starmark2k Posted May 30, 2006 Posted May 30, 2006 Watching the news this morning I heard someone estimate that a picture of Brad Pitts and Angelina Jolies New Baby is estimated to be worth $1,000,000. You read correctly, some media will be willing to purchace a single picture of a baby for 1 million U.S Dollars. Now my pursonal opinion is whats the point, i think 1 baby looks like the everyoher baby, They are small and make women talk in really high pitch voices. I was just wondering if anyone else out there actually cared what this baby of a couple of movie stars actually looks like?
RaV™ Posted May 30, 2006 Posted May 30, 2006 Like you said a baby is just a baby. Guess which one i chose
Sabretooth Posted May 30, 2006 Posted May 30, 2006 No. Strictly No. I don't the baby's gonna be as bloody handsome as Brad Pitt or as hot as Jolie. This is just stupid publicity superstar teenage-girls-love-it sort of ****. I hate it. Now I'm gonna get frustrated and swear all day.
Jeff Posted May 30, 2006 Posted May 30, 2006 They news could just get any random picture of a baby and say it's theirs, if nobody has seen the real baby yet
Lantzen Posted May 30, 2006 Posted May 30, 2006 And get sued for false information, dont think that. No f****** way it's worth that much money for a picture on there baby
Mace MacLeod Posted May 30, 2006 Posted May 30, 2006 I'm not sure, but I think I saw the number 5 million somewhere in the news. And yeah, it just boggles the mind how people besides Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie and their families could really care so much about what their newborn baby looks like. It'll look like a baby! Duuuuuhhhh! Are they expecting it to have three heads or a forked tongue or something? It's not going to pop out and start tap-dancing, is it? The people who make stuff like this such an issue that tabloids get into bidding wars over photos of a newborn are for whom the phrase "GET A LIFE!" was invented.
MTV2 Posted May 30, 2006 Posted May 30, 2006 to the media, if thats the only picture of their baby, is worth alot. its like in angels&demons, where they sold like 30 seconds of footage for $1million. but to us, who cares about the picture?
Captain-Panaka7 Posted May 30, 2006 Posted May 30, 2006 Yeah who cares about a pic of a baby like Mace_Macleod said its looks like a normal baby not with 3 head lol pretty funny Mace
The Doctor Posted May 30, 2006 Posted May 30, 2006 Well, if this picture is worth $1 000 000, then I guess the pictures that Prime's put up of his little girl are worth just as much. Let's start fundraising...
Captain-Panaka7 Posted May 30, 2006 Posted May 30, 2006 Well, if this picture is worth $1 000 000, then I guess the pictures that Prime's put up of his little guy are worth just as much. Let's start fundraising... So true. WE SHALL START A FUNRAISER!! lol
Prime Posted May 30, 2006 Posted May 30, 2006 Well, if this picture is worth $1 000 000, then I guess the pictures that Prime's put up of his little guy are worth just as much. Let's start fundraising...I could use the money. And she's a girl.
igyman Posted May 30, 2006 Posted May 30, 2006 A million $ for a picture of somebody's baby??? You'd have to be really crazy to pay that.
Samnmax221 Posted May 30, 2006 Posted May 30, 2006 I hate them both, there both crummy actors, I don't care about celebrities, and on a sidenote Brad Pitt seems to think he deserves a part in the upcoming Atlas Shrugged Movie not a chance in hell!
The Doctor Posted May 30, 2006 Posted May 30, 2006 I could use the money. And she's a girl. My apologies, then. Fixed.
FiEND_138 Posted May 30, 2006 Posted May 30, 2006 I hate them both, there both crummy actors, I don't care about celebrities I'm so sick of the celebrity worship. Honestly, she squirted out a kid...... so what?
Jae Onasi Posted May 30, 2006 Posted May 30, 2006 No. Strictly No. I don't the baby's gonna be as bloody handsome as Brad Pitt or as hot as Jolie. This is just stupid publicity superstar teenage-girls-love-it sort of ****. I hate it. Now I'm gonna get frustrated and swear all day. It's not even worth the frustration, and it would be a waste of a fine expletive. I'm not going to buy any tabloids, magazines, or anything else to see the picture anyway, so I'm not out anything.
Mace MacLeod Posted May 30, 2006 Posted May 30, 2006 I beg to differ about Brad Pitt being a crummy actor--12 Monkeys, Snatch, Fight Club, Kalifornia, The Devil's Own, Se7en...all really good work, IMHO. I still don't give a rat's ass what his baby looks like, though. Honestly, if he wasn't famous, people would be biting through screen doors to get away from him when he whips out the baby pics.
Achilles Posted May 30, 2006 Posted May 30, 2006 Supply and demand. Supply is low so demand is high. The parents have sequestered themselves in a foriegn country and paid a king's ransom for privacy, therefore paparazzi are going to do everything possible of kill themselves to get a pic. Of course the tabloids will be tripping over themselves to get said pic so that they can sell a billion copies of whatever trash tabloid they spew out to the masses. Applying the same principles they could kill the whole thing by flooding the market with baby pics, but then they're whoring out their newborn, so... How to convince a world full of people with nothing else better to do to get a life? Hmmm.... EDIT: And to piggy back off of Mace's comments, Brad Pitt is not a talentless actor. Angelina on the other hand...
Samnmax221 Posted May 31, 2006 Posted May 31, 2006 EDIT: And to piggy back off of Mace's comments, Brad Pitt is not a talentless actor. Angelina on the other hand... Angelina is John Voights Daughter and she has large mammeries enough said, I still don't want either of them in Atlas Shrugged, both of them being part of the damn Hollywood elite it woulsn't make much sense for them to star in a film about individualism, no would it.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.