Boba Rhett Posted November 12, 2002 Share Posted November 12, 2002 2 Hours 59 Minutes and 9 Seconds Straight from Peter Jackson's mouth. REJOICE and be GLAD. ...... dooooo it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taos Posted November 12, 2002 Share Posted November 12, 2002 How does that compare to the time of FOTR?? Hell, I can't remember now.......the new DVD I'll be getting tomorrow will be longer......... Thx for the info btw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NerfYoda Posted November 12, 2002 Share Posted November 12, 2002 Damn thats cool. Know if there'll be an intermission? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elijah Posted November 12, 2002 Share Posted November 12, 2002 Long movies rule I Cant wait to see TTT... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boba Rhett Posted November 12, 2002 Author Share Posted November 12, 2002 FotR was 2h 51m I think. Anyone got an exact time? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCanr2d2 Posted November 12, 2002 Share Posted November 12, 2002 171 sounds about right for the theatrical release of LOTR: FOTR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Groovy Posted November 12, 2002 Share Posted November 12, 2002 *Note to self; that's a "NO" on the large soda.* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leXX Posted November 12, 2002 Share Posted November 12, 2002 Originally posted by Boba Rhett FotR was 2h 51m I think. Anyone got an exact time? 178 mins or 2h 58min source - http://us.imdb.com/Title?0120737 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Surfnshannon Posted November 12, 2002 Share Posted November 12, 2002 k just to prepare myself...but i saw FOTR and was kinda bored in it....I understand it is more interesting to those who read the book and it did have some special effects etc etc etc. But really I thought the movie was kinda slow. In this TTT movie....since it is also lengthy - is this movie more ACTION PACKED all around - keep you on the edge of your seat. Or do I need to be prepared for the same kind of lag like in the first movie?? (i'm not dissing it) I just don't know if I want to go see a 2 hr and 59 min movie in a theater. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Simpson Posted November 12, 2002 Share Posted November 12, 2002 Definitely a LOT more action in this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kstar__2 Posted November 12, 2002 Share Posted November 12, 2002 FOTR kept me on the edge of the chair, i can't wait to see TTT! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StormHammer Posted November 12, 2002 Share Posted November 12, 2002 I like loooong movies. I actually thought the theatrical release of LOTR:FOTR was a bit too short...because it skipped over a few things. So I'm glad the DVD Special Edition has about another half an hour footage of deleted scenes. I hope they do the same with TTT when it's released on DVD. The longest film I remember watching was the uncut version of Heaven's Gate...which ran to about four and a half hours - and it was superior in every way to the execrable butchered two and a half hour version. The longest I was ever in a cinema theatre...was to watch the 3 films of the Classic Star Wars trilogy back-to-back (on the release of ROTJ). I was in there for about 7 and a half hours (over night). Heh. When I have all 3 of the LOTR (SE) DVD's in hand...I intend to lock myself in a room and play the whole thing from start to finish... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pad Posted November 12, 2002 Share Posted November 12, 2002 normally is shoud be happy and ownin the SE dvd but unfortunatly the stores didnt want to cooperate. i went to 3stores and all were sold out. the only thing i could find was an epII video. but i dont give up, ill own it tomorrow:p or else Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darklighter Posted November 12, 2002 Share Posted November 12, 2002 Rhett, I'm guessing you like Lord Of The Rings...am I right? ;)lol It is approximately one minute longer than FOTR...ironic, since the first book was about 50 pages longer than the second lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhantomHelix Posted November 12, 2002 Share Posted November 12, 2002 that sounds long.....but that awful movie Titanic was longer..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ckcsaber Posted November 12, 2002 Share Posted November 12, 2002 I'd rather watch a long movie than a 90 min movie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elijah Posted November 12, 2002 Share Posted November 12, 2002 Originally posted by PhantomHelix that sounds long.....but that awful movie Titanic was longer..... all 3 LOTR movies will smash Titanic... and let it sink to the sea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leXX Posted November 12, 2002 Share Posted November 12, 2002 I liked Titanic! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hekx Posted November 12, 2002 Share Posted November 12, 2002 The longest movie I've seen is 4 and a half hours long It was the latest remake of The Shining, all the parts, recorded off Channel 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DiRtY $oUtH™ Posted November 13, 2002 Share Posted November 13, 2002 I really hope that this new one is better than the original. It was kinda boring and Froto didnt do ****. He kept on falling. I remember counting at least like 4 falls in the movie. He is supposed to be the chosen one but he cant even keep his balance! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elijah Posted November 13, 2002 Share Posted November 13, 2002 Originally posted by leXX I liked Titanic! *looks around* Nope... I dont see any... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigTeddyPaul Posted November 13, 2002 Share Posted November 13, 2002 Originally posted by Darth Yoda85 I really hope that this new one is better than the original. It was kinda boring and Froto didnt do ****. He kept on falling. I remember counting at least like 4 falls in the movie. He is supposed to be the chosen one but he cant even keep his balance! Frodo doesn't really do anything in the books. He carries the ring and SPOLER gets poisoned by a "spider" and all teh death defying things but he doesn't do to much. Heck SPOILER he didn't even destroy the ring. The other hobbits did more. Merry? even had a SPOLIER troll die on top of him. That little dude faced a troll. Sam does more in the movies than anyone will. I cannot wait! Helm's Deep battle will rock. Too bad Shelob won't be in this like Shelob should. I wonder how it will end since I thought that the book ending was FANTASTIC. BigTeddyPaul Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Groovy Posted November 13, 2002 Share Posted November 13, 2002 Originally posted by leXX I liked Titanic! *sighs* All girls like Titanic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Datheus Posted November 13, 2002 Share Posted November 13, 2002 Originally posted by Darth Yoda85 I really hope that this new one is better than the original. It was kinda boring and Froto didnt do ****. He kept on falling. I remember counting at least like 4 falls in the movie. He is supposed to be the chosen one but he cant even keep his balance! Read the books man and appreciate the art. LOTR is more than just about action Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhantomHelix Posted November 13, 2002 Share Posted November 13, 2002 Originally posted by leXX I liked Titanic! ahh, titanic.........possibly the worst and most patthetic movie evr...........no, i thought the plot was good, dont get me wrong, but leo dick-aprio ruined the whole thing for bein in it..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.