Sabretooth Posted April 21, 2011 Posted April 21, 2011 Mav was born. And the world was an infinitely better place. This is where we celebrate this. Mav's awesomeness birthday thread go!
Q Posted April 21, 2011 Posted April 21, 2011 And there was much rejoicing. Yaaayy. Obligatory Google image search yielded a crappy 70s automobile: You get to push it home. Happy birthday, bro!
Bob Lion54 Posted April 21, 2011 Posted April 21, 2011 Happy Birthday, Mav! I got you a MAV! Micro Air Vehicle
Tommycat Posted April 21, 2011 Posted April 21, 2011 Happy Birfeee MAV I got you a MAV that works without GPS
ChAiNz.2da Posted April 21, 2011 Posted April 21, 2011 Happy Birthday Mav! Google assures me this is a cake EDIT: It might be safer to eat mim's cake, as the one I gave you resembles a pimp-hat circa 1940
mimartin Posted April 21, 2011 Posted April 21, 2011 Happy Birthday Mav. I got you cake. Eat my cake before ChAiNz's as one of the side effects of the cake I got you is it will make you hungry for cake. Despite what Evil Q wrote, the 1972 Ford Maverick wasn’t a crappy car. It was a really fun car for a 15 year old to drive to the beach.
JediMaster12 Posted April 21, 2011 Posted April 21, 2011 Here's another Mav for the birthday boy. Better than the plastic rocket and pony from the Birthday Gizka.
Lynk Former Posted April 21, 2011 Posted April 21, 2011 (This BBCode requires its accompanying plugin to work properly.)
mimartin Posted April 21, 2011 Posted April 21, 2011 Prime said: I'll be your Goose if you'll be my Mav. Didn't the other Mav get his Goose cooked?
Q Posted April 21, 2011 Posted April 21, 2011 mimartin said: Despite what Evil Q wrote, the 1972 Ford Maverick wasn’t a crappy car. It was a really fun car for a 15 year old to drive to the beach. With a 302 and a 4-speed it wouldn't be bad, no.
Liverandbacon Posted April 21, 2011 Posted April 21, 2011 I got you a MAV-5 armored vehicle. It's on wheels and Italian, so it's pretty much the closest thing I could get you to a Ferrari.
Pavlos Posted April 22, 2011 Posted April 22, 2011 Happy Birthday! I got you a picture of Jacques Derrida. It's not in anyway related to your name, but it's good for throwing things at.
Sabretooth Posted April 22, 2011 Author Posted April 22, 2011 Pavlos said: Happy Birthday! I got you a picture of Jacques Derrida. It's not in anyway related to your name, but it's good for throwing things at. Derrida said: blah blah blah x120 pages It is now relevant to your name.
Pavlos Posted April 22, 2011 Posted April 22, 2011 Sabretooth said: It is now relevant to your name. But the silence of the word (lurch|word -- the irregularity of instability in meaning shown) is unknown. What do we mean by unknown? What do we mean by silence? What do we mean by word? Word is name but name is not name. We have to maintain now (maintenant) the circular pursuit of unmeaning in confidence of knowing at the moment of unknowing of unmeaning. The logic of this novelty is not to be contested against even by the most ancient ancientness. But once again we should not allow ourselves to be unfair to the search of name. Hamlet: 'It was the best of times. It was the worst of times'. Seeing that we are not made with real lemons does not contest the possibility that we are made with real lemons (ideal, mechanical, or dialectical). In a Christian tradition: Thus do we know our unknowing. In reality, in the unreality of reality (toilette), we know our unknowing only by reference to the word, which itself is postally telescopic. The post: reduction of sentiment to word and then the mode of transmission to the door of the letteree, to be reconstructed through opening of the letter, revelation of content and extrapolation of sentiment (as opposed to reason, but not unreason) by the letteree. If said letter is intercepted by other than the leteree, though the address can be extrapolated to the word, can the word be returned to the sentiment without the contextual understanding of the intended leteree. Only the intended can be the leteree. Yet who is the intended of a name? Unlike the letter -- though made up of letters, or epistolae -- it has no leteree. Thus names must -- can or ken -- be unstable in sense. And Derrida = Mav and Mav = Derrida. Context is external to sense as sense exists still without context, and indeed without intent.
Mav Posted April 22, 2011 Posted April 22, 2011 Thanks for the birthday wishes, unfortunately the cake will have to wait until next year, because if I ate any now it wouldn't stay in my tummy for very long.
Det. Bart Lasiter Posted April 22, 2011 Posted April 22, 2011 Mav said: Thanks for the birthday wishes, unfortunately the cake will have to wait until next year, because if I ate any now it wouldn't stay in my tummy for very long. mim's cake might stay down, it looks like it might be good for nausea.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.