tFighterPilot Posted March 18, 2004 Posted March 18, 2004 Originally posted by majinrevan When is this vehicle coming out???? I have been on edge for news about this AT-AT or the AT-TE being made for the AOTCTC, but no new news has arrived. I hope it comes out soon!!!! AT AT has nothing to do with AoTCTC
FlyingWookiee Posted March 18, 2004 Posted March 18, 2004 Originally posted by tFighterPilot AT AT has nothing to do with AoTCTC He didn't say that. I have been on edge for news about this AT-AT or the AT-TE being made for the AOTCTC, but no new news has arrived.
Methos007 Posted March 18, 2004 Posted March 18, 2004 I wonder how the AT-AT affects fps in game. It's about the size of 2atst on top of eachother and pretty long.
Duncan_10158 Posted March 18, 2004 Author Posted March 18, 2004 Now that i released the Hailfire Droid i have one project less in the to do row! Jupeee! i added a third death animation for the ATAT, i think the animations are about 80% done now. it doesnt mean we are close to releasing it, we have still lot to do. did somebody here take a look at the bounds box of the vehicles? you know those boxes that handles the collision controle and setts the angle of visibilaty. you can make those visible by using the console comand: cg_showvehbounds 1 these bounds boxes seems to be orinted always in the same direction. how could creat one that fits the shape of an ATAT and fits the direction of the vehicle. perhaps by putting two together or something like this. Originally posted by MadCow1989 Back to the atat so duncan would you or Others be able to make a lil Fixing Mod that kills you when a plane takes off or a vehicle moves when inside it? i dont think is possible to have multible players driving an ATAT in a reasonable way. the engine and the network code isnt created for that. but in fact i dont know. i think it would have no real sense in gameplay, to sit in an ATAT while anotherone is driving it just isnt fun. if the additional drivers could fire thire weapons, but that causes unsynchronisations in the network code and the ATAT hasnt weapons that are aiming independent from the head. Originally posted by monsoontide Is it just me or are 50% of the posts - when will 'x' be released? No, its me too. Originally posted by Autobot Traitor I wonder how the AT-AT affects fps in game. It's about the size of 2atst on top of eachother and pretty long. its a good point, to have the ATAT in game but killing the fps doesnt make much sense. but the size of the model isnt that importhent for the fps, its more the number of polygons. right now about 3500, whats about the count of a detaild playermodel. but i dont know what effect will have the big maps on wich the ATAT have to be played. i will add LOD support for the ATAT, so at far distance the polygon count will lower and if the fps drops you can also lower the level of model details.
Methos007 Posted March 19, 2004 Posted March 19, 2004 Either way, it's one spicy meatball! This would work really great with a siege hoth map. Mabye if we bug livingdeadjedi enough...
PR-0927 Posted March 21, 2004 Posted March 21, 2004 Any updates on the AT-AT? Maybe some more walking animations or some pics. The links to walking animations don't work (some of them do). I can't wait!!
Methos007 Posted March 21, 2004 Posted March 21, 2004 It's gonne be funny when players try to run under the ATAT and slice open its belly like Luke did in ESB only to get stepped on.
Neon Posted March 21, 2004 Posted March 21, 2004 Yeah, and then they get a big foot of the on him, lol And if you can't wait, majinrevan, you better let him work and don't let him make pics or videos.
MadCow1989 Posted March 21, 2004 Posted March 21, 2004 well walking in the middle of the ATAT legs would be hard to make i think since you cant even walk throu the ATST legs The model scale (what you cant see but the Scale size etc) would need a Big hole in the Under Middle of the ATAT I think
Admiral Chemix Posted March 21, 2004 Posted March 21, 2004 Ever try walking under somethin bigs legs? It doesn't work. The bounding box (I think thats what it's called) prevents it. It's like how u can stand in between the wing of an xwing and the cockpit, stanging on nothing. Dang if somethin were to fix this to rely on the actualy mesh, it would rock. People would reanact Rogue Squadron 3 again and again (if it's based on ESB, I wouldn't know, I haven't watched ESB in 5-6 years, forgot what the battle on hoth was like) Heck we could make a seige map like that, that gives me an idea
Methos007 Posted March 21, 2004 Posted March 21, 2004 Originally posted by Admiral Chemix I haven't watched ESB in 5-6 years, forgot what the battle on hoth was like) My GOD! A Star Wars fan who hasnt seen the battle of Hoth in 6 years??? I watch it just about every day:atat:
EvillittleJawa Posted March 21, 2004 Posted March 21, 2004 This atat has been on for months it must be really GOOD when it comes out
Methos007 Posted March 21, 2004 Posted March 21, 2004 You can bet yer jawa butt on that. It's good to know Duncan follows up on his projects- NeoMarz, whom I greatly respect, dropped out of his Bantha project right before he was going to release it.
tFighterPilot Posted March 21, 2004 Posted March 21, 2004 Originally posted by Autobot Traitor My GOD! A Star Wars fan who hasnt seen the battle of Hoth in 6 years??? I watch it just about every day:atat: I like you Battle of hoth was the best battle EVAH! (it had Snow Speeders)
Methos007 Posted March 21, 2004 Posted March 21, 2004 Originally posted by tFighterPilot I like you Battle of hoth was the best battle EVAH! (it had Snow Speeders) Yea and now we can mix your snowspeeder with the ATAT for some battlefield 1942 ish action:D
tFighterPilot Posted March 21, 2004 Posted March 21, 2004 Since Emon has deserted his project, I don't see how it can be done
Methos007 Posted March 21, 2004 Posted March 21, 2004 Ah, well, since the .map file is included of hoth siege, the major elements like the shield generator could be put in another map. With easygen, terrain such as hoth is no problem, the only trouble would be with the objectives. OF course, it could always be a simple ffa map.
tFighterPilot Posted March 22, 2004 Posted March 22, 2004 You mean objectives? I think the only objective should be "Destroy the power generator" but it shan't be easy
Methos007 Posted March 22, 2004 Posted March 22, 2004 Come to think of it, rogue squadron games would be a good source of objectives. You could have something like "Destroy stations one and two", "destroy shield generator" and "destroy escaping rebels"
tFighterPilot Posted March 22, 2004 Posted March 22, 2004 The last one doesn't make much since, unless the rebels would also have some objective.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.