martmeister Posted March 26, 2007 Posted March 26, 2007 When a record company had pity on William Hung from American Idol and let him do an album, I thought that was BS. He sucked, that's why he didn't progress! I guess any idiot with no singing talent and a boo-hoo attitude can get 15mins.
DarthAve Posted March 26, 2007 Posted March 26, 2007 ..Yeah I have talent, I mean i've only been playing Ondine for about 3 days and I've already masteredmy first song. Maybe I'm just awesome.
Davinq Posted March 26, 2007 Posted March 26, 2007 The time and effort my... competitors are putting into their campaigns is a bit ridiculous. They are putting so much effort into convincing you to vote for them, and what if that hard work carries through? What if they actually do their jobs as mods, and edit posts and close threads? Do you want such tyranny to occur here on the heathen island? DO YOU!? In a nutshell, vote for Davinq and someone else, so you can have a fun, honest mod, as well as another to satisfy the admins.
Samnmax221 Posted March 26, 2007 Posted March 26, 2007 QUIT STEALING MY JACKSONIAN VIEWS DAVINQ. Are we kicking out the Indians?
Samnmax221 Posted March 27, 2007 Posted March 27, 2007 Haha, when aren't we? When we're harrassing the Gypsies, as we should.
Miss_Mayhem Posted March 27, 2007 Author Posted March 27, 2007 You dont like Raz!? Gasp! And why the hell would I do what is considered 'my job' by the standards set from modz uninitiated to our ways??? I'd be lax and carefree.
Samnmax221 Posted March 27, 2007 Posted March 27, 2007 As soon as they stop trying to steal my Silverware I'll not dislike them anymore, besides Halo is a filthy Gypsy.
Davinq Posted March 27, 2007 Posted March 27, 2007 What I don't understand is why we are convincing our fellow forumites to support us being mods, when it should be our admins we should be discussing this with. [/cue Thrik]
Emperor Devon Posted March 27, 2007 Posted March 27, 2007 We all know racism goes against the most fundamental principles of Objectivism, Sam.
St. Jimmy Posted March 27, 2007 Posted March 27, 2007 Aren't we all? The answer is no. But sometimes it's hard to tell..
Samnmax221 Posted March 27, 2007 Posted March 27, 2007 We all know racism goes against the most fundamental principles of Objectivism, Sam. Gypsy is an umbrella term, it doesn't just mean the Roma. Kind of like how unfunny doesn't just cover you, Davinq, and Halo.
Davinq Posted March 27, 2007 Posted March 27, 2007 Gypsy is an umbrella term, it doesn't just mean the Roma. Kind of like how unfunny doesn't just cover you, Davinq... And it applies to you? I fail to see an occassion when any post of yours could have come close to being deemed humorous.
Emperor Devon Posted March 27, 2007 Posted March 27, 2007 And it applies to you? I fail to see an occassion when any post of yours could have come close to being deemed humorous. He says he supports Objectivism. If you've read any of Ayn Rand's books that statement alone can give you a good chuckle.
Miss_Mayhem Posted March 27, 2007 Author Posted March 27, 2007 You just got owned, Sam ... We'd need a neutral party to contact Thrik. Anyone running who tried would be deemed incredibly desperate.
St. Jimmy Posted March 27, 2007 Posted March 27, 2007 Hmm,... It seems I'm slow at typing today.... Either that or having incredibly bad timing/luck
Samnmax221 Posted March 27, 2007 Posted March 27, 2007 He says he supports Objectivism. If you've read any of Ayn Rand's books that statement alone can give you a good chuckle. Learn the difference between racism and taboo breaking. Shouldn't you be following Jae around? You just got owned, Sam ... He reversed an insult, I'm not seeing funny there?
DarthAve Posted March 27, 2007 Posted March 27, 2007 Are we kicking out the Indians? No, we're gonna leave that out. And the whole Depression of 1836 thing he caused for Van Buren.
Hallucination Posted March 27, 2007 Posted March 27, 2007 We'd need a neutral party to contact Thrik. Anyone running who tried would be deemed incredibly desperate. elTee said he will come up with a way to apply and share it with us on Wednesday, therefore I believe we should wait until then. Also, I noticed in your list of traits you claim to possess, and you said you are 'good in English', a statement you contradicted in you next trait ('spell good'), because 'spell' is a verb, and should therefore be modified by an adverb and not an adjective. The correct thing would have been saying that you spell well.
Smon Posted March 27, 2007 Posted March 27, 2007 elTee said he will come up with a way to apply and share it with us on Wednesday, therefore I believe we should wait until then. Also, I noticed in your list of traits you claim to possess, and you said you are 'good in English', a statement you contradicted in you next trait ('spell good'), because 'spell' is a verb, and should therefore be modified by an adverb and not an adjective. The correct thing would have been saying that you spell well. Check and mate. Lost my vote.
Davinq Posted March 27, 2007 Posted March 27, 2007 elTee said he will come up with a way to apply and share it with us on Wednesday, therefore I believe we should wait until then. Also, I noticed in your list of traits you claim to possess, and you said you are 'good in English', a statement you contradicted in you next trait ('spell good'), because 'spell' is a verb, and should therefore be modified by an adverb and not an adjective. The correct thing would have been saying that you spell well. Ouch. Tell me Mayhem, how do you believe this grammar scandal will effect your campaign?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.