mimartin Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 What trend in the gaming industry do you find the most troubling? 1. Online activation and online requirement to play (DRM). 3rd party requirement (Steam to play Skyrim or Origin to play Mass Effect 3). 2. Along the same lines. Digital distribution the move towards no longer having a physical copy and only being able to purchase the game from certain digital distributors (exp Origin) 3. Streamlining games in an attempt to make them more attractive to a wider audience. 4. More and more games being made with consoles in mind and PC just being a ported after thought. 5. More games trying to add multiplayer/co-op Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MsFicwriter Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 My main gripe is with the DRM (why, why, WHY, especially if it's a single-player game), but I'm also disgusted with the fourth option. Example: Skyrim. The controls on PC are simply maddening for me, and I don't own a console, so there you have it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChAiNz.2da Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 DRM for sure. While I LOVE Steam.. I don't think it should be a requirement for others who are not so fond. I can only imagine the RAGE I'd feel if I were required to use Origin... (I play ME on console ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexrd Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 "1. Online activation and online requirement to play (DRM). 3rd party requirement (Steam to play Skyrim or Origin to play Mass Effect 3)." This, without a doubt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mandalore5 Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 I'd vote for all of them if I could, but I mainly hate the fact that I can't actually get a physical game. If a PC/console dies, and I don't have a disc to reinstall it with, then what would I do? It's far more reliable to actually have a hard copy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mimartin Posted February 15, 2012 Author Share Posted February 15, 2012 I'd vote for all of them if I could, but I mainly hate the fact that I can't actually get a physical game. If a PC/console dies, and I don't have a disc to reinstall it with, then what would I do? It's far more reliable to actually have a hard copy. Can't speak for the rest (don't have them), but with Steam, you just redownload them. It is just like magic or having the disc, only you can't lose the disc or scratch it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Totenkopf Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 Voted Yoda, NOT b/c there aren't problems, but b/c several of the options all seemed equally bad to me. Both DRM and lack of physical copy bother me about the same. If I'm gonna play a game, I at least want it on the disc I bought. Having DLable backups (like w/Steam, etc..) IS good, but not a substitute. #5 bothers me least, as long as the MMO type content isn't really integral to the story itself (but mostly an op to rack up a body count or just kill time, for instance). Streamlining and platform issues are in the middle with this group of options. ME3 is likely (along w/maybe TOR) to be my last vid game purchase for quite awhile. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lynk Former Posted February 16, 2012 Share Posted February 16, 2012 In many ways digital distribution implies DRM to begin with... of course not always, just look at Good Old Games... but yeah, still. Platform issues can go the other way too of course, PC games that get horrid console ports but no one seems to complain about that since I've found that console owners are more open to having multiple platforms available to them to begin with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M@RS Posted February 16, 2012 Share Posted February 16, 2012 Yoda for, Online activation and online requirement to play (DRM) and Console Designed/PC Ported. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sabretooth Posted February 16, 2012 Share Posted February 16, 2012 DRM can be gotten around, but a game made for consoles and ported to PC remains a waste. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pho3nix Posted February 16, 2012 Share Posted February 16, 2012 DRM can be gotten around, but a game made for consoles and ported to PC remains a waste. Yeah, this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lynk Former Posted February 16, 2012 Share Posted February 16, 2012 Sabre's only miffed about consoles because he pirates all his games and you can't really do that cheaply or for free with consoles... at least newer ones that aren't handhelds since you can easily download emulators and roms for the older and less powerful ones Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexrd Posted February 16, 2012 Share Posted February 16, 2012 Can't speak for the rest (don't have them), but with Steam, you just redownload them. It is just like magic or having the disc, only you can't lose the disc or scratch it up. And with Steam, you have to hope someone doesn't hack your account or you don't get banned for some reason... I know cases where people were banned without doing anything wrong. And they don't give any explanation. That's the problem of being dependable of 3rd party software or servers. You don't have any control over what you legally payed for. On GOG for example, you do have your account where you can download the games you legally bought any time you want. But if you choose to download the .exe and save it on a disc, hard drive, whatever, you can. And you won't ever need any kind of activation or login to play the game. It yours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordOfTheFish Posted February 16, 2012 Share Posted February 16, 2012 I haven't played any PC games lately, but DMR takes the cake on this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mimartin Posted February 17, 2012 Author Share Posted February 17, 2012 I know cases where people were banned without doing anything wrong. And they don't give any explanation.I don't know anyone that has been banned, but I have read about that on the internet. I also read about people being banned from bioware or EA's website, have their game in their hands, but still can't play it because of the ban. Again, don't know anyone that was banned, but I have read it. I'm not losing any sleep over it, I've just decided not to post on Bioware or EA's official websites or even Steam for that matter. I'll post here and wait for Lynk to ban me, he has no control over my games though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusIsGonnaOwnSatan Posted February 17, 2012 Share Posted February 17, 2012 DRM takes the cake for me. Runner up would be console ports. What about DLC? Is anyone still annoyed about those things? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexrd Posted February 17, 2012 Share Posted February 17, 2012 I'll post here and wait for Lynk to ban me, he has no control over my games though. What about DLC? Is anyone still annoyed about those things? Yes. Although generally I can wait for the GotY edition or similar where it comes with all DLC. But I still hate it, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorge Posted February 18, 2012 Share Posted February 18, 2012 Why is the option "Yoda" on pretty much every poll? LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
d3sd0 Posted February 18, 2012 Share Posted February 18, 2012 Yoda simply because almost all of the other options bother me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joesdomain Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 I am worried about all this online video gaming. I have been a single player video gamer all my life through PS1, PS2 and now PS3. It just discusts me that Lucasarts chose a online only game for PC for the Old republic. Where is non-online single/multiplayer Star Wars Battlefront III for consoles? Star Wars Battlefront I and II were Lucasarts highest selling video games to date. Why cancel the series after making all that money? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexrd Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 Why cancel the series after making all that money? Who said they cancelled the series? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lynk Former Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 They don't cancel anything at LucasArts, they just stop making stuff. It's not a very difficult concept to grasp... technically TOR isn't even a LucasArts game, it's a BioWare game. LA does nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mimartin Posted February 22, 2012 Author Share Posted February 22, 2012 Why is the option "Yoda" on pretty much every poll? LOL Same reason polls have "None of the above" in them. It gives people something to vote for even if they do not care enough to think about it. Besides "it is tradition and I'm traditional kind of guy." no clue what movie/tv show that line is from Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexrd Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 LA does nothing. When they hire a developer for a Star Wars game (Jedi Outcast, KotOR, TOR, and many others), LucasArts always takes care of the sound design. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lynk Former Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 You mean grab pre-existing assets from the huge archive of Star Wars sounds and music in Lucas' empire and forward it to those developers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.