Thrik Posted February 16, 2007 Share Posted February 16, 2007 How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Jones Posted February 16, 2007 Share Posted February 16, 2007 Excellent! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diego Varen Posted February 16, 2007 Share Posted February 16, 2007 As much wood as a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff Posted February 16, 2007 Share Posted February 16, 2007 If a woodchuck could chuck wood? Bucket o' mud worth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jan Gaarni Posted February 16, 2007 Share Posted February 16, 2007 The answer is obvious, but not an option: A woodchuck could chuck no amount of wood since a woodchuck couldn't chuck wood. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samnmax221 Posted February 16, 2007 Share Posted February 16, 2007 But if a woodchuck could chuck and would chuck some amount of wood, what amount of wood would a woodchuck chuck? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cmdr. Cracken Posted February 16, 2007 Share Posted February 16, 2007 IF a woodchuck could chuck wood and the wood that the woodchuck chucked weighed exactly 3.2 lbs per, in standerd 2x4 shape, the woodchuck could chuck 3.892 pieces of wood per hour. If a woodchuck could chuck wood. ;D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jan Gaarni Posted February 17, 2007 Share Posted February 17, 2007 Oh shut up! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grace Posted February 17, 2007 Share Posted February 17, 2007 The question says 'if', therefore I call on the most basic answer... which is basically the question in statement form... sorta the 'How long will I live? You shall live as long as your life is and not one second longer,' idea. A woodchuck would chuck as much wood as a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood. (how freakishly odd that sounds ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ctrl Alt Del Posted February 17, 2007 Share Posted February 17, 2007 As much wood as a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood Because it can woodchuck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Det. Bart Lasiter Posted February 18, 2007 Share Posted February 18, 2007 Thrik make it so I can make LF polls. That would be so badass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RC-1162 Posted February 18, 2007 Share Posted February 18, 2007 As much wood as a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeaTurtle Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 My thoughts exactly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CSI Posted February 20, 2007 Share Posted February 20, 2007 Don't know what it's talking about though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Jones Posted February 21, 2007 Share Posted February 21, 2007 Yeah, make jmac a badass LF poll maker already! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Det. Bart Lasiter Posted February 21, 2007 Share Posted February 21, 2007 Yeah, make jmac a badass LF poll maker already! This sort of thing just warms my ice cold heart Ray. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master_Archon Posted February 21, 2007 Share Posted February 21, 2007 As much chuck as a wood could would, chuck? Chuck nuck.....wood chuck chunk......um, OH forget it! I voted for the third...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titanius Anglesmith Posted February 22, 2007 Share Posted February 22, 2007 A woodchuck would chuck as much wood as a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck would. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DAWUSS Posted February 22, 2007 Share Posted February 22, 2007 All I get out of this thread is, "Chuck"... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Jones Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 Because y'all not cool enough to comprehend. jmac show them love! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Det. Bart Lasiter Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 Because y'all not cool enough to comprehend. jmac show them love! I had to censor it ;_; Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fish.Stapler Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 As much wood as a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood, of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samuel Dravis Posted February 24, 2007 Share Posted February 24, 2007 Three fingers is the only correct answer, ya newbies. Jeeze! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hallucination Posted May 17, 2007 Share Posted May 17, 2007 The true question is would a woodchuck chuck wood if a woodchuck could chuck wood? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Newfie Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 The true question is would a woodchuck chuck wood if a woodchuck could chuck wood? How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood? It would chuck all the wood that a woodchuch could if a woodchuck could chuck wood but since it could not, would not, should not chuck wood then a woodchuck should not chuck wood yet if a woodchuck could chuck wood it would chuck all the wood that a woodchuck could if a woodchuck could chuck wood which is out of luck because a woodchuck can't chuck wood. Savvy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.