Fredi Posted February 18, 2008 Posted February 18, 2008 Well I was thinking of it and I was wondering… which sith rule people would like more? … The Rule of Kaan(Brotherhood of Darkness ), the Rule of 2 from Darth Bane or the Rule of One of Darth Krayt? … I think the wisest would be the Rule of 2 but let me know you’re opinion.
Fredi Posted February 18, 2008 Author Posted February 18, 2008 explain them Rule of Two - http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Rule_of_Two Rule of One - http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Rule_of_One Brotherhood of Darkness - http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Brotherhood_of_Darkness
DeadYorick Posted February 18, 2008 Posted February 18, 2008 I actually like Bane's rule of two. Since as Revan explained "Any master who instructs more than one apprentice in the ways of the dark side is a fool." ―Revan Since obviously the more apprentices you have the more likely they will all band and try and kill you together. Which lessens the chance of survival. Bane was quite intelligent in creating the Rule of Two after the battle of Ruusan
Miltiades Posted February 19, 2008 Posted February 19, 2008 The Rule of Two. It was the most successful.
Fredi Posted February 19, 2008 Author Posted February 19, 2008 Really the rule of 2 came way back from Naga Sadow and Freedon Nadd
Corinthian Posted February 19, 2008 Posted February 19, 2008 The Brotherhood. With a decent propaganda campaign and not calling yourself "The Brotherhood of Darkness" and openly referring to yourselves as followers of the Dark Side, as well as presenting yourself as a Force Faith rather than a group of Sith Lords, you can gather a large enough force to easily overwhelm the Jedi Knights. With the Rule of Two, you've got no manpower. And the Rule of One is just The Brotherhood, updated.
Fredi Posted February 19, 2008 Author Posted February 19, 2008 With the Rule of Two, you've got no manpower. The Force is a great wepond ... There is no need of manpower... 1 very well trained man in the force and lightsaber combat can be more powerfull than a complete army ... a good example can be Nihilus ... with the force he can destroy a complete planet... thats why I would choose Rule of 2 ... no need of thousands of that sooner or later will try to take my power... lol
Nedak Posted February 19, 2008 Posted February 19, 2008 The rule of two. Even Sith Lords might get lonely. XD
Corinthian Posted February 19, 2008 Posted February 19, 2008 Uh, no. Nihilus was an animal. He had no cunning, just brute force. He was an idiot. See, here's how you deal with a small unit of Jedi Knights and Mandalorians who have infilitrated your ship - disable the containment fields around the ship, and all your enemies are sucked into space. Click click owned. As for your other points, the more the better. The Clones are a prime example of this - they annihilated 99% of the Jedi Order instantly. Admittedly, they had the element of surprise, but even so. Cadres of properly trained Dark Jedi are the obvious advancement of this. As for them betraying me, that's a simple enough problem to deal with. Brainwashing, my son. With a good indoctrination campaign, you can give them undying loyalty to you as well as endless hatred towards the Jedi or whoever else you want them to carve into fishbait.
PoiuyWired Posted February 19, 2008 Posted February 19, 2008 Sounds like there is yet another Sith Schism coming to LF. I would support the Rule of One though. And yes, note the difference of this structure compare to the Old Brotherhood, and to the Old Jedi Order, and to other Force Groups.
Jasper_Kazai Posted February 19, 2008 Posted February 19, 2008 I like the Brotherhood, only because there can be more conflict then. Star Wars is nothing without conflict.
Ghost Down Posted February 19, 2008 Posted February 19, 2008 The Rule of One - There can only be one True Power!
Darth InSidious Posted February 19, 2008 Posted February 19, 2008 The Old Sith Empire is the infrastructure to follow. Fighting the Jedi almost always means fighting the Republic. Therefore, you need to be able to attack both through the Force, and with conventional arms. Add to this a society built upon the use of the Force and training in it, and you have the potential for the destruction of the Republic. The only reason the Sith lost the Great Hyperspace War was because Naga Sadow was foolishly overconfident.
adamqd Posted February 19, 2008 Posted February 19, 2008 The Old Sith Empire is the infrastructure to follow. ~snip~ QFT!
Prime Posted February 19, 2008 Posted February 19, 2008 With the Rule of Two, you've got no manpower. Au contraire! The Rule of two always had lots of beings working for them, whether they knew it or not.
Corinthian Posted February 19, 2008 Posted February 19, 2008 Sure, but we all know how useful Stormtroopers and their ilk are
Miltiades Posted February 19, 2008 Posted February 19, 2008 Sure, but we all know how useful Stormtroopers and their ilk are Not only Storm Troopers (or Clone Troopers) worked for them, a lot more other beings (Dark Jedi, spies, droids). And the Storm Troopers aren't useless (Battle of Hoth, and a lot of Eu sources, forget about Endor ).
Pho3nix Posted February 19, 2008 Posted February 19, 2008 Rule #34. That poll needs the "other" option.
Corinthian Posted February 19, 2008 Posted February 19, 2008 Phoenix, that is NOT what Rule #34 of the Internet is. I don't ever want to see that discussed in this thread again. Look Rule 34 of the Internet up, and do it with filters on maximum. At the Battle of Hoth, the Stormtroopers outnumbered and outgunned the Rebels by at least 10:1, had orbital support and AT-ATs, and STILL took a lot of casualties.
Lantzen Posted February 19, 2008 Posted February 19, 2008 Vote: The Rule of 2 But if i would be a sith lord i would use The Rule of 1, just because i would have all the power for myself and woulden't need to worry about some apprentice trying to backstab me ^^
Rev7 Posted February 20, 2008 Posted February 20, 2008 I have to go with the Rule of Two, mainly because, IMO, the best way to pass on your knowledge would have to be through having an apprentice. Also, because if I was a Sith, I would want someone to keep me company. Always got to put yourself in their shoes!
SilentScope001 Posted February 20, 2008 Posted February 20, 2008 Rule of Zero. Why have the Sith get a ruler? If you are being ruled, you are weak. Every Sith for himself! Only then can the Sith truly be powerful.
Lantzen Posted February 20, 2008 Posted February 20, 2008 Because then they would just go around doing random things like kicking dogs and cats and stealing candy from children ^^
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.