction to it. People die, there's a party, more people die, there's a fire, someone else dies. To quote Mark Kermode: Title, rubbish; taken from a story which this had nothing to do with. And I'm sorry, if you call something Quantum of Solace there needs to be a point at which you go 'oh, OK, that's a really clever thing to have called it' rather than [it making as much sense as] Pond of Wood, Fish of Trees. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mav Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 I can't imagine having to sit through countless hours of Bond films... it just doesn't interest me enough. I love Casino Royale and that's about it. Quantum was a disappointment. Goldeneye was cool but not more than that. Casino Royale was what gave me some of the tricks I use today, in poker and in life. Though I will say, they play really crappy poker in that movie. You don't have to watch countless hours of Bond films, just watch Goldfinger at the least. I'm not saying I don't like Craig, Casino Royale was quite good, Quantum was not, but that was not so much his fault. You should also check out You Only Live Twice, if only to see azn Connery. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mimartin Posted July 8, 2010 Share Posted July 8, 2010 Quantum of Solace made no sense whatsoeverNever saw Quantum of Solace, I was speaking towards the lines of how Bond was rescued somewhat after the gadget happy days of Roger More. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.