urluckyday Posted March 2, 2014 Posted March 2, 2014 (This BBCode requires its accompanying plugin to work properly.) I could see him as Thrawn
Lynk Former Posted March 2, 2014 Posted March 2, 2014 He's around 30, right? Feels like he'd be a bit too young to be Thrawn. Someone in their 40s, at least, with a bit more presence would be needed to pull off the Grand Admiral.
Alexrd Posted March 2, 2014 Posted March 2, 2014 Since it seems to be in their plans to bring the old folks back, the sequel trilogy will probably have to be set around 30 years after Return of the Jedi. No chance for him to play Thrawn (if it even exists).
Shem Posted March 14, 2014 Posted March 14, 2014 (This BBCode requires its accompanying plugin to work properly.)
Darth InSidious Posted March 24, 2014 Posted March 24, 2014 So, going on Star Trek: Into Mild Letdown, we can expect Star Wars: Those Fabulous Trade Embargoes to come out in time for Armistice Day 2018. And get a 6/10.
Lynk Former Posted March 25, 2014 Posted March 25, 2014 Please don't remind me about the latest Star Trek movie... it's depressing.
urluckyday Posted March 26, 2014 Posted March 26, 2014 I guess I was the only one that really enjoyed that most recent Star Trek movie. But again, I never really liked Star Trek, so I'm sure that gives me a far different perspective.
The Doctor Posted March 26, 2014 Posted March 26, 2014 Actually apart from a few minor things, I rather enjoyed Into Darkness as well.
Dread Advocate Posted March 26, 2014 Posted March 26, 2014 I enjoyed Into Darkness as well. Not my absolute favorite Trek film, but it's up there in my top 5.
HED Posted March 27, 2014 Posted March 27, 2014 I enjoyed Into Darkness, and stylistically it gave me a bit more hope that Abrams will tone-down his style (the infamous lens flare) for Episode VII.
Shem Posted April 8, 2014 Posted April 8, 2014 Filming has started on Episode VII!!! (This BBCode requires its accompanying plugin to work properly.) And some casting news: (This BBCode requires its accompanying plugin to work properly.)
Prime Posted April 14, 2014 Posted April 14, 2014 So I take it we can all agree now that they nail is in the EU coffin?
Darth InSidious Posted April 14, 2014 Posted April 14, 2014 OK, so: 1. They've started filming but haven't finished casting; 2. They're getting a 69-year-old to play a part he last played when he was thirty-eight. This speaks to (1) disorganisation, and (2) either a lack of clearheadedness, or a certain lack of confidence to make bold decisions. It may not be the case with either of these things, but it looks like it. High expectations, combined with Abrams' apparent lack of anything new to say (for which, see Star Trek: Into A Sort of Dusky Late Afternoon), and what looks like a certain amount of poor preparation, and this doesn't look like it's going to miss the mark. It will still, undoubtedly, gross huge amounts. But the question isn't whether Ep VII makes money; the question is whether Ep VIII does.
Hassat Hunter Posted April 15, 2014 Posted April 15, 2014 So I take it we can all agree now that they nail is in the EU coffin? And not a single tear was shed...
Shem Posted April 15, 2014 Posted April 15, 2014 2. They're getting a 69-year-old to play a part he last played when he was thirty-eight. Hold on there. Peter Mayhew was in Revenge of the Sith as Chewbacca. So he was either 59 or 60 when he filmed his scenes depending on when it got done between 2003-2004. Speaking of Revenge of the Sith and this goes for Attack of the Clones, Christopher Lee was in his 80's when he played Count Dooku which included lightsaber duels. My point is they'll make it work because digital technology and CGI shots are much better now than it was when they made the prequels.
Darth Avlectus Posted April 15, 2014 Posted April 15, 2014 ^^^Besides Ol' Ian Played Palpatine in both trilogies. For the prequels he was up there in age and he was one of the better parts of it. Long as none of them are suffering from Alzheimer disease or dementia I think it should be workable...I mean at this point we only know THAT they are filming, not what it will be. While I want to grumble, I'm going to wait and see until I start bitching.
adamqd Posted April 15, 2014 Posted April 15, 2014 And not a single tear was shed... I certainly shed a tear a while ago, but I've been preparing for this inevitability since the sequel trilogy was announced.
Lynk Former Posted April 15, 2014 Posted April 15, 2014 I am waiting... I have no idea how any of this will turn out...
Gurges-Ahter Posted April 16, 2014 Posted April 16, 2014 While I have my fears (like most Star Wars fans), my general excitement vastly outweighs them. I admit I put the blinders on a bit when it comes to Star Wars (including the prequels), but I can't help but have high hopes (unintentional alliteration) when it comes to the sequel trilogy. Larry Kasdan is great, JJ Abrams has done great things, Kathleen Kennedy is great, Lucas is still advising to some extent, and Disney has done exceptionally well with the Marvel Franchise.
Shem Posted April 16, 2014 Posted April 16, 2014 (This BBCode requires its accompanying plugin to work properly.)
Astor Posted April 17, 2014 Author Posted April 17, 2014 Thanks for all the rumours and updates, Shem! My point is they'll make it work because digital technology and CGI shots are much better now than it was when they made the prequels. We may as well do away with actors entirely soon. I can see why Ian McKellen was reportedly annoyed whilst filming The Hobbit. ^^^Besides Ol' Ian Played Palpatine in both trilogies. For the prequels he was up there in age and he was one of the better parts of it. Ian McDiarmid was a young man playing an old man in the original trilogies. He was around the right age when the prequels came around. Long as none of them are suffering from Alzheimer disease or dementia I think it should be workable...I mean at this point we only know THAT they are filming, not what it will be. My only concern is that Peter Mayhew, as much as we all love him, hasn't been in the best of health over the last few years, especially since having both his knees replaced. I just hope that the filming schedule doesn't add to those health problems.
Darth Avlectus Posted April 18, 2014 Posted April 18, 2014 My only concern is that Peter Mayhew, as much as we all love him, hasn't been in the best of health over the last few years, especially since having both his knees replaced. I just hope that the filming schedule doesn't add to those health problems. Well, if it's any cheer up for ya...my dad hobbled around on a decrepit knee for nearly 31 years. He got it replaced, a bit of rehab later he was walking better and standing taller than I ever remembered in my life. His injury was from before I was born. This was 5 years ago next month in may. Now I can't really speak to any other health issues Peter may be having BUT...Gotta expect a particularly large man as Mayhew to develop some joint problems later in life. When you consider pro wrestlers Andre the Giant and Giant Gonzales and how they died younger and in worse shape...I'd say Mayhew stands a comparatively good chance. So long as the gig doesn't have him doing anything too strenuous. ...and a prayer never hurts.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.